‘Just write anything’: exploring the school literacy practices of high school students in the United Arab Emirates

References

• Abrams, S. S. 2015. “Digital Resources, Reflexive Pedagogy, and Empowered Learning.” In A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Learning by Design, edited by B. Cope and M. Kalantzis, 37–48. Hampshire: Palgrave. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724.
   Google Scholar
• Aljanahi, M. H. 2017. “Exploring the Rhizomatic Literacy Practices of UAE High Schoolers.” PhD diss., United Arab Emirates University.
   Google Scholar
• Aljanahi, M. H. 2019. “‘You Could Say I’m a Hardcore Fan of Dragon Ball Z’: Affinity Spaces, Multiliteracies, and the Negotiation of Identity.” Literacy Research and Instruction 58 (1): 31–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2018.1520940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, D., and M. Hamilton. 1998. Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, H. R., and G. W. Ryan. 2010. Analyzing Qualitative Data: Systematic Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, D., and K. Clinton. 2002. “Limits of the Local: Expanding Perspectives on Literacy as a Social Practice.” Journal of Literacy Research 34 (3): 337–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., and V. Braun. 2013. “Teaching Thematic Analysis: Overcoming Challenges and Developing Strategies for Effective Learning.” The Psychologist 26 (2): 120–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J., and R. K. Blot. 2003. Literacy and Literacies: Texts, Power, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis. 2009. “‘Multiliteracies’: New Literacies, New Learning.” Pedagogies: an International Journal 4 (3): 164–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis. 2013. “Towards a New Learning: The Scholar Social Knowledge Workspace, in Theory and Practice.” E-learning and Digital Media 10 (4): 332–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.4.332.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis. 2015. “The Things You Do to Know: An Introduction to the Pedagogy of Multiliteracies.” In A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Learning by Design, edited by B. Cope and M. Kalantzis, 1–36. Hampshire: Palgrave. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., M. Kalantzis, and S. S. Abrams. 2017. “Meaning-Making and Learning in the Era of Digital Text.” In Remixing Multiliteracies: Theory and Practice from New London to New Times, edited by F. Serafini and E. Gee, 35–49. New York: NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagood, M. C., D. E. Alvermann, and A. Heron-Hruby. 2010. Bring It to Class: Unpacking Pop Culture in Literacy Learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbert, K., M. Ott, and L. Iannacci. 2015. “Co-Constructed by Design: Knowledge Processes in a Fluid ‘cloud Curriculum.’.” In A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Learning by Design, edited by B. Cope and M. Kalantzis, 127–141. Hampshire: Palgrave. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G., and K. Schultz. 2001. “Literacy and Learning Out of School: A Review of Theory and Research.” Review of Educational Research 71 (4): 575–611. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071004575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, G. A., and K. Schultz, eds. 2002. School’s Out: Bridging Out-Of-School Literacies with Classroom Practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., and B. Cope. 2000. “A Multiliteracies Pedagogy: A Pedagogical Supplement.” In Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, edited by B. Cope and M. Kalantzis, 239–248. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., B. Cope, E. Chan, and L. Dalley-Trim. 2016. Literacies. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 1996. InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B. 2002. “Re-framing Adolescent Literacy Research for New Times: Studying Youth as a Resource.” Literacy Research and Instruction 41 (3): 211–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/19388070209558367.
   Google Scholar
• Mór, W. M. 2015. “Learning by Design: Reconstructing Knowledge Processes in Teaching and Learning Practices.” In A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Learning by Design, edited by B. Cope and M. Kalantzis, 186–209. Hampshire: Palgrave. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, K. H. 2012. “What Is Literacy?–A Critical Overview of Sociocultural Perspectives.” Journal of Language and Literacy Education 8 (1): 50–71.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell-Gates, V., J. Anderson, K. Jang, M. Gagne, K. Lenters, and M. McTavish. 2012. “Measuring Situated Literacy Activity: Challenges and Promises.” Journal of Literacy Research 44 (4): 396–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12457167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, P. C., and M. Jimenez-Silva. 2015. “The Intersectionality of Culturally Responsive Teaching and Performance Poetry: Validating Secondary Latino Youth and Their Community.” Multicultural Perspectives 17 (2): 87–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2015.1022448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., and C. Fuller. 2007. “‘As if You Heard It from Your Momma:’ Redesigning Histories of Participation with Literacy Education in an Adult Education Class.” In Reframing Socio-Cultural Research in Literacy: Identity, Agency and Power, edited by C. Lewis, P. A. Enciso, and E. Birr Moje, 75–113. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman, G. B., and S. F. Rallis. 1998. Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, L. 2015. “Examining the ‘tools of the Trade’: A Knowledge Process Approach to Materials Analysis and Materials Evaluation.” In A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Learning by Design, edited by B. Cope and M. Kalantzis, 186–209. Hampshire: Palgrave. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137539724.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., and H. R. Bernard. 2003. “Techniques to Identify Themes.” Field Methods 15 (1): 85–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569.
   Google Scholar
• Slota, S. T., M. F. Young, W. I. O’Byrne, and K. Ballestrini. 2016. “A New Hope: Negotiating the Integration of Transmedia Storytelling and Literacy Instruction.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 59 (6): 642–646. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.512.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 2003. “What’s ‘New’ in New Literacy Studies? Critical Approaches to Literacy in Theory and Practice.” Current Issues in Comparative Education 5 (2): 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. 1990. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. 1991. The Tact of Teaching: The Meaning of Pedagogical Thoughtfulness. London. Ont.: Althouse Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vasudevan, L., and M. Hill, eds. 2008. Media, Learning, and Sites of Possibility. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yerrick, R., and M. Ridgeway. 2017. “Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, Science Literacy, and Urban Underrepresented Science Students.” Inclusive Principles and Practices in Literacy Education 11: 87–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620170000011007.
   Google Scholar