YouTube and limitations of fair use in remix videosFootnote

^§Editors' note: this article presents the outcomes of research conducted prior to summer 2014 and any subsequent changes to legislation.

References

• Arsham, Bryan E. 2013. ‘Monetizing Infringement: A New Legal Regime for Hosts of User-Generated Content.’ Georgetown Law Review 101 (3): 775–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedoms. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Michael. 2007. ‘Fixing Fair Use.’ North Carolina Law Review 85 (4): 1087–1154.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Steve. 2006. ‘“Property Talk” and the Revival of Blackstonian Copyright.’ M/C Journal 9 (4). Accessed February 3 2014. http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0609/5-collins.php
   Google Scholar
• Coombe, Rosemary. 1998. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Commerce, Internet Policy Task Force. 2013. ‘Copyright Policy, Creativity, and Innovation in the Digital Economy.’ Accessed November 23 2013. http://www.uspto.gov/news/publications/copyrightgreenpaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, Nicholas, et al. 2007. ‘The Evolution of Authorship in a Remix Society.’ Paper presented at the HT ‘07 Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Manchester, September 10–12. Accessed November 27 2013. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1286240.1286272
   Google Scholar
• Easterbrook, Frank H. 1990. ‘Intellectual Property is Still Property.’ Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 13: 108–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1965. ‘Towards a Semiotic Enquiry into the Television Message.’ In Communication Studies: An Introductory Reader, edited by John Corner and Jeremy Hawthorn, 131–150. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Kirby. Everything is a Remix. Accessed October 16 2013. http://www.everythingisaremix.info
   Google Scholar
• Goldestein, Paul. 1994. Copyright's Highway: The Law and Lore of Copyright from Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox. New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Stuart. 1980. ‘Encoding/Decoding.’ In Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, edited by Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Love, and Paul Willis, 128–138. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Heins, Marjorie, and Tricia Beckles. 2005. Will Fair Use Survive? Free expression in the age of copyright control. New York: Brennan Center for Justice. Accessed August 7 2013. http://www.fepproject.org/policyreports/WillFairUseSurvive.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Benjamin. 1967. An Unhurried View of Copyright. New York, London: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, David, and Jennifer Lange Anderson. 2001. ‘Copyright, Fair Use and Transformative Critical Appropriation.’ Paper presented at the Conference on the Public Domain, North Carolina, November 9–11. Accessed February 19 2013. http://www.law.duke.edu/pd/papers/langeand.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, John Sheldon. 1989. ‘Copyright Law, Fair Use and the Academy: An Introduction.’ In Fair Use and Free Inquiry, edited by John Sheldon Lawrence and Bernard Timberg, 3–19. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, Lawrence. 2004. Free Culture. New York: The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, Lawrence. 2008. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Leval, Pierre. 1990. Toward a Fair Use Standard. Harvard Law Review 103 (5): 1105–1136. doi:10.2307/1341457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, Kembrew. 2005. Freedom of Expression: Overzealous Copyright Bozos and Other Enemies of Creativity. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney and Auckland: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Joseph. 2010. ‘Fair Use Through the Lenz of §512(c) of the DMCA: A Preemptive Defense to a Premature Remedy?’ Iowa Law Review 95 (5): 1697–1730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, Sue. 2004. ‘Co-creative Media: Online Multiplayer Computer Game Culture.’ Scan Journal of Media Arts Culture 1 (1). Accessed July 6 2013. http://scan.net.au/scan/journal/display.php?journal_id=16
   Google Scholar
• Negativland. 1995. Fair Use: The Story of the Letter U and the Numeral 2. Concord: Seeland.
   Google Scholar
• Netanel, Neil. 1996. Copyright in a Democratic Civil Society. Yale Law Journal, 106: 283–388. doi:10.2307/797212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netanel, Neil. 2008. Copyright's Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patry, William. 1985. The Fair Use Privilege in Copyright Law. Washington DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Patry, William. 2011. How to Fix Copyright. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, Lyman Ray. 2002. ‘The DMCA: A Modern Version of the Licensing Act of 1662.’ Journal of Intellectual Property Law 10 (2): 33–58.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, Lyman Ray and Lindberg, Stanley. 1991. The Nature of Copyright: A Law of Users' Rights. Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer, Finlo. 2010. ‘The Rise, Rise and Rise of the Downfall Hitler Parody.’ BBC News, April 13. Accessed May 17 2013. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8617454.stm
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, Pamela. 2012. ‘The Quest for a Sound Conception of Copyright's Derivative Work Right.’ Georgetown Law Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2138479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidhyanathan, Siva. 2003. Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodmansee, Martha. 1994. ‘On the Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity.’ In The Construction of Authorship, edited by Martha Woodmansee and Peter Jaszi, 15–28. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar