Creative Practice as Research: Discourse on Methodology

References

• Alber, Jan, and Rüdiger Heinze, eds. 2011. Unnatural Narratives - Unnatural Narratology. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Alber, Jan, Stefan Iversen, Henrik Skov Nielsen, and Brian Richardson. 2012. ‘What Is Unnatural about Unnatural Narratology?: A Response to Monika Fludernik.’ Narrative 20 (3): 371–82. doi:10.1353/nar.2012.0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alber, Jan, Stefan Iversen, Henrik Skov Nielson, and Brian Richardson. 2010. ‘Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology: Beyond Mimetic Models.’ Narrative 18 (2): 113–36. doi:10.1353/nar.0.0042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Alice, and Jan Alber. 2012. ‘Ontological Metalepsis and Unnatural Narratology.’ Journal of Narrative Theory 42 (2): 166–92. doi: 10.1353/jnt.2012.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochner, Arthur P. 2000. ‘Criteria Against Ourselves.’ Qualitative Inquiry 6: 266–72. doi:10.1177/107780040000600209.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchardon, Serge, and Davin Heckman. 2012. ‘Digital Manipulability and Digital Literature.’ Electronic Book Review. http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/electropoetics/heuristic.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, D. 1992. ‘The Cognitive as the Social: An Ethnomethodological Approach to Writing Process Research.’ Written Communication 9 (3): 315–55. doi:10.1177/0741088392009003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, Peter. 2009. Narrative-Based Practice. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Andy. 2011. ‘Fiction of Dreams.’ Lecture, December 14.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, Linda. 2006. ‘Practice Based Research: A Guide.’ Sydney: Creativity & Cognition Studios.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Paul. 2004. Material Thinking. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. 1st ed. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, Ernest A, Alastair Weakley, Mark Fell, Roger Knott, and Sandra Pauletto. 2005. ‘The Studio as Laboratory: Combining Creative Practice and Digital Technology.’ International Journal of Human Computer Studies 63 (4–5): 452–81. http://research.it.uts.edu.au/creative/COSTART/pdfFiles/IJHCSSIpaper.pdf. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, Carolyn, Tony E. Adams, and Arthur P. Bochner. 2011. ‘Autoethnography: An Overview.’ Forum Qualitative Social Research 12 (1). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589/3095.
   Google Scholar
• Finke, Ronald A. 1996. ‘Imagery, Creativity, and Emergent Structure.’ Consciousness and Cognition 5 (3): 381–93. doi:10.1006/ccog.1996.0024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, L., and J. R. Hayes. 1984. ‘Images, Plans, and Prose: The Representation of Meaning in Writing.’ Written Communication 1 (1): 120–60. doi:10.1177/0741088384001001006.
   Google Scholar
• Flower, Linda, and John R Hayes. 1981. ‘A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing.’ College Composition and Communication 32 (4): 365–87. doi: 10.2307/356600
   Google Scholar
• Fortune, Ron. 2005. ‘“You’re Not in Kansas Anymore”: Interactions among Semiotic Modes in Multimodal Texts.’ Computers and Composition 22 (1): 49–54. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2004.12.012.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Carole, and Julian Malins. 2004. Visualizing Research: A Guide to the Research Process in Art and Design. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. Katherine. 2002. Writing Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, David. 2007. ‘Storytelling and the Sciences of Mind: Cognitive Narratology, Discursive Psychology, and Narratives in Face-to-Face Interaction.’ Narrative 15 (3): 306–34. doi:10.1353/nar.2007.0023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, Todd. 2009. ‘In Search of the Writer’s Creative Process.’ In The Psychology of Creative Writing, edited by Scott Barry Kaufman and James C. Kaufman, 149–65. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macleod, Katy, and Lin Holdridge, eds. 2006. Thinking Through Art: Reflections on Art as Research. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Makri, S., and Ann Blandford. 2012a. ‘Coming Across Information Serendipitously : Part 1 – A Process Model [Open Access Version].’ Open access version. Journal of Documentation 68 (5): 684–705. doi:10.1108/00220411211256030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makri, S., and Ann Blandford. 2012b. ‘Coming Across Information Serendipitously : Part 2 - A Classification Framework [Open Access Version].’ Journal of Documentation 68 (5): 706–24. doi:10.1108/00220411211256049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, Mark C. 2006. ‘Critical Code Studies.’ Electronic Book Review. http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/electropoetics/codology.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, Shaun. 1998. Art-Based Research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, Shaun. 2013. Arts as Research: Opportunities and Challenges. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Montfort, Nick. 2003. Twisty Little Passages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montfort, Nick. 2011. ‘Toward a Theory of Interactive Fiction.’ In IF Theory Reader, edited by K. Jackson-Mead and J.R. Wheeler, 25–58. Boston, MA: Transcript On Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niedderer, Kristina, and Seymour Roworth-Stokes. 2007. ‘The Role and Use of Creative Practice in Research and Its Contribution to Knowledge.’ In IASDR07: International Association of Societies of Design Research. Hong Kong. http://www.sd.polyu.edu.hk/iasdr/proceeding/papers/THE ROLE AND USE OF CREATIVE PRACTICE IN RESEARCH AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, Gaylene. 2008. ‘The Non-Verbal and the Verbal: Expanding Awareness of Practice-Led Research in Creative Writing.’ In The Creativity and Uncertainty Papers: The Refereed Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the Australian Association of Writing Programs. http://aawp.org.au/files/Perry_2008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pillow, W.S. 2010. ‘Dangerous Reflexivity: Rigour, Responsibility and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.’ In The Routledge Doctoral Student’s Companion, edited by Pat Thomson and Melanie Walker, 270–82. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ranker, Jason. 2008. ‘Composing Across Multiple Media: A Case Study of Digital Video Production in a Fifth Grade Classroom.’ Written Communication 25 (2): 196–234. doi:10.1177/0741088307313021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, Peter, and Hilary Bradbury. 2001. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Brian. 2006. Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Laurel, and Elizabeth Adams St. Pierre. 2008. ‘Writing: A Method of Inquiry.’ In Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 3rd ed., 473–500. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2006. Avatars of Story. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skains, Lyle. 2016a. ‘Creative Commons and Appropriation: Implicit Collaboration in Digital Works.’ Publications 4 (1). http://doi.org/10.3390/publications4010007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skains, Lyle. 2016b. ‘The Fragmented Digital Gaze: The Effects of Multimodal Composition on Narrative Perspective.’ Qualitative Inquiry, Special Issue: Hypermodal Inquiry 22 (3): 183–90. doi:10.1177/1077800415605054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skains, Lyle. 2017. ‘The Adaptive Process of Multimodal Composition: How Developing Tacit Knowledge of Digital Tools Affects Creative Writing.’ Computers and Composition 43: 106–17. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.11.009.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Hazel, and Roger T. Dean. 2009. Practice-Led Research, Research-Led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sondheim, Alan. 2006. ‘My Future Is Your Own Aim.’ Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 12 (4). UNIVERSITY OF LUTON: 375–81. http://sws.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~artistsnewmedialeague/docs/Sondheim_My_Future_is_Your_Own_Aim.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Robyn. 2006. ‘Mindful Practice: Research and Interdisciplinary Dialogues in the Creative Industries.’ In InSEA World Congress: Interdisciplinary Dialogues in Arts Education, 1-5 March 2006, 1–10. Viseu, Portugal: International Society for Education through Art. http://eprints.usq.edu.au/5356/1/Stewart_InSEA_2006_AV.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Graeme. 2009. ‘Making Space: The Purpose and Place of Practice-Led Research.’ In Practice-Led Research, Research-Led Practice in the Creative Arts, edited by Hazel Smith and Roger T. Dean, 41–65. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Graeme. 2010. Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in Visual Arts. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Weight, Jenny. 2006. ‘I, Apparatus, You: A Technosocial Introduction to Creative Practice.’ Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 12 (4): 413–46. doi:10.1177/1354856506068367.
   Google Scholar