Considering technology-based ecological elements in lesbian, gay, and bisexual partnered relationshipsFootnote^*

* Parts of this manuscript were previously presented at the 2016 Bisexual Organizing Project Bisexual Empowerment Annual Conference in Minneapolis, MN, and the 2015 Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality Annual Conference in Albuquerque, NM.

References

• Albright, J. M. (2008). Sex in America online: An exploration of sex, marital status, and sexual identity in Internet sex seeking and its impacts. Journal of Sex Research, 45(2), 175–186. doi:10.1080/00224490801987481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacigalupe, G., & Lambe, S. (2011). Virtualizing intimacy: Information communication technologies and transnational families in therapy. Family Process, 50(1), 12–26. doi:10.111/j.1545-5300.2010.01343.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B. (2012). Determinants of public support for same-sex marriage: Generational cohorts, social contact, and shifting attitudes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(4), 524–533. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belous, C. K., & Bauman, M. L. (2017). What's in a name? Exploring pansexuality online. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(1), 58–72. doi:10.1080/15299716.2016.1224212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belous, C. K., Wampler, R. S., & Warmels-Herring, T. (2015). Gay male adaptation in the coming out process. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 19(1), 55–71. doi:10.1080/19359705.2014.921265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergdall, M. K., & Twist, M. L. C. (2016, April). Being out online: Visibility management in the technology age. Workshop, Bisexual Empowerment Annual Conference: A Uniting Supportive Experience of the Bisexual Organizing Project, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, M. L. C. (2012). Same- s exting p ractices q uestionnaire (Unpublished measure). University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, M. L. C. (2015). Couple and family therapy technology practices: A framework for ethical engagement. Family Therapy Magazine, 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, M. L. C., Bergdall, M., & Ullman, K. (2014, November). E-Visibility management of LGB identities. Poster session presented at the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality Annual Conference, Omaha, NB.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, M. L. C., Haym, C., Zimmerman, K., & Prouty, A. (2014). What's one got to do with it?: Considering monogamous privilege. Family Therapy Magazine, 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, M. L. C., & Hertlein, K. M. (2015). The technology-focused genogram: A tool for exploring intergenerational communication patterns around technology use. In C. J. Bruess (Ed.), Family communication in a digital age (pp. 471–490). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, M. L. C., & VandenBosch, M. L. (2015). Sexual and gender diversity within family therapy. Family Therapy Magazine, 84–87.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, W. R., & Olson-Buchanan, J. B. (2007). The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management, 33(4), 592–610. doi:10.1177/0149206307302552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosnan, M. J. (2002). Technophobia: The psychological impact of information technology. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C., & Krehely, J. (2011). Gay and transgender people face high rates of workplace discrimination and harassment: Data demonstrate need for federal law. Retrieved from https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/lgbt/news/2011/06/02/9872/gay-and-transgender-people-face-high-rates-of-workplace-discrimination-and-harassment/
   Google Scholar
• Chelsey, N. (2005). Blurring boundaries: Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67(5), 1237–1248. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00213.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. (2002). Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeMaria, R., Weeks, G., & Twist, M. L. C. (2017). Focused genograms: Attachment focused intergenerational assessment of individuals, couples, and families (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• D'Augelli, A. R., & Grossman, A. H. (2001). Disclosure of sexual orientation, victimization, and mental health among lesbian, gay, and bisexual older adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1008–1027. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/088626001016010003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fingerhut, H. (2016). Support steady for same-sex marriage and acceptance of homosexuality. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/05/12/support-steady-for-same-sex-marriage-and-acceptance-of-homosexuality/
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. S., Murphy, M. J., & Blumer, M. L. C. (2010). Marriage and family therapists’ comfort working with lesbian and gay clients: The influence of religious practices and support for lesbian and gay human rights. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(10), 1–17. doi:10.1080/00918369.2010.517072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. S., Murphy, M. J., Blumer, M., & Palmanteer, D. (2009). Marriage and family therapists’ comfort level working with gay and lesbian individuals, couples, and families. American Journal of Family Therapy, 37(2), 159–168. doi:10.1080/01926180701441429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grov, C., Breslow, A. S., Newcomb, M. E., Rosenberger, J. G., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2014). Gay and bisexual men's use of the Internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013. Journal of Sex Research, 51(4), 390–409. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.871626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. K., Marett, K., & Harris, R. B. (2011). Technology-related pressure and work-family conflict: Main effects and an examination of moderating variables. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(9), 2077–2103. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00805.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris Poll Interactive. (2010). Gay and lesbian adults are reading and responding to more blogs than heterosexuals. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2010/07/13/study-gay-and-lesbian-adults-are-more-avid-blog-readers-social-network-users/
   Google Scholar
• Harris Poll Interactive. (2017). American Majority Sides with LGBT Rights, Though so-called “Bathroom Bills” Cause Division. Retrieved from http://www.theharrispoll.com/politics/American-Majority-Supports-LGBT-Rights.html
   Google Scholar
• Hart, L. (1994). Fatal women: Lesbian sexuality and the mark of aggression. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haupert, M. L., Gesselman, A. N., Moors, A. C., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2017). Prevalence of experiences with consensual nonmonogamous relationships: Findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(5), 424–440. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henline, B. H., & Harris, S. M. (2006, October). Pros and cons of technology use within close relationships. Poster presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M. (2012). Digital dwelling: Technology in couple and family relationships. Family Relations, 61(3), 374–387. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00702.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Ancheta, K. (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of technology in relationships: Findings from an open-ended survey. The Qualitative Report, 19(22), 1–11. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR19/hertlein22.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. C. (2013). The couple and family technology framework: Intimate relationships in a digital age. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. C. (2015). The couple and family technology framework: Theory and application. In C. J. Bruess (Ed.), Family communication in a digital age (pp. 76–98). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Sendak, S. (2007). Love bytes: Intimacy in computer-mediated relationships. Retrieved from http://www.persons.org.uk/ptb/persons/pil/pil1/hertleinsendak%20paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Stevenson, A. J. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to Internet-related intimacy problems: A literature review. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1), article 1. Retrieved from http://www.cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2010050202
   Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Twist, M. L. C. (2017). Sexting behavior among college students: Implications for college clinicians. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 31(3) 215–230. doi:10.1080/87568225.2016.1277814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertlein, K. M., & Webster, M. (2008). Technology, relationships, and problems: A research synthesis.. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34(4), 445–460. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00087.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymer, S. M., & Rubin, A. M. (1982). Alternative lifestyle clients: Therapists’ attitudes and clinical experiences. Small Group Behavior, 13(4), 532–541. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/104649648201300408?journalCode=sgrb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, S. A. (1999). Internet gambling and pornography: Illustrative examples of psychological consequences of communication anarchy. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 2(3), 175–193. doi:10.1089/109493199316311
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinkler, L. A., & Goldberg, A. E. (2011). Working with what we've got: Perceptions of barriers and supports among same-sex adopting couples in non-metropolitan areas. Family Relations, 60(4), 387–403. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00654.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kort, J. (2009). Depathologizing porn. Psychotherapy Networker, 33, 36–43. Retrieved from http://www.joekort.com/var/joekort/storage/original/application/1640a424c48943cc5cd5e71882771b99.pdf
   Google Scholar
• LaSala, M. C. (2006). Cognitive and environmental interventions for gay males: Addressing stigma and its consequences. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 87(2), 181–189. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.3511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasser, J., & Tharinger, D. (2003). Visibility management in school and beyond: A qualitative study of gay, lesbian, bisexual youth. Journal of Adolescence, 26(2), 233–244. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00132-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmiller, J., Haupert, M., Ryan, W., & Schechinger, H. (2016, November). Dynamics of Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships. Learning Session, Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality Annual Conference, Phoenix, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 38–56. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2137286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, N., & Twist, M. L. C. (2016, November). The rise of digisexuality: Therapeutic challenges and possibilities. Learning Session, Society for Scientific Study of Sexuality Annual Conference, Phoenix, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• McKie, R. M., Lachowsky, N. J., & Milhausen, R. R. (2015). The positive impact of technology on young gay men's dating and sexual relationships in Canada: Results from a focus group study. Journal of LGBT Youth, 12(1), 19–38. doi:10.1080/19361653.2014.935552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, J., & Fassinger, R. (2000). Measuring dimensions of lesbian and gay male experience. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 66–90. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA65196834&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=fulltext&issn=07481756&p=AONE&sw=w&authCount=1&isAnonymousEntry=true
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D. (2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 37(1), 64–80. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00175.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, D. G. (2005). Gay male couples: Challenges and possibilities. Family Therapy Magazine, 6, 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2013). A survey of LGBT Americans: Attitudes, experiences and values in changing times. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2013/06/SDT_LGBT-Americans_06-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1428–1451. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00380.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. J., & Reuben, J. T. (2010). How couples meet and stay together, Wave 2 version 2.04. Machine Readable Data File. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Libraries. Retrieved from http://data.stanford.edu/hcmst
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523–547. doi:10.1177/0003122412448050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. W., & Kauth, M. R. (2002). Men who have sex with men, and the internet: Emerging clinical issues and their management. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians (pp. 47–69). New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shadid, C., Hertlein, K. M., & Steelman, S. (2015). Exploring perceptions of acceptability of sexting in same-sex, bisexual, heterosexual relationships and communities. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 14(4), 342–357. doi:10.1080/15332691.2014.960547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shernoff, M. (2006). Negotiated nonmonogamy and male couples. Family Process, 45(4), 407–418. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2006.00179.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. E., & O'Sullivan, L. F. (2016). I can but you can't: Inconsistencies in judgments of and experiences with infidelity. Journal of Relationships Research, 7. doi:10.1017/jrr.2016.1
   Google Scholar
• Tikkanen, R., & Ross, M. W. (2003). Technological tearoom trade: Characteristics of Swedish men visiting gay internet chat rooms. AIDS Education and Prevention, 15(2), 122–132. doi:10.1521/aeap.15.3.122.23833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twist, M. L. C. (2017). Comment on Infidelity from the Virtual Issues Editor of JMFT. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy Virtual Issue. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1752-0606/homepage/virtual_issue__infidelity.htm
   Google Scholar
• Twist, M. L. C., Belous, C. K., Maier, C. A., & Bergdall, M. K. (2015, November). Technology-Based Ecological Elements in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Partnered Relationships. Poster, Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality Annual Conference, Albuquerque , NM.
   Google Scholar
• Twist, M. L. C., Bergdall, M. K., Belous, C. K., & Maier, C. A. (2017). Electronic visibility management of lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy: Innovations in Clinical Educational Interventions, 16(4), 271–285. doi:10.1080/15332691.2016.1238798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twist, M. L. C., & Hertlein, K. M. (2016). Ethical couple and family e-therapy. In M. J. Murphy & L. Hecker (Eds.), Ethics and professional issues in couple and family therapy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Twist, M. L. C., & Murphy, M. J. (2017). Power in family systems theory. In J. Lebow, A. Cambers, & D. Breunlin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of couple and family therapy. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Twist, M., Murphy, M. J., Green, M. S., & Palmanteer, D. (2006). Therapists’ support of gay and lesbian human rights. Guidance and Counselling, 21(2), 107–113. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/download/22205536/p107_20Twist.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Twist, M. L. C., Prouty, A. M., Haym, C., & VandenBosch, M. L. ( in review). Monogamism measure. In R. Milhausen, J. K. Sakaluk, T. Fisher, C. M. Davis, & W. Yarber (Eds.), The handbook of sexuality-related measures (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, A. (2002). Survey results: Who are we? And other interesting impressions. Loving More Magazine, 30, 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, G. (2006). Therapy with clients who are bisexual and polyamorous. Journal of Bisexuality, 6(1–2), 137–164. doi:10.1300/J159v06n01_08
   Google Scholar