Student voice research as a technology of reform in neoliberal times

References

• Anderson, A. 2015. “The Critical Purchase of Genealogy: Critiquing Student Participation Projects.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (1): 42–52. doi:10.1080/01596306.2013.828417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2003. “The Teacher’s Soul and the Terrors of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 18 (2): 215–228. doi:10.1080/0268093022000043065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2012. “Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: An I-Spy Guide to the Neoliberal University.” British Journal of Educational Studies 60 (1): 17–28. doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.650940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2016. “Neoliberal Education? Confronting the Slouching Beast.” Policy Futures in Education 14 (8): 1046–1059. doi:10.1177/1478210316664259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroutsis, A., G. McGregor, and M. Mills. 2016. “Pedagogic Voice: Student Voice in Teaching and Engagement Pedagogies.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 24 (1): 123–140. doi:10.1080/14681366.2015.1087044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2015. “What Is Education For? on Good Education, Teacher Judgement, and Educational Professionalism.” European Journal of Education 50 (1): 75–87. doi:10.1111/ejed.12109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, R., and J. Loveridge. 2016. “Beyond the Official Language of Learning: Teachers Engaging with Student Voice Research.” Teaching and Teacher Education 57: 59–66. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragg, S. 2007. ““Student Voice” and Governmentality: The Production of Enterprising Subjects?” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 28 (3): 34–358. doi:10.1080/01596300701458905.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J. 2014. “Learner Agency, Dispositionality and the New Zealand Curriculum Key Competencies.” New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work 11 (2): 175–186. doi:10.24135/teacherswork.v11i2.50.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., and D. Smardon. 2018. “A Typology of Agency in New Generation Learning Environments: Emerging Relational, Ecological and New Material Considerations.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 26 (1): 51–68. doi:10.1080/14681366.2017.1345975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., and E. Thomas. 2017. “Uncovering ‘Unwelcome Truths’ through Student Voice: Teacher Inquiry into Agency and Student Assessment Literacy.” Teaching Education 28 (2): 162–177. doi:10.1080/10476210.2016.1229291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codd, J. 2003. “Export Education and The Commercialisation Of Public Education in New Zealand.” The New Zealand Annual Review Of Education, no. 13 (January 2003). doi:10.26686/nzaroe.v0i13.1446.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C. P. 1989. “United Nations: Convention on the Rights of the Child.” International Legal Materials 28 (6): 1448–1476. doi:10.1017/S0020782900017228.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. 2004. “Ecology and Ethics in Participatory Collaborative Action Research: An Argument for the Authentic Participation of Students in Educational Research.” Educational Action Research 12 (3): 347–362. doi:10.1080/09650790400200255.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2013. “The Neoliberal Cascade and Education: An Essay on the Market Agenda and Its Consequences.” Critical Studies in Education 54 (2): 99–112. doi:10.1080/17508487.2013.776990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. 2011. “Assessment for Learning in the Accountability Era: New Zealand.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 71–77. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Czerniawski, G. 2012. “Repositioning Trust: A Challenge to Inauthentic Neoliberal Uses of Pupil Voice.” Management in Education 26 (3): 130–139. doi:10.1177/0892020612445685.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2006. “Subjectification: The Relevance of Butler’s Analysis for Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 27 (4): 425–438. doi:10.1080/01425690600802907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1988. “Technologies of the Self.” In Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, edited by L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, and P. H. Hutton, 16–49. Amherst, NY: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. 2006. “Authoritative, Accountable Positioning and Connected, General Knowing: Progressive Themes in Understanding Transfer.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (4): 537–547. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1504_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, J., and J. Brass. 2018. “Making Accountable Teachers: The Terrors and Pleasures of Performativity.” Journal of Education Policy 33 (3): 361–382. doi:10.1080/02680939.2017.1372636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. 2016. “Children of the Market: Performativity, Neoliberal Responsibilisation and the Construction of Student Identities.” Oxford Review of Education 42 (1): 108–122. doi:10.1080/03054985.2016.1142865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, R., and U. Thomas. 2015. “Concerning Collaboration: Teachers’ Perspectives on Working in Partnerships to Develop Teaching Practices.” Professional Development in Education 43 (1): 36–56. doi:10.1080/19415257.2015.1053570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, E. 2018. “Student Voice in School Reform: Desiring Simultaneous Critique and Affirmation.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. doi:10.1080/01596306.2018.1492517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2007. The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2010. National Standards. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. 2008. “Balancing Power in Communities of Practice: An Examination of Increasing Student Voice through School-based Youth-adult Partnerships.” Journal of Educational Change 9: 221–242. doi:10.1007/s10833-007-9061-7.
   Google Scholar
• Nairn, K. M., J. Higgins, and J. Sligo. 2012. Children of Rogernomics: A Neoliberal Generation Leaves School. Dunedin, New Zealand: Otago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. 2014a. “Enacting Student Voice through Governance Partnerships in the Classroom: Rupture of the Ordinary for Radical Practice.” FORUM 56 (1): 91–104. doi:10.2304/forum.2014.56.1.91.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. 2014b. “Is this student voice? Students and teachers re-negotiate power through governance partnerships in the classroom.” Phd thesis. University of Waikato. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/8846
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, E. 2015. “Opening up to Student Voice: Supporting Teacher Learning through Collaborative Action Research.” Learning Landscapes 8 (2): 285–299. doi:10.36510/learnland.v8i2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. 2008. “Governing Knowledge: Research Steering and Research Quality.” European Educational Research Journal 7 (3): 261–272. doi:10.2304/eerj.2008.7.3.261.
   Google Scholar
• Page, D. 2017. “Conceptualising the Surveillance of Teachers.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 38 (7): 991–1006. doi:10.1080/01425692.2016.1218752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, C., and C. Taylor. 2013. “Student Voice as Contested Practice: Power and Participation in Two Student Voice Projects.” Improving Schools 16 (1): 32–46. doi:10.1177/1365480212469713.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. 2011. “Coming to Terms with ‘Voice’.” In The Student Voice Handbook: Bridging the Academic/practitioner Divide, edited by G. Czerniawski and W. Kidd, 19–30. Bingley, UK: Emerald.
   Google Scholar