Exploring students’ explanations for off-task practices in an innovative learning environment (ILE) using a typology of agency as theoretical framework

References

• Arendt, H. 1958. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen, T., E. Elstad, and K. A. Christophersen. 2016. “Antecedents of Students’ Self-Regulatory Strength in Technology-Rich School Environments.” International Journal of Learning. Teaching and Educational Research. 15 (3): 218–241.
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen, T., E. Elstad, and K. A. Christophersen. 2017a. “Antecedents of Youth’s Beliefs about Agency and Online Learning.” Digital Culture & Education 9 (2): 98–117.
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen, T., E. Elstad, and K. A. Christophersen. 2017b. “Comparing Instructional Factors Related to Students’ Academic Self-Discipline in Norway and Finland.” Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE) 1 (1): 18–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1982. “Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency.” American Psychologist 37 (2): 122–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. 2006. “Interest and Self-Sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective.” Human Development 49 (4): 193–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 1999. “Vertical and Horizontal Discourse: An Essay.” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20 (2): 157–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., and M. Tedder. 2016. “Agency and Learning in the Lifecourse: Towards an Ecological Perspective.” Studies in the Education of Adults 39 (2): 132–149.
   Google Scholar
• Blikstad-Balas, M. 2012. “Digital Literacy in Upper Secondary School–what Do Students Use Their Laptops for during Teacher Instruction?” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 2 (7): 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I. 2015. “Assemblage Theory and Its Discontents.” Deleuze Studies 9 (3): 382–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., and D. Smardon. 2018. “A Typology of Agency in New Generation Learning Environments: Emerging Relational, Ecological and New Material Considerations.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 1 (26): 51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, A. H. C., and J. N. Choi. 2005. “Rethinking Procrastination: Positive Effects of “Active” Procrastination Behavior on Attitudes and Performance.” The Journal of Social Psychology 145 (3): 245–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., and P. Bansel. 2007. “Neoliberalism and Education.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 3 (20): 247–259.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 2012. “Self-Determination Theory.” In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, edited by P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, and E. T. Higgins, 416–436. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Research. 2006. Knowledge Promotion Curriculum. Oslo
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. 2012. Mindset: Changing the Way You Think to Fulfil Your Potential. London: Little Brown Book Group.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2005. “Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner.” International Journal of Educational Research 43 (3): 168–182.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2010. Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3969-9
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2011. “Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices: Relational agency and relational expertise in systems of distributed expertise.” International Journal of Educational Research 50 (1): 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Elstad, E. 2016. “Educational Technology in Schools.” In Digital Expectations and Experiences in Education, edited by E. Elstad, 47–58. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., & A. Mische. 1998. “What is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms, W., B. Cleveland, and K. Fisher, Eds. 2016. Evaluating Learning Environments. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Istance, D. 2015. Schooling Redesigned: Towards Innovative Learning Systems. Evaluative. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Istance, D., and M. Kools. 2013. “OECD Work on Technology and Education: Innovative Learning Environments as an Integrating Framework.” European Journal of Education 1 (48): 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M. 2010. Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., and L. A. Mazzei. 2016. “Thinking with an Agentic Assemblage in Posthuman Inquiry.” In Posthuman Research Practices in Education, edited by C. A. Taylor and C. Hughes, 93–107. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2013. Thinking Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar: Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, A., and S. Saltmarsh. 2016. “Bodies and Affect in Non-Traditional Learning Spaces.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 8 (49): 832–841.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. R. 2015. “The Ideology of Learner Agency and the Neoliberal Self.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3 (26): 348–365.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. 2016. “Policy Matters: De/Re/Territorialising Spaces of Learning in Victorian Government Schools.” Journal of Education Policy 1 (31): 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Innovative Learning Environments. Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, T. 2017. Mobile Phones in School: From Disturbing Objects to Infrastructure for Learning. Gothenburg: Kompendiet.
   Google Scholar
• Regjeringen. “ www.regjeringen.no.” 2019. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/53d21ea2bc3a4202b86b83cfe82da93e/core-curriculum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. 1987. “The 1987 Presidential Address Learning in School and Out.” Educational Researcher 9 (16): 13–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L. 1977. “The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1 (10): 173–220.
   Google Scholar
• Royle, K., S. Stager, and J. Traxler. 2014. “Teacher Development with Mobiles: Comparative Critical Factors.” Prospects 44 (29): 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Rychen, D. S., and L. H. Salganik. 2003. “Introduction.” In Key Competencies for a Successful Life and a Well-functioning Society edited by D. S. Rychen and L. H. Salganik, 1–12. Cambridge: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and B. J. Zimmerman. 2007. “Influencing Children’s Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation of Reading and Writing through Modeling.” Reading and Writing Quarterly 1 (23): 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wäschle, K., A. Allgaier, A. Lachner, S. Fink, and M. Nückles. 2014. “Procrastination and Self-Efficacy: Tracing Vicious and Virtuous Circles in Self-Regulated Learning.” Learning and Instruction 1 (29): 103–114.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G., and J. N. Boyd. 2014. “Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual Differences Metric.” In Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application, edited by M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, and W. Beek, 17–55. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar