Men not going their own way: a thick big data analysis of #MGTOW and #Feminism tweets

References

• Anderson, Elizabeth. 1995. “Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and Defense.” Hypatia 3 (10): 50–84. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00737.x.
   Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, Sarah. 2018. Empowered: Popular Feminism and Popular Misogyny. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, Sarah, and Kate Miltner. 2016. “#masculinitysofragile: Culture, Structure, and Networked Misogyny.” Feminist Media Studies 16 (1): 171–174. doi:10.1080/14680777.2016.1120490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, Kim, and O. Olga Jurasz. 2018. Online Misogyny as Hate Crime: A Challenge for Legal Regulation?. New York, New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beckwith, Karen. 2007. “Mapping Strategic Engagements: Women’s Movements and the State.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 9 (3): 312–338. doi:10.1080/14616740701438218.
   Google Scholar
• Bendl, Regine. 2000. “Gendering Organization Studies: A Guide to Reading Gender Subtexts in Organizational Theories.” LTA 3 (00): 373–393.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, Mary Angela, and Ever Jose Figueroa. 2018. “Faith and Reason: An Analysis of the Homologies of Black and Blue Lives Facebook Pages.” New Media & Society 20 (9): 3097–3118. doi:10.1177/1461444817740822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratich, Jack, and S. Sarah Banet-Weiser. 2019. “From Pick-Up Artists to Incels: Con Games, Networked Misogyny, and the Failure of Neoliberalism.” International Journal of Communication 13: 5003- 5027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chełkowski, Tadeusz, Dariusz Jemielniak, Kacper Macikowski, and S. Lozano. 2021. “Free and Open Source Software Organizations: A Large Scale Analysis of Code, Comments and Commits Frequency.” Plos One 16 (9): e0257192. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark-Parsons, Rosemary. 2019. “’I See You, I Believe You, I Stand with You’: #Metoo and the Performance of Networked Feminist Visibility.” Feminist Media Studies 21 (3): 362–380. doi:10.1080/14680777.2019.1628797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousineau, Luc. 2021. Masculinity in Two Reddit Men’s Communities: Feminism is Foul, Privilege is Precarious, and Being Beta is Bad. Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Duguay, Philippe. 2021. “Read It on Reddit: Homogeneity and Ideological Segregation in the Age of Social News.” Social Science Computer Review 40 (5): 1186–1202. doi:10.1177/08944393211001053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, T., M. Fernandez, J. Novotny, and H. Alani (2019). Exploring Misogyny Across the Manosphere in Reddit. In: WebSci ’19 Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, pp. 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Ging, Debbie, and Eugenia Siapera. 2019. Gender Hate Online: Understanding the New Anti-Feminism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Sarah, Moya Bailey, and Brooke Foucault Welles. 2020. #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jemielniak, Dariusz. 2020. Thick Big Data: Doing Digital Social Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jemielniak, Dariusz, and Yaroslav Krempovych. 2021. “An Analysis of AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation and Fear Mongering on Twitter.” Public Health 200: 4–6. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jezierska, Katarzyna. 2022. “Incredibly Loud and Extremely Silent: Feminist Foreign Policy on Twitter.” Cooperation and Conflicts 57 (1): 84–107. doi:10.1177/00108367211000793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Callum, Verity Trott, and Scott Wright. 2019. “Sluts and Soyboys: MGTOW and the Production of Misogynistic Online Harassment.” New Media and Society 22 (10): 1903–1921. doi:10.1177/1461444819887141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, Jonas, and Adrian Rauchfleisch. 2020. “Birds of a Feather Get Recommended Together: Algorithmic Homophily in Youtube’s Channel Recommendations in the United States and Germany.” Social Media Society 6 (4): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidig, Eviane. 2021. “Why Terrorism Studies Miss the Mark When It Comes to Incels.” https://icct.nl/publication/why-terrorism-studies-miss-the-mark-when-it-comes-to-incels/
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Ke. 2016. “Integrating Ethical Guidelines and Situated Ethics for Researching Social-Media-Based Interactions: Lessons from a Virtual Ethnographic Case Study with Chinese Youth.” Journal of Information Ethics 25 (1): 114–131.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, K. 2017. “Integrating Ethical Guidelines and Situated Ethics for Researching Social-Media-Based Interactions: Lessons from a Virtual Ethnographic Case Study with Chinese Youth.” Journal of Information Ethics 25 (1): 114–131.
   Google Scholar
• Mamie, Robin, Manoel Horta Ribeiro, and Robert West. 2021. “Are Anti-Feminist Communities Gateways for the Far Right? Evidence from Reddit and YouTube.” In 13th ACM Web Science Conference. (virtual conference, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Manne, Kate. 2017. Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manne, Kate. 2020. Entitled: How Male Privilege Hurts Women. New York City: Crown Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• McBain, Sophie. 2020. “The New Age of Misogyny.” New Statesman. https://www.newstatesman.com/entitled-kate-manne-men-hate-women-laura-bates-review.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn, Clare, Erika Rackley, and Ruth Houghton. 2017. “Beyond ‘Revenge Port’: The Continuum of Image-Based Sexual Abuse.” Feminist Media Studies 25 (1): 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Micu, Adrian, Angela Eliza Micu, Marius Geru, and Radu Constantin Lixandroiu. 2017. “Analyzing User Sentiment in Social Media: Implications for Online Marketing Strategy.” Psychology & Marketing 34 (12): 1094–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, Jessica. 2020. “Militant Meninism: The Militaristic Discourse of Gamergate and Men’s Rights Activism.” Media, Culture & Society 42 (5): 654–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2012. “Demographics and Political Views of News Audiences.” https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/09/27/section-4-demographics-and-political-views-of-news-audiences/
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, C., M.A. Kaufhold, and T. Spielhofer (2017). Social Media in Emergencies: A Representative Study on Citizens’ Perception in Germany. Proc. ACM Hum. -Comput. InteractVol. 1(CSCW). New York, NY, USA: Association For Computing Machinery: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, Christian, Marc-Andre Kaufhold, and Thomas Spielhofer. 2019. ”Social Media in Emergencies: A Representative Study on Citizens’ Perception in Germany”. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1.CSCW, 1–19. New York, NY: Association For Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Rezapour, Rezvaneh. 2018. “Using Linguistic Cues for Analyzing Social Movements.” https://Www.Researchgate.Net/Publication/326851940_Using_Linguistic_Cues_For_Analyzing_Social_Movements
   Google Scholar
• Roth-Cohen, Osnat. 2021. “Viral- Feminism: #Metoo Networked Expressions in Feminist Facebook Groups.” Feminist Media Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval-Almazan, R., and J. Ramon Gil-Garcia. 2014. Towards Cyberactivism 2.0? Understanding the Use of Social Media and Other Information Technologies for Political Activism and Social Movements. Government Information Quarterly, 31 (3), 365–378. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaptura, Maria, and Kaitlin M. Boyle. 2020. “Masculinity Threat, “Incel” Traits and Violent Fantasies Among Heterosexual Men in the United States.” Feminist Criminology 15: 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shifman, Limor, and Dafna Lemish. 2011. “Mars and Venus in Virtual Space: Post-Feminist Humor and the Internet.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 28 (3): 253–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, Colin. 2003. “Inside the Media.” International Socialism Spring. http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/isj98/sparks.htm
   Google Scholar
• Statista. 2021. “News Sources Worldwide.” https://www.statista.com/statistics/281915/main-news-sources-millennials/
   Google Scholar
• Sugiura, Lisa. 2021. The Incel Rebellion: The Rise of the Manosphere and the Virtual War Against Women. Bingley, West Yorkshire, England: Emeral Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Swirsky, Jill, and D. J. Angelone. 2016. “Equality, Empowerment, and Choice: What Does Feminism Mean to Contemporary Women?” Journal of Gender Studies 25 (4): 445–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott, Verity. 2020. ”Connective Crowds: The Organizational Strcuture of a Feminist Crowd in the #TakeDownJulienBlanc Campaign.” In From sit-ins to #Revolutions: Media and the Changing Nature of Protests, edited by, Olivia Guntarik and Verity Trott, 141–156. New York, New York, USA: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Zeynep. 2014. “The Medium and the Movement: Digital Tools, Social Movement Politics, and the End of the Free Rider Problem.” Policy & Internet 6 (2): 202–208.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, Connecticut, USA: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waseem, Zeerak. 2016. Are You a Racist or Am I Seeing Things? Annotator Influence on Hate Speech Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science. Austin, Texas: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Scott, Verity Trott, and Callum Jones. 2020. “The Pussy Ain’t Worth It, Bro’: Assessing the Discourse and Structure of MGTOW.” Information, Communication and Society 23 (6): 908–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong, Ying, Moonhee Cho, and Brandon Boatwright. 2019. “Hashtag Activism and Message Frames Among Social Movement Organizations: Semantic Network Analysis and Thematic Analysis of Twitter During The# Metoo Movement.” Public Relations Review 45 (1): 10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar