Locating disability within online body positivity discourses: an analysis of #DisabledAndCute

References

• Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Wasim, Peter Bath, and Gianluca Demartini. 2017. “Using Twitter as a Data Source: An Overview of Ethical, Legal, and Methodological Challenges.” In The Ethics of Online Research: Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, edited by Kandy Woodfield, 79–107. Vol. 2. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2018. Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Colin. 1992. “Disabling Imagery and the Media: An Exploration of the Principles for Media Representations of Disabled People.” The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People. Halifax: Ryburn Publishing. Accessed 8 January 2022. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/Barnes-disabling-imagery.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Keah. 2017. “How One Woman Celebrates Her Disability with the #disabledandcute Hashtag.” Essence, May 2. Accessed 12 January 2022. https://www.essence.com/culture/disabled-and-cute-creator-keah-brown/
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Keah. 2018. “Episode 40: Disabled Writers with Keah Brown.” Disability Visibility Podcast, December 16. Transcript accessed 12 January 2022. https://disabilityvisibilityproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Disabled-Writers_Keah-Brown.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Keah. 2019. The Pretty One: On Life, Pop Culture, Disability and Other Reasons to Fall in Love with Me. New York: Atria Paperback.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Rose Troup. 2017. “People are Sharing #disabledandcute Photos and It’s Beautifully Empowering.” Buzzfeed News, February 16. Accessed 8 January 2022. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rosebuchanan/people-are-sharing-disabledandcute-and-it-is-wonderfully-exc
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Jess. 2013. “For White Girls Only? Postfeminism and the Politics of Inclusion.” Feminist Formations 25 (1): 35–58. doi:10.1353/ff.2013.0009.
   Google Scholar
• Caldeira, Sofia P., and Sander De Ridder. 2017. “Representing Diverse Femininities on Instagram: A Case Study of the Body-positive @effyourbeautystandards Instagram Account.” Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 9 (2): 321–337. doi:10.1386/cjcs.9.2.321_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2009. Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen-Strynø, Maria Bee, and Camilla Bruun Eriksen. 2020. “Madeline Stuart and Disability Advocate and Brand: Exploring the Affective Economies of Social Media.” In Disability, Media, and Representations: Other Bodies, edited by Diana Garrisi and Jacob Johanssen, 35–50. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, Edgar Gómez, and Helen Thornham. 2015. “Selfies beyond Self-Representation: The (Theoretical) F(r)ictions of a Practice.” Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 7 (1): 28073. doi:10.3402/jac.v7.28073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, Joshua Paul, Joyce Goggin, Julia Leyda, Anthony P. McIntyre, and Diane Negra. 2017. The Aesthetics and Affects of Cuteness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Darwin, Helena, and Amara Miller. 2021. “Factions, Frames, and Postfeminism(s) in the Body Positive Movement.” Feminist Media Studies 21 (6): 873–890. doi:10.1080/14680777.2020.1736118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellcessor, Elizabeth, Mack Hagood, and Bill Kirkpatrick. 2017. Disability Media Studies. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Katie. 2015. Disability and Popular Culture: Focusing Passion, Creating Community and Expressing Defiance. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, Jamie. 2019. “This Viral Hashtag Lets People With Disabilities Show Off Their Sexy Sides.” HuffPost, March 12. Accessed 8 January 2022. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/disabled-people-are-hot-hashtag_n_5c869242e4b08d5b78641b90
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Nick, and Pam Alldred. 2015. “New Materialist Social Inquiry: Designs, Methods and the Research-Assemblage.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 18 (4): 399–414. doi:10.1080/13645579.2014.921458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, Kelly. 2013. “The Neoliberal Circulation of Affects: Happiness, Accessibility and the Capacitation of Disability as Wheelchair.” Health, Culture and Society 5 (1): 135–149. doi:10.5195/HCS.2013.136.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, Paul. 2015. “The Gestural Image: The Selfie, Photography Theory, and Kinesthetic Sociability.” International Journal of Communication 9: 1607–1628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2000. “Staring Back: Self-Representations of Disabled Performance Artists.” American Quarterly 52 (2): 334–338. doi:10.1353/aq.2000.0024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2002. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” NWSA Journal 14 (3): 1–32. doi:10.2979/NWS.2002.14.3.1.
   Google Scholar
• Garrisi, Diana, and Jacob Johanssen. 2020. ”Introduction.” In Disability, Media, and Representations: Other Bodies, 1–18. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, Ysabel. 2018. “Beyond the Hashtag: Circumventing Content Moderation on Social Media.” New Media and Society 20 (12): 4492–4511. doi:10.1177/1461444818776611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrard, Ysabel. 2020. “What’s in a (Pseudo)name? Ethical Conundrums for the Principles of Anonymisation in Social Media Research.” Qualitative Research. doi:10.1177/1468794120922070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Rosalind. 2017. “The Affective, Cultural and Psychic Life of Postfeminism: A Postfeminist Sensibility 10 Years On.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 20 (6): 606–626. doi:10.1177/1367549417733003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, Rosalind, and Ana Sofia Elias. 2014. “Awaken Your Incredible’: Love Your Body Discourses and Postfeminist Contradictions.” International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 10 (2): 179–188. doi:10.1386/macp.10.2.179_1.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Anita. 2004. Future Girl: Young Women in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Sarah. 2017. “Exploring Disabled Girls ’Self-representational Practices Online.” Girlhood Studies 10 (2): 114–130. doi:10.3167/ghs.2017.100209.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Bill. 2009. “Wounded/Monstrous/Abject: A Critique of the Disabled Body in the Sociological Imaginary.” Disability & Society 24 (4): 399–410. doi:10.1080/09687590902876144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynnä-Granberg, Kaisu. 2021. “Why Can’t I Take a Full-shot of Myself? of Course I Can!” Studying Selfies as Socio-technological Affective Practices.” Feminist Media Studies 1–16. doi:10.1080/14680777.2021.1886139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaitlynn, Mendes, Jessica Ringrose, and Jessalynn Keller. 2019. Digital Feminist Activism: Girls and Women Fight Back against Rape Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Deborah. 1999. Disability: Controversial Debates and Pyschosocial Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, Micheline. 1992. “Internalised Oppression.” In Disability Equality in the Classroom: A Human Rights Issue, edited by Micheline Mason, and Richard Rieser. 27–28. London: Disability Equality in Education.
   Google Scholar
• McCosker, A., and Ysabel Gerrard. 2020. “Hashtagging Depression on Instagram: Towards a More Inclusive Mental Health Research Methodology.” New Media & Society 1–21. doi:10.1177/1461444820921349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, Brittney. 2017. “Twitter Trend #disabledandcute Is Empowering Disabled People.” Teen Vogue, February 15. Accessed 8 January 2022. https://www.teenvogue.com/story/disabled-and-cute-empowering-hashtag
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, Angela. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, David T., and Sharon Snyder. 2015. The Biopolitics of Disability: Neoliberalism, Ablenationalism and Peripheral Embodiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Narins, Elizabeth. 2017. “These Sassy #disabledandcute Tweets Will Give You Life.” Cosmopolitan, February 15. Accessed 8 January 2022. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/health-fitness/a8877440/disabledbutcute-hashtag/
   Google Scholar
• Projansky, Sarah. 2014. Spectacular Girls: Media Fascination and Celebrity Culture. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ptolomey, Amanda. 2018. “What Might We Be Missing? Reflecting on the Absence of Disabled Girls in Girls’ Studies Theory and Practice.” Presented at XVII Annual Conference of Youth Studies. University of Helsinki, Finland, November 5-6.
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose, Jessica. 2013. Postfeminist Education? Girls and the Sexual Politics of Schooling. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, Nicola. 2017. Postfeminism(s) and the Arrival of the Fourth Wave. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sastre, Alexandra. 2014. “Towards a Radical Body Positive: Reading the Online ‘Body Positive Movement’.” Feminist Media Studies 14 (6): 929–943. doi:10.1080/14680777.2014.883420.
   Google Scholar
• Schalk, Sami. 2016. “Reevaluating the Supercrip.” Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 10 (1): 71–86. doi:10.3828/jlcds.2016.5.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, Emma. 2020. “Performing Normal but Becoming Crip: Living with Chronic Pain.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 22 (1): 39–47. doi:10.16993/sjdr.619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebers, T. 2001. “Disability in Theory: From Social Constructionism to the New Realism of the Body.” American Literary History 13 (4): 737–754. doi:10.1093/alh/13.4.737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, Jen, Embla Ágústsdóttir, and Freyja Haraldsdóttir. 2018. “Becoming Intelligible Woman: Gender, Disability and Resistance at the Border Zone of Youth.” Feminism & Psychology 28 (3): 409–426. doi:10.1177/0959353518769947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinstra, Deborah. 2015. “Trumping All? Disability and Girlhood Studies.” Girlhood Studies 8 (2): 54–70.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, Anastasia. 2016. “Disabled Girlhood and Flexible Exceptionalism in HBO’s Miss You Can Do It.” Girlhood Studies 9 (1): 21–35. doi:10.3167/ghs.2016.090103.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, Anastasia. 2018. “Virtual (Dis)orientations and the Luminosity of Disabled Girlhood.” Girlhood Studies 11 (3): 34–49. doi:10.3167/ghs.2018.110305.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, Susan. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendell, Susan. 2016. “Unhealthy Disabled: Treating Chronic Illnesses as Disabilities.” In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by Leonard J. Davis, 160–174. 5th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, Sabine. 2018. “Interfacing the Self: Smartphone Snaps and the Temporality of the Selfie.” In Exploring the Selfie: Historical, Theoretical, and Analytical Approaches to Digital Self-Photography, edited by Julia Ekel, Jens Ruchatz, and Sabine Wirth, 213–238. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Stella. 2012. “We’re Not Here for Your Inspiration.” The Drum, July 3. accessed 8 January 2022. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-07-03/young-inspiration-porn/4107006
   Google Scholar