Advanced search
Publication Cover
Feminist Media Studies Volume 23, 2023 - Issue 8
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,321
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary and Criticism

The invisible women: uncovering gender bias in AI-generated images of professionals

Anna M. Gorskaa Human Resources Department, Kozminski University, Warsaw, PolandCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-5454View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Dariusz Jemielniakb Management in Networked and Digital Environments (MINDS) Kozminski University, Warszawa, PolandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3745-7931View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 4370-4375 | Received 28 Apr 2023, Accepted 21 Sep 2023, Published online: 03 Oct 2023

References

  • Buolamwini, Joy, and Timnit. Gebru 2018. “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification”. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, New York City, NY, 81: 77–91.
  • Costanza-Chock, Sasha. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Cambridge: The MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/12255.001.0001.
  • D’Ignazio, C., and L. F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Dinh, Trang Thi Quynh, and Janne. Tienari. 2022. “Brothers and Broken Dreams: Men, Masculinity, and Emotions in Platform Capitalism.” Gender, Work, and Organization 29 (2): 609–625. doi:10.1111/gwao.12786.
  • Ellemers, Naomi. 2018. “Gender Stereotypes.” Annual Review of Psychology 69 (1): 275–298. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719.
  • Feng, Yunghe, and Chirag. Shah 2022. “Has CEO Gender Bias Really Been Fixed? Adversarial Attacking and Improving Gender Fairness in Image Search.” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, 36( 11): 11882–11890.
  • Global Teacher Status Index. 2018. Retrieved online from: https://www.varkeyfoundation.org/media/4790/gts-index-9-11-2018.pdf.
  • Gomez-Herrera, Estrella, and Sabine. Köszegi 2022. A Gender Perspective on Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: The Vicious Cycle of Digital Inequality. Working Paper, Bruegel.
  • Hanemaayer, Ariane. 2020. Artificial Intelligence and Its Discontents: Critiques from the Social Sciences and Humanities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hicks, Mar. 2021. “Sexism is a Feature, Not a Bug.” In Your Computer is on Fire, edited by Thomas Mullaney, Benjamin Peters, Mar Hicks, and Kavita Philip, 135–158. Cambridge: The MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/10993.003.0011.
  • Jimena, Escudero Pérez. 2020. “’an AI Doesn’t Need a gender’ (But It’s Still Assigned One): Paradigm Shift of the Artificially Created Woman in Film.” Feminist Media Studies 20 (3): 393–408. doi:10.1080/14680777.2019.1615973.
  • Liang, Lizhen, and Daniel. Acuna 2020. “Artificial Mental Phenomena: Psychophysics as a Framework to Detect Perception Biases in AI Models.” In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 403–412). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Noble, Safiya Umola. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. 1st ed. New York: NYU Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5.
  • Noble, Safiya Umola., and Sarah. Roberts 2019. “Technological Elites, the Meritocracy, and Postracial Myths in Silicon Valley.” In RACISM POSTRACE. UCLA. Report #: 6. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7z3629nh.
  • OECD. 2021. Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators, Doctors (By Age, Sex and Category. https://www.oecd.org/gender/data/the-proportion-of-female-doctors-has-increased-in-alloecd-countries-over-the-past-two-decades.htm.
  • O’Neil, C. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. 1st ed. New York: Crown.
  • Wajcman, Judy. 2000. “Reflections on Gender and Technology Studies.: In What State is the Art?” Social Studies of Science 30 (3): 447–464. doi:10.1177/030631200030003005.
  • Walby, Sylvia. 2011. “Is the Knowledge Society Gendered?” Gender, Work and Organization 18 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00532.x.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.