Digitalizing sexual citizenship: LGBTI+ resistance at digital spaces in pandemic times

References

• Abidin, Crystal. 2021. “From ‘Networked publics’ to ‘Refracted publics’: A Companion Framework for Researching ‘Below the radar’ Studies.” Social Media+ Society 7 (1): 2056305120984458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Sara. 2004. “Affective economies.” Social Text 22 (2): 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• Altay, Tunay. 2022. “The Pink Line Across Digital Publics: Political Homophobia and the Queer Strategies of Everyday Life During COVID-19 in Turkey.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 29 (1_suppl): 60S–74S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arat, Yesim. 2010. “Women’s Rights and Islam in Turkish Politics: The Civil Code Amendment.” The Middle East Journal 64 (2): 235–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artieri, Boccia, Stefano Brilli Giovanni, and Elisabetta Zurovac. 2021. “Below the Radar: Private Groups, Locked Platforms, and Ephemeral Content—Introduction to the Special Issue.” Social Media+ Society 7 (1): 2056305121988930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atalay, Özlem, and Petra L. Doan. 2019. “Reading the LGBT Movement Through Its Spatiality in Istanbul, Turkey.” Geography Research Forum 39: 106–126.
   Google Scholar
• Bayramoğlu, Yener. 2021. “Remembering Hope: Mediated Queer Futurity and Counterpublics in Turkey’s Authoritarian Times.” New Perspectives on Turkey 64: 173–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, David, and Jon Binnie. 2000. The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, Seyla.2013. “Turkey’s Authoritarian Turn” The New York Times. Accessed December 20. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/04/opinion/turkeys-authoritarian-turn.html
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Danah.2010. “Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications.” In A networked self, edited by Zizi Papacharissi, 47–66. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulut, Ergin, and Erdem Yörük. 2017. “Digital Populism: Trolls and Political Polarization of Twitter in Turkey.” International Journal of Communication 11: 25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çağatay, Selin, Mia Liinason, and Olga Sasunkevich. 2022. Feminist and LGBTI+ Activism Across Russia, Scandinavia and Turkey. Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-84451-6.
   Google Scholar
• Caliandro, Alessadro. 2018. “Digital Methods for Ethnography: Analytical Concepts for Ethnographers Exploring Social Media Environments.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 47 (5): 551–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, Ozgur. 2021. “Digital Pride on the Streets of the Internet: Facebook and Twitter Practices of the LGBTI Movement in Turkey.” Sexuality & Culture 25 (4): 1447–1468.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Kathy. 2013. Reshaping the Female Body: The Dilemma of Cosmetic Surgery. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erol, Ali E. 2018. “Queer contestation of neoliberal and heteronormative moral geographies during #occupygezi.” Sexualities 21 (3): 428–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, David T. 1993. Sexual Citizenship: The Material Construction of Sexualities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, Angela Cora, Alecea I Standlee, Jennifer Bechkoff, and Yan Cui. 2009. “Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38 (1): 52–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gökarıksel, Banu, Christoper Neubert, and Sara Smith. 2019. “Demographic Fever Dreams: Fragile Masculinity and Population Politics in the Rise of the Global Right.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 44 (3): 561–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görkemli, Serkan. 2012. “Coming Out of the Internet: Lesbian and Gay Activism and the Internet as a ‘Digital Closet’ in Turkey.” Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 8 (3): 63–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunitsky, Seva. 2015. “Corrupting the Cyber-Commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (1): 42–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J.2023. “A Cyborg Manifesto: An ironic dream of a common language for women in the integrated circuit.” In The Transgender Studies Reader Remix, edited by Susan Stryker and Dylan McCarthy Blackson, 429–443. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, Claire. 2012. “Affective Solidarity: Feminist Reflexivity and Political Transformation.” Feminist Theory 13 (2): 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, Christine.2017. “From virtual ethnography to the embedded, embodied, everyday internet.” In The Routledge companion to digital ethnography, edited by Larissa Hjorth, Heather Horst, Anne Galloway, and Genevieve Bell, 47–54. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, Engin F.2008. “Theorising Acts of Citizenship.” In Acts of citizenship, edited by E. F. Isin and G. M. Nielsen. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Sarah J, Moya Bailey, and Brooke Foucault Welles. 2020. # HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. London: Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kilic, Onur.2023. “‘Every Parade of Ours is a Pride Parade’: Exploring LGBTI+ Digital Activism in Turkey.” Sexualities 26 (7): 731–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Yeran. 2010. “The Affective Public Sphere.” Media & Society 18 (3): 146–191.
   Google Scholar
• Kouri-Towe, Natalie. 2015. “Textured Activism: Affect Theory and Transformational Politics in Transnational Queer Palestine-Solidarity Activism.” Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture, and Social Justice 37 (1): 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Köylü, Hilal. 2020. “Korona Günlerinde Diyanet’e ‘Nefret Suçu’ Tepkisi”. Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/tr/korona-günlerinde-diyanete-nefret-suçu-tepkisi/a-53260541
   Google Scholar
• Kroløkke, Charlotte Halmø. 2014. “West is Best: Affective Assemblages and Spanish Oöcytes.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 21 (1): 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liinason Mia, Selin Çağatay, and Olga Sasunkevich. 2023. “Varieties of exceptionalism: A conversation.” In Transforming identities in Contemporary Europe, edited by Elisabeth L Engebretsen and Mia Liinason. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lünenborg, Margreth.2019. “Affective publics: Understanding the dynamic formation of public articulations beyond the public sphere.” In Public spheres of resonance, edited by Anne Fleig and Christian von Scheve, 29–48. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, Jose Esteban. 2009. “From Surface to Depth, between Psychoanalysis and Affect.” Women & Performance: a Journal of Feminist Theory 19 (2): 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, Jose Esteban.2019. Cruising Utopia. 10th Anniversary ed. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozban, Esra.2022. “New Channels in Digital Activism: Lubunya Digital Cultures in Turkey.” In LGBTQ Digital Cultures: A Global Perspective, edited by Paromita Pain, 130–143. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Özbay, Cenk, and Evren Savcı. 2018. “Queering Commons in Turkey.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian & Gay Studies 24 (4): 516–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özduzen, Ozge, and Umut Korkut. 2020. “Enmeshing the Mundane and the Political: Twitter, LGBTI+ Outing and Macro-Political Polarisation in Turkey.” Contemporary Politics 26 (5): 493–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizi.2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postill, John, and Sarah Pink. 2012. “Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web.” Media International Australia 145 (1): 123–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puar, Jasbir. 2017. Terrorist assemblages : Homonationalism in Queer Times. 10th anniversary expanded ed. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, Jasbir.2020. “‘I would rather be a cyborg than a goddess’: Becoming-intersectional in assemblage theory.” In Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives, edited by Carole McCann, Seung-kyung Kim, and Emek Ergun, 405–415. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pride, Istanbul. 2020a.”neredesinlubunya.com”. Accessed July 2, 2020. http://neredesinlubunya.com
   Google Scholar
• Pride, Istanbul. 2020b.”neredesinlubunya.com”. Accessed July 2, 2020. http://neredesinlubunya.com/
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Diane. 2017. “Rethinking Sexual Citizenship.” Sociology 51 (2): 208–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabsay, Leticia. 2012. “The Emergence of the Other Sexual Citizen: Orientalism and the Modernisation of Sexuality.” Citizenship Studies 16 (5–6): 605–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savcı, Evren.2020. Queer in Translation: Sexual Politics Under Neoliberal Islam. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. Touching Feeling. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selek, Pınar. 2001. Maskeler Süvariler Gacılar: Ülker Sokak: Bir Altkültürün Dişlanma Mekanı [Masks, Troopers, Women: Ülker Street a Place for the Social Exclusion of a Subculture]. Vol. 8. Istanbul: Ayizi.
   Google Scholar
• Selen, Eser. 2012. “The Stage: A Space for Queer Subjectification in Contemporary Turkey.” Gender, Place & Culture 19 (6): 730–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirman, Olgu. 2013. “The Making of Familial Citizenship in Turkey.” In Citizenship in A Global World: European Questions and Turkish Experiences, edited by F. Keyman and A. Icduygu, 147–172. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stella, Francesca. 2015. Lesbian Lives in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia: Post/Socialism and Gendered Sexualities. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tiidenberg, Katrin, Natalie Ann Hendry, and Crystal Abidin. 2021. Tumblr. Cornwall: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Topak, Ozgun E. 2019. “The Authoritarian Surveillant Assemblage: Authoritarian State Surveillance in Turkey.” Security Dialogue 50 (5): 454–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Zeynep. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Joe. 2016. “(En)gendering the Political: Citizenship from Marginal Spaces.” Citizenship Studies 20 (2): 141–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ünan, Aydın D. 2015. “Gezi Protests and the LGBT Rights Movement: A Relation in Motion.” In Creativity and Humour in Occupy Movements: Intellectual Disobedience in Turkey and Beyond, edited by Ayşe Yalcintas, 75–94. London: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, Andreas, and Nina Glick Schiller. 2002. “Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation–State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences.” Global Networks 2 (4): 301–334.
   Google Scholar
• Yasemin, Inceoğlu and Savas Çoban. 2015. “Sokak ve Dijital Aktivizm: Eylemin Sokaktan Siber Uzaya Taşınması ya da Vice Versa.” In İnternet ve Sokak: Sosyal Medyada Dijital Aktivizm ve Eylem, edited by Yasemin Inceoğlu and Savas Çoban, 19–72. İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, Işık, and Gulnur Bashirov. 2018. “The AKP after 15 Years: Emergence of Erdoganism in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly 39 (9): 1812–1830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. “Women, Citizenship and Difference.” Feminist review 57 (1): 4–27.
   Google Scholar