The influence of ground rules on Chinese students’ learning of critical thinking in group work: a cultural perspective

References

• Anderson, T., C. Howe, R. Soden, J. Halliday, and J. Low. 2001. “Peer Interaction and the Learning of Critical Thinking Skills in Further Education Students.” Instructional Science 29 (1): 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, D. 1976. From Communication to Curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1981. “Codes, Modalities, and the Process of Cultural Reproduction: A Model.” Language in Society 10 (03): 327–363.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 1998. “Learning from the Confucian Heritage: So Size doesn't Matter?” International Journal of Educational Research 29: 723–738.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, C.-N. 1992. Thick Face, Black Heart: The Path to Thriving, Winning & Succeeding: Warner Books, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. C. 1990. Taoism: The Way of the Mystic. rev ed. San Bernardino, CA: Borgo.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Development Council and Hong Kong Examination and Assessment Authority (CDC/HKEAA). 2007. Liberal Studies: Curriculum and Assessment Guide (Secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Education Bureau. Accessed October 19, 2012. http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content_5941/ls_e_070307.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dawes, L., N. Mercer, and R. Wegerif. 2000. Thinking Together: A Programme of Activities for Developing Thinking Skills at KS2. Birmingham, AL: Questions Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Education and Manpower Bureau (EMB). 2005. The New Academic Structure for Senior Secondary Education and Higher Education – Action Plan for Investing in the Future of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: EMB. Accessed February 22, 2007. http://www.emb.gov.hk/FileManager/EN/Content_4745/report_e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., and N. Mercer. 1987. Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom. London: Methuen/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, R. H. 1987. “A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities.” In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, edited by J. B. Barton and R. J. Sternberg, 9–26. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R. T. and T. Fang. 2006. “Assessing the Impact of Culture on Relationship Creation and Network Formation in Emerging Asian Markets.” European Journal of Marketing 40 (3): 430–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, L. 1998. “A Cultural Perspective on Group Work.” ELT Journal 52 (4): 323–329.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, C. L. 2012. Group Work and the Learning of Critical Thinking in Liberal Studies in Hong Kong Secondary Schools. Unpublished Thesis: The University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, C. L., and C. Howe. 2012. “Liberal Studies in Hong Kong: A New Perspective on Critical Thinking through Group Work.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 7 (2): 101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, C. L., and W. Y. Yip. 2010. “The Policies of Reintroducing Liberal Studies into Hong Kong Secondary Schools.” Educational Research for Policies and Practice. 9: 17–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, G., S. Ting-Toomey, and W. B. Gudykunst. 1996. “Chinese Communication Processes.” In The Handbook of Chinese Psychology, edited by M. H. Bond, 280–293. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M., and M. Haynes. 2011. “Increasing Explanatory Behaviour, Problem-Solving, and Reasoning within Classes Using Cooperative Group Work.” Instructional Science 39 (3): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henri, F. 1992. “Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers.” In Computer Conferencing and Content Analysis, edited by En a. Kaye Kaye, 117–136. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region Government of. 2011. Rules of Procedure of the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Hong Kong: Government Printer. Accessed February 5, 2013. http://www.legco.gov.hk/general/english/procedur/content/rop.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, G. 2005. Establishing Rules, Goals and Expectations. Managing Your Classroom. Accessed November 2, 2012. http://managingyourclassroom.wikispaces.com/Establishing+Rules,+Goals+%26+Expectations
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., and N. Mercer. 2007. Children’s Social Development, Peer Interaction and Classroom Learning (Review Report 2/16). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, K. 2013. “Educational Modes of Thinking in Neo-Confucianism: A Traditional Lens for Rethinking Modern Education.” Asia Pacific Education Review 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner, R., and S. Jones. 2003. “The Effects of Communication Medium on Argumentation and the Development of Critical Thinking.” International Journal of Educational Research 39 (8): 861–871.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K. J., J. K. S. Chan, P. K. Fok, and W. M. Yu. 2008. “Forms of Assessment and Their Potential for Enhancing Learning: Conceptual and Cultural Issues.” Educational Research for Policy and Practice 7 (1): 197–207.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkbride, P. S., S. F. Y. Tang, and R. I. Westwood. 1991. “Chinese Conflict Preferences and Negotiating Behaviour: Cultural and Psychological Influences.” Organization Studies 12 (3): 365–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, S., N. Vehring, and M. Kramer. 2010. Introducing Real Time Communication: Frames, Modes & Rules. Proceedings of the 23rd Bled EConference on ETrust: Implications for the Individual, Enterprise and Society 1 1: 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 1991. The Skills of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambirth, A. 2006. “Challenging the Laws of Talk: Ground Rules, Social Reproduction and the Curriculum.” The Curriculum Journal 17 (1): 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Lambirth, A. 2009. “Ground Rules for Talk: The Acceptable Face of Prescription.” The Curriculum Journal 20 (4): 423–435.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., N. Mercer, L. Dawes, R. Wegerif, D. Rowe, and C. Sams. 2005. “Talking and Thinking Together at Key Stage 1.” Early Years 25 (1): 167–182.
   Google Scholar
• McPeck, J. E. 1981. Critical Thinking and Education. Oxford: Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 1994. “The Quality of Talk in Children's Joint Activity at the Computer.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 10 (1): 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 1995. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 1996. “The Quality of Talk in Children’s Collaborative Activity in the Classroom.” Learning and Instruction 6 (4): 359–377.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2000. Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., M. Fernandez, L. Dawes, R. Wegerif, and C. Sams. 2003. “Talk about Texts at the Computer: Using ICT to Develop Children's Oral and Literate Abilities.” Reading 37 (2): 81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• QSR. 2001. QSR NVIVO. Melbourne: QSR International Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S., and J. Alatorre. 1994. The Development of Independent Problem Solving in Pre-School Children. In Explorations in Socio-Cultural Studies, Vol. 3: Teaching. Learning and Interaction. edited by. N. Mercer and C. Coli, 161–175. Madrid: Fundacion lnfancia y Aprendizaje.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S., and N. Mercer. 2003. “Scaffolding the Development of Effective Collaboration and Learning.” International Journal of Educational Research 39 (1): 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurðsson, G. 2012. “Li 禮, Ritual and Pedagogy: A Cross-cultural Exploration.” Sophia 51 (2): 227–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatum, B. D. 1992. “Talking about Race, Leaming about Radsm: The Application of Radal Identity Development Theory in the Classroom.” Harvard Educational Review 62 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., J. P. Linares, S. Rojas-Drummond, N. Mercer, and M. Velez. 2005. “Thinking Together in the UK and Mexico: Transfer of an Educational Innovation.” Journal of Classroom Interaction 40 (1): 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R., N. Mercer, and L. Dawes. 1999. “From Social Interaction to Individual Reasoning: An Empirical Investigation of a Possible Socio-cultural Model of Cognitive Development.” Learning and Instruction 9 (6): 493–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, S. S. 1948. “Empowering Education: Teaching Argumentative Writing to Cultural Minority Middle-School Students.” Research in the Teaching of English 33 (1): 49–83.
   Google Scholar
• Zeineddin, A., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2010. “Scientific Reasoning and Epistemological Commitments: Coordination of Theory and Evidence among College Science Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (9): 1064–1093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar