‘Dirty clothes’: intra-active entanglements in a curriculum of sexual violence

References

• Allen, L. 2015. “The Power of Things! A ‘New’ Ontology of Sexuality at School.” Sexualities 18 (8): 941–958. doi:10.1177/1363460714550920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L., M. L. Rasmussen, and K. Quinlivan. 2014a. The Politics of Pleasure in Sexuality Education. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L., M. L. Rasmussen, K. Quinlivan, C. Aspin, F. Sanjakdar, and A. Bromdel. 2014b. “’Who’s Afraid of Sex at School?’ the Politics of Researching Culture, Religion and Sexuality at School.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 37 (1): 31–43. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.754006.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2014. Encountering Affect: Capacities, Apparatuses, Conditions. Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 8310–8331. doi:10.1086/345321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgardner, J. 2015. “Why Stopslut?” in Slut: A Play and Guidebook for Combating Sexism and Sexual Violence, edited by K. Capiello and M. McInerney., 13–19. New York, NY: Feminist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2004. “The Force of Things: Steps toward an Ecology of Matter.” Political Theory 32 (3): 347–372. doi:10.1177/0090591703260853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M., and M. Zembylas. 2003. “Discomforting Truths: The Emotional Terrain of Understanding Difference.” In Pedagogies of Difference: Rethinking Education for Social Change, edited by P. Trifona, 110–136. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. 2009. “Of Shards, Subjectivities, and the Refusal to ‘Heal’: Reconfiguring the Damage of Incest.” In Theorizing Sexual Violence, edited by R. J. Heberle and V. Grace, 72–95. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. 1992. “Structures of Feeling in Curriculum and Teaching.” Theory into Practice 31 (3): 252–258. doi:10.1080/00405849209543550.
   Google Scholar
• Britzman, D. 1998. Lost Subjects, Contested Objects: Towards a Psychoanalytic Inquiry of Learning. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brockman, J., and M. Wyandt-Heibert. n.d. “What Were You Wearing? Survivor Art Installation Curation Guide.”
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich, A. 2003. An Archive of Feeling . Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, C. 2002. “Cruel: Antonin Artaud and Gilles Deleuze.” In Shock-to-thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari, edited by B. Massumi, 85–100. New York: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Dernikos, B., N. Lesko, S. McCall, and A. Niccolini. 2020. “Feeling Education.” In Mapping the Affective Turn in Education: Theory, Research and Pedagogies, edited by B. Dernikos, N. Lesko, S. McCall, and A. Niccolini, 3–27. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, M. P. 2011. “Safe Space.” In Keywords in Youth Studies, edited by N. Lesko and S. Talburt, 257–262. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forstie, C. 2016. “Trigger Warnings.” In Critical Concepts in Queer Studies and Education, edited by N. Rodriguez, W. Martino, J. Ingrey, and E. Brockenbrough, 421–433. New York: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, R. 2012. “The Illusion of Safety/The Safety of Illusion.” The Rumpus, August. https://therumpus.net/2012/08/28/the-illustion-of-safety
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. 2014. Sexuality in School: The Limits of Education. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J., J. Fields, L. Mamo, and N. Lesko 2018. “LGBTQ Sexuality and Gender beyond Bullying.” The Blog of Harvard Educational Leadership, August 3. http://hepg.org/blog/lgbtq-sexuality-and-gender-beyond-bullying
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J., and S. Khan. 2020. Sexual Citizens: A Landmark Study of Sex, Power and Assault on Campus. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, J. 2020. The Sex Obsession: Perversity and Possibility in America Politics. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, J., and M. Twohey. 2019. She Said: Breaking the Sexual Harassment Story that Helped Ignite a Movement. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, E., C. Milton, and M. Patterson. 2011. Curating Difficult Knowledge: Violent Pasts in Public Places. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardo, Z., and R. Porter. 2010. “Pedagogy of Fear: Toward a Fanonian Theory of ‘Safety’ in Race Dialogue.” Race Ethnicity and Education 13 (2): 139–157. doi:10.1080/13613324.2010.482898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesko, N. 2010. “Feeling Abstinent? Feeling Comprehensive? Touching the Affects of Sexuality Curriculum.” Sex Education 10 (3): 281–297. doi:10.1080/14681811.2010.491633.
   Google Scholar
• Lesko, N., J. Brotman, R. Agarwal, and J. L. Quakenbush. 2010. “Feeling Jumpy: Teaching about HIV/AIDs.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 23 (7): 823–843. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.529472.
   Google Scholar
• Lesko, N., J. Simmons, A. Quarshie, and N. Newton. 2008. “The Pedagogy of Monsters: Scary Disturbances in Doctoral Research Prep Course.” Teachers College Record 110 (8): 1541–1573. doi:10.1177/016146810811000806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, E. 2016. The Minor Gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. 2002. A Shock-to-thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, R., and A. Neary. 2021. “Trans and Gender Diverse Youth Resisting Cisnormativity in School.” Gender and Education 33 (8): 1090–1107. doi:10.1080/09540253.2021.1884201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, L. 2018. “Police Officers’ Perceptions of False Allegations of Rape.” Journal of Gender Studies 2 (1): 9–21. doi:10.1080/09589236.2016.1194260.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, E. 1999. Pedagogical Pleasures. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, K., J. Ringrose, and J. Keller. 2018. “#metoo and the Promise and Pitfalls of Challenging Rape Culture through Digital Feminist Activism.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 25 (2): 236–246. doi:10.1177/1350506818765318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minz, A. 2013. “Helping by Hurting: The Paradox of Suffering in Social Justice Education.” Theory and Research in Education 11 (3): 215–230. doi:10.1177/1477878513498179.
   Google Scholar
• Niccolini, A. 2018. “’The Rape Joke’: Censorship, Affective Activisms and Feeling Subjects.” Journal of Gender Studies 27 (1): 102–113. doi:10.1080/09589236.2016.1202104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niccolini, A., B. Dernikos, N. Lesko, and S. McCall. 2019. “High Passions: Affect and Curriculum Theorizing in the Present.” In Internationalizing Curriculum Studies: Histories, Environments and Critiques, edited by C. Herbert, N. Ng-A-Fook, A. Ibrahim, and B. Smith, 157–175. Cham: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Phipps, A., J. Ringrose, E. Renold, and C. Jackson. 2018. “Rape Culture, Lad Culture and Everyday Sexism: Researching, Conceptualizing and Politicizing New Mediations of Gender and Sexual Violence.” Journal of Gender Studies 27 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1080/09589236.2016.1266792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlivan, K. 2013. “The Methodological Im/possibilities of Researching Sexuality Education in Schools: Working Queer Conundrums.” Sex Education 13 (sup1): S56–S69. doi:10.1080/14681811.2013.796288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renold, E. 2018. “’Feel What I Feel’: Making Da(r)ta with Teen Girls for Creative Activisms on How Sexual Violence Matters.” Journal of Gender Studies 27 (1): 37–55. doi:10.1080/09589236.2017.1296352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., and E. Renold. 2014. “’F**k Rape!’ Exploring Affective Intensities in a Feminist Research Assemblage.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 772–780. doi:10.1177/1077800414530261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, E. 2003. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seigworth, G., and M. Gregg. 2010. “An Inventory of Shimmers.” In The Affect Theory Reader, edited by G. Seigworth and M. Greg, 1–25. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. 2011a. “Afterword: The Turn to Pedagogy: A Needed Conversation on the Practice of Curating Difficult Knowledge.” In Curating Difficult Knowledge: Violent Pasts in Public Spaces, edited by E. Lehrer, C. E. Milton, and M. E. Patterson, 193–209. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. 2011b. “A Shock to Thought: Curatorial Judgment and the Public Exhibition of ‘Difficult Knowledge’.” Memory Studies 4 (4): 432–449. doi:10.1177/1750698011398170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sontag, S. 2003. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs-Richardson, M., N. E. Rader, and A. Cosby. 2018. “Tweeting Rape Culture: Examining Portrayals of Victim Blaming in Discussions of Sexual Assault Cases on Twitter.” Feminism & Psychology 28 (1): 90–108. doi:10.1177/0959353517715874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2013. “Objects, Bodies and Space: Gender and Embodied Practices of Mattering in the Classroom.” Gender and Education 25 (6): 688–703. doi:10.1080/09540253.2013.834864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., and G. Ivinson. 2013. “Material Feminisms: New Directions for Education.” Gender and Education 25 (6): 665–670. doi:10.1080/09540253.2013.834617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagianos, A. 2017. “Art Exhibit Powerfully Answers the Question ‘What Were You Wearing?’” Huffington Post. Accessed 14 March 2022. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/powerful-art-exhibit-powerfully-answers-the-question-what-were-you-wearing_n_59baddd2e4b02da0e1405d2a
   Google Scholar
• “’What Were You Wearing?’ Student Art Installation.” University of Kansas Sexual Assault Prevention and Education Center. Accessed 14 March 2022. https://sapec.ku.edu/what-were-you-wearing
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M., and M. Rasmussen. 2020. “The Affective Matter of (Australian) School Uniforms: The School-dress that Is and Does.” In Mapping the Affective Turn in Education: Theory, Research and Pedagogies, edited by B. Dernikos, N. Lesko, S. McCall, and A. Niccolini, 3–27. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wozolek, B. 2020. “Hidden Curriculum of Violence: Affect, Power and Policing the Body.” Educational Studies 56 (3): 269–285. doi:10.1080/00131946.2020.1745808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. 2014. “Theorizing ‘Difficult Knowledge’ in the Aftermath of the ‘Affective Turn’: Implications for Curriculum and Pedagogy in Handling Traumatic Representations.” Curriculum Inquiry 44 (3): 390–412. doi:10.1111/curi.12051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., and C. McGlynn. 2012. “Discomforting Pedagogies: Emotion, Tension, Ethical Dilemmas and Transformative Possibilities.” British Educational Research Journal 38 (1): 41–59. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.523779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar