Bibliography
- Basedau, M., and P. Köllner. “Area Studies, Comparative Area Studies, and the Study of Politics: Context, Substance, and Methodological Challenges.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 1, no. 1 (2007): 105–124. doi:10.1007/s12286-007-0009-3.
- Collier, D. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44, no. 04 (2011): 823–830. doi:10.1017/S1049096511001429.
- Geddes, B. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics.” Political Analysis 2, no. 1 (1990): 131–150. doi:10.1093/pan/2.1.131.
- George, A. L., and A. Bennett. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs), BCSIA Studies in International Security. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2005.
- Hollis, M., and S. Smith. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991.
- Levin, P. T. Turkey and the European Union: Christian and Secular Images of Islam. 1st ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
- Mitchell, T. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.
- Moses, J. W., and T. L. Knutsen. Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research, 2 [rev. and expanded] ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
- Quataert, D., and S. Sayarı. “Introduction.” In Turkish Studies in the United States, edited by D. Quataert and S. Sayarı, VII–X. Bloomington: Indiana University Ottoman and Modern Turkish Studies Publications, 2003.
- Said, E. W. Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books, 1994.
- Szanton, D. L. “Introduction: The Origin, Nature, and Challenges of Area Studies in the United States.” In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton, ix, 425. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004.