Beauty, baby and backlash? Anti-feminist influencers on TikTok

References

• Adams, Julianne. 2022. “The Quirky Intimacy of Femme Mental Health Memes.” Feminist Media Studies 22 (7): 1712–1728. doi:10.1080/14680777.2021.1901761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakardjieva, Maria. 2015. “Do Clouds Have Politics? Collective Actors in Social Media Land.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (8): 983–990. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum, Rebekka. 2019. Angst um die Vormachtstellung: Zum Begriff und zur Geschichte des deutschen Antifeminismus. Hamburg: Marta Press UG.
   Google Scholar
• Boffone, Trevor. 2022. “Introduction.” In TikTok Cultures in the United States, edited by Trevor Boffone, 1–13. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, Andrew. 2017. The Hybrid Media System. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Winnie. 2022. “The Monstrous-Feminine in the Incel Imagination: Investigating the Representation of Women as “Femoids” On/R/Braincels.” Feminist Media Studies 22 (2): 254–270. doi:10.1080/14680777.2020.1804976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, Shanti. 2023. “Andrew Tate Arrest: TikTok and Twitter Under Fire Over False Posts from Fans.” The Guardian, January 1, 2023. Accessed January 11, 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2023/jan/01/fans-andrew-tate-king-of-toxic-masculinity-flood-web-arrest.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Jenny L. 2020. How Artifacts Afford: The Power and Politics of Everyday Things: Design Thinking, Design Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dekoninck, Heleen, and Desirée Schmuck. 2022. “The Mobilizing Power of Influencers for Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions and Political Participation.” Environmental Communication 16 (4): 458–472. doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2027801.
   Google Scholar
• Di Sabato, Bruna, and Bronwen Hughes. 2021. “Back to the Future?” Anglistica AION: An Interdisciplinary Journal 24 (1): 25–40. doi:10.6093/2035-8504/8831.
   Google Scholar
• Ging, Debbie. 2019. “Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere.” Men and Masculinities 22 (4): 638–657. doi:10.1177/1097184X17706401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruwell, Leigh. 2020. “Feminist Research on the Toxic Web: The Ethics of Access, Affective Labour, and Harassment.” In Digital Ethics Rhetoric and Responsibility in Online Aggression, edited by Jessica Reyman and Erika M. Sparby, 87–103. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429266140-6.
   Google Scholar
• Hanckel, Benjamin, Son Vivienne, Paul Byron, Brady Robards, and Brendan Churchill. 2019. “‘That’s Not Necessarily for Them’: LGBTIQ+ Young People, Social Media Platform Affordances and Identity Curation.” Media, Culture & Society 41 (8): 1261–1278. doi:10.1177/0163443719846612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Xiaoting, and Chenjun Yin. 2022. “Mapping the Manosphere. Categorization of Reactionary Masculinity Discourses in Digital Environment.” Feminist Media Studies 23 (5): 1923–1940. doi:10.1080/14680777.2021.1998185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautea, Samantha, Perry Parks, Bruno Takahashi, and Jing Zeng. 2021. “Showing They Care (Or Don’t): Affective Publics and Ambivalent Climate Activism on TikTok.” Social Media + Society 7 (2): 205630512110123. doi:10.1177/20563051211012344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höcker, Charlotte, Pickel Gert, and Decker. Oliver. 2020. “Antifeminismus – das Geschlecht im Autoritarismus? Die Messung von Antifeminismus und Sexismus in Deutschland auf der Einstellungsebene.” In Autoritäre Dynamiken. Neue Radikalität – alte Ressentiments. Leipziger Autoritarismus-Studie 2020, edited by Oliver Decker and Elmar Brähler, 249–282. Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag. doi:10.30820/9783837977714-249.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Mingyi. 2019. “Social Media Celebrity and the Institutionalization of YouTube.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 25 (3): 534–553. doi:10.1177/1354856517750368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, Carey. 2016. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. 2nd edn ed. London/New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jha, Chandan Kumar, and Oasis Kodila-Tedika. 2020. “Does Social Media Promote Democracy? Some Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Policy Modeling 42 (2): 271–290. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachorsky, Danielle, and Alexandria Perez. 2021. “Julián is a Mermaid. Challenging Gender Stereotypes a Qualitative Multimodal Content Analysis.” In A Multimodal Approach to Challenging Gender Stereotypes in Children’s Picture Books, 1st edn edited by, A. Jesús Moya-Guijarro and Eija Ventola, 23–41. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003145875.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, Ulrike, and Jakob Svensson. 2015. “The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach.” New Media & Society 17 (8): 1241–1257. doi:10.1177/1461444814522952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, Ulrike, and Jakob Svensson. 2016. “Network Media LOGIC: Some Conceptual Considerations.” In The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics, edited by Axel Bruns, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbø, Anders Olof Larsson, and Christian Christensen, 23–38. 1st edn. ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, Robert. 2020. Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research. 3rd edn ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4324/9781003001430-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 2016. “What is Mode?” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Carey Jewitt, 60–71. 2nd edn. ed. London/New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, Juliane, and Christoph Fritzsche. 2018. “Backlash, neoreaktionäre Politiken oder Antifeminismus? Forschende Perspektiven auf aktuelle Debatten um Geschlecht.” Feministische Studien 36 (2): 335–346. doi:10.1515/fs-2018-0036.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, Juliane, and Ulrich Peters. 2018. “Antifeminismus in Deutschland: Einführung und Einordnung des Phänomens.” In Antifeminismus in Bewegung, Aktuelle Debatten um Geschlecht und sexuelle Vielfalt, edited by Juliane Lang and Ulrich Peters, 13–35. Hamburg: Marta Press UG.
   Google Scholar
• Leidig, Eviane, and Gabriel Bayarri. 2023. “Not Your Grandma’s Fascism: Fame, Femininity, and Race in Far-Right Postcolonial India and Brazil.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 30 (1): 239–267. doi:10.1093/sp/jxac013.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Rebecca. 2018. “Alternative Influence: Broadcasting the Reactionary Right on YouTube.” Data & Society Research Institute. Accessed January 11, 2023. https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/DS_Alternative_Influence.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Maly, Ico. 2019. “New Right Metapolitics and the Algorithmic Activism of Schild & Vrienden.” Social Media + Society 5 (2): 205630511985670. doi:10.1177/2056305119856700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maly, Ico. 2020. “Metapolitical New Right Influencers: The Case of Brittany Pettibone.” Social Sciences 9 (7): 113. doi:10.3390/socsci9070113.
   Google Scholar
• Mattheis, Ashley A. 2021. “#tradculture: Reproducing Whiteness and Neo-Fascism Through Gendered Discourse Online.” In Shona Hunter and Christi van der Westhuizenedited byRoutledge Handbook of Critical Studies in Whiteness1st edn., 91–101.London:Routledge.10.4324/9780429355769-7.
   Google Scholar
• Meiering, David, Aziz Dziri, Naika Foroutan, Simon Teune, Esther Lehnert, and Marwan Abou Taam. 2018. Brückennarrative - Verbindende Elemente für die Radikalisierung von Gruppen. PRIF Report 7/2018. Frankfurt/M: Leibniz-Institut hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung (HSFK)/Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF).
   Google Scholar
• Miguel, Cristina. 2018. “Conclusions: Networked Intimacy.” In Personal Relationships and Intimacy in the Age of Social Media, 125–133. Cham: Palgrave Pivot. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02062-0_7.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, Susan. 2018. “Fake News, Disinformation, Manipulation and Online Tactics to Undermine Democracy.” Journal of Cyber Policy 3 (1): 39–43. doi:10.1080/23738871.2018.1462395.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nagle, Angela. 2017. Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4Chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. Winchester: Zero-Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norocel, Ov Cristian. 2022. “Gendering Web2.0 Sociotechnical Affordances of Far-Right Metapolitics.” Social Media + Society 8 (3): 205630512211080. doi:10.1177/20563051221108076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, Aihwa. 2011. “Introduction: Worlding Cities, or the Art of Being Global.” In Ananya Roy and Aihwa Ongedited byWorlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global1st edn., 1–26.Sussex:Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444346800.ch.
   Google Scholar
• Otsuki, Grant Jun, Shiho Satsuka, Keiichi Omura, and Atsurō Morita. 2020. “Introduction.” In The World Multiple: The Quotidian Politics of Knowing and Generating Entangled Worlds, edited by Keiichi Omura, Grant Jun Otsuki, Shiho Satsuka, and Atsurō Morita, 1–17. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, Shauna, and Miriam Field. 2022. “Watching TikTok, Feeling Feminism.” In TikTok Cultures in the United States, edited by Trevor Boffone, 61–71. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003280705-8.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, Shakuntala. 2018. “Making of Selfie Nationalism: Narendra Modi, the Paradigm Shift to Social Media Governance, and Crisis of Democracy.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 42 (2): 166–183. doi:10.1177/0196859917754053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedl, Martin J., Josephine Lukito, and Samuel C. Woolley. 2023. “Political Influencers on Social Media: An Introduction.” Social Media + Society 9 (2): 205630512311779. doi:10.1177/20563051231177938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, Harry, and Emily Christine Lloyd-Evans. 2021. “Intimate Snapshots: TikTok, Algorithm and the Recreation of Identity.” Anthways 1 (1). doi:10.5281/zenodo.5515620.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Richard. 2018. “Otherwise Engaged: Social Media from Vanity Metrics to Critical Analytics.” International Journal of Communication 12 (2018): 450–472.
   Google Scholar
• Rösch, Viktoria. 2022. “Ressentimentale Politik: Rekonstruktion Medialer Gefühlsarbeit (Neu-)Rechter Frauen.” Sozialer Sinn 23 (1): 73–104. doi:10.1515/sosi-2022-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Schmuck, Desirée, Melanie Hirsch, Anja Stevic, and Jörg Matthes. 2022. “Politics – Simply Explained? How Influencers Affect Youth’s Perceived Simplification of Politics, Political Cynicism, and Political Interest.” The International Journal of Press/politics 27 (3): 738–762. doi:10.1177/19401612221088987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafini, Frank, and Stephanie F. Reid. 2019. “Multimodal Content Analysis: Expanding Analytical Approaches to Content Analysis.” Visual Communication 147035721986413. doi:10.1177/1470357219864133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, Sujatha. 2021. “Bahujan girls’ Anti-Caste Activism on TikTok.” Feminist Media Studies 21 (1): 154–156. doi:10.1080/14680777.2021.1864875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tebaldi, Catherine. 2021. “Make Women Great Again: Women, Misogyny and Anti-Capitalism on the Right.” Fast Capitalism 18 (1). doi:10.32855/fcapital.202101.007.
   Google Scholar
• Trend, David. 2013. Worlding: Identity, Media, and Imagination in a Digital Age. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Yilei, and Dezheng Feng. 2022. “Identity Performance and Self-Branding in Social Commerce: A Multimodal Content Analysis of Chinese Wanghong Women’s Video-Sharing Practice on TikTok.” Discourse, Context & Media 50: 100652. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimann, Gabriel, and Natalie Masri. 2021. “TikTok’s Spiral of Antisemitism.” Journalism and Media 2 (4): 697–708. doi:10.3390/journalmedia2040041.
   Google Scholar
• Zulli, Diana, and David James Zulli. 2020. “Extending the Internet Meme: Conceptualizing Technological Mimesis and Imitation Publics on the TikTok Platform.” New Media & Society 24 (8): 1872–1890. doi:10.1177/1461444820983603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar