Interdisciplinary Approaches to Political Clientelism and Patronage in Turkey

Bibliography

• Akdağ, Gül. Ethnicity and Elections in Turkey: Party Politics and the Mobilization of the Swing Voters. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Akdağ, Gül. “Ethnicity and Clientelistic Mobilization: The Case of Turkey.” Presented at the Conference on Local Elections and Clientelism in Turkey. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, March 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Catharine. Personal States: Making Connections Between People and Bureaucracy in Turkey. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ark, Ceren. “From Metropolitan Projects to Local Politics: The Local Elections of 2009 and 2014 in an Informal Neighborhood of Istanbul.” Presented at the Conference on Local Elections and Clientelism in Turkey. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, March 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ark, Ceren. “The Old Politics in Support of the New: Creating Mobilization for Local Elections in Turkey.” Paper presented at the Institut Français d'Etudes Anatolliennes, Istanbul, April 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Aytaç, Erdem S. “Distributive Politics in a Multiparty System: The Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Turkey.” Comparative Political Studies, 47, no. 9 (2014): 1211–1237. doi: 10.1177/0010414013495357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, Erdem S., and Ali Çarkoğlu. “Who Gets Targeted for Vote Buying? Evidence from an Augmented List Experiment in Turkey.” Presented at the Conference on Local Elections and Clientelism in Turkey. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, March 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Auyero, Javier. Poor People's Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Barkey, Karen. Bandits and Bureaucrats: The Ottoman Route to State Centralization. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994. 91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, Ulaş S., and Cemal Altan. “Explaining Turkish Party Centralism: Traditions and Trends in the Exclusion of Local Party Offices in Mersin and Beyond.” In Negotiating Political Power in Turkey: Breaking Up the Party, edited by Elise Massicard and Nicole F. Watts, 17–36. London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstadt, S. N., and Rene Lemarchand, eds. Political Clientelism, Patronage and Development. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, Anne. Patronage: An American Tradition. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Gellner, Ernest, and John Waterbury, eds. Patrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies. London: Duckworth, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, Luigi. “Conceptual Framework for the Study of Clientelistic Behavior.” European Journal of Political Research 4, no. 2 (1976): 149–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1976.tb00526.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümüşçü, Şebnem, Işık Gürleyen, and S. Erdem Aytaç. “Clientelism in Contemporary Turkish Politics: Social Goods Distribution Practices of the AKP and CHP Compared.” Presented at the Conference on Local Elections and Clientelism in Turkey. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, March 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Güneş-Ayata, Ayşe. “Participation and Organization in Local Politics: A Comparative Study of Class and Clientage in Two Small Towns.” Doctoral diss., University of Kent, 1984, revised and published in Turkish as CHP: Örgüt ve İdeoloji, Ankara: Gündoğan Yayınları, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Güneş-Ayata, Ayşe. “Roots and Trends of Clientelism in Turkey.” In Democracy, Clientelism, and Civil Society, edited by Luis Roniger and Ayşe Güneş-Ayata, 49–63. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hanioğlu, Şükrü M. A Brief History of the Late Ottoman Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Heper, Metin, and E. Fuat Keyman. “Double-Faced State: Political Patronage and the Consolidation of Democracy.” Middle Eastern Studies 34, no. 4 (1998): 259–277. doi: 10.1080/00263209808701251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgers, Tina. “Clientelism and Conceptual Stretching: Differentiating Among Concepts and Among Analytical Levels.” Theoretical Sociology 40, no. 5 (2011): 567–588. doi: 10.1007/s11186-011-9152-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkin, Jonathan. “Clientelism and Party Politics.” In Party Politics, edited by Richard Katz and William Crotty, 406–412. London: Sage, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hourani, Albert. “Ottoman Reform and Politics of the Notables.” In Beginning of Modernization in the Middle East, edited by William R. Polk and Richard Chambers, 41–68. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• İnalcık, Halil. “The Nature of Traditional Society.” In Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey, edited by Robert E. Ward and Dankwart A. Rustow, 42–63. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. “Turkish Democracy: Patronage versus Governance.” Turkish Studies 2, no. 1 (2001): 54–70. doi: 10.1080/14683849.2001.11009173
   Google Scholar
• Kemahlıoğlu, Özge. Agents or Bosses? Patronage and Intra-Party Politics in Argentina and Turkey. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kemahlıoğlu, Özge, and Reşat Bayer. “Intergovernmental Partisan Ties as Incumbency Advantage: The Use of Central Government Resources.” Presented at the Conference on Local Elections and Clientelism in Turkey. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, March 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kettering, Sharon. “The Historical Development of Political Clientelism.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18, no. 3 (1988): 419–447. doi: 10.2307/203895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert, and Steven J. Wilkinson. “Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies, edited by Herbert Kitschelt and Wikinson, 1–49. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Komşuoğlu, Ayşegül. “Birimiz Hepimiz, Hepimiz Birimiz İçin mi? Dağınık Bir Siyasetin Topluma Sunduğu Elde Kalan Tutkal: Klientalizm.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 116 (2009): 21–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kudat, Ayşe. “Patron–Client Relations: The State of the Art and Research in Eastern Turkey.” In Political Participation in Turkey, edited by Engin Deniz Akarlı and Gabriel Ben-Dor, 61–87. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Lande, Carl J. “Networks and Groups in Southeast Asia: Some Observations on the Group Theory of Politics.” American Political Science Review 67, no. 1 (1973): 103–127. doi: 10.2307/1958529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemerchand, Rene. “Political Clientelism and Ethnicity in Tropical Africa.” American Political Science Review 66, no. 1 (1972): 68–90. doi: 10.2307/1959279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Bernard. The Emergence of Modern Turkey. New York: Oxford University Press, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott P. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Massicard, Elise, and Nicole F. Watts. “Introduction: Reconsidering Parties, Power, and Social Forces.” In Negotiating Political Power in Turkey: Breaking Up the Party, edited by Elise Massicard and Nicole F. Watts, 1–16. London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Meeker, Michael. “The Great Family Aghas of Turkey: A Study of Changing Political Culture.” In Rural Politics and Social Change in the Middle East, edited by R. Antoun and I. Harik, 237–266. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Metin, Onur. “Sosyal Politika Açısından AKP Dönemi: Sosyal Yardım Alanında Yaşananlar.” Çalışma ve Toplum 28, no. 1 (2011): 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Nissani, Moti. “Three Cheers for Interdisciplinarity: The Case for Interdisciplinary Knowledge and Research.” The Social Science Journal 34, no. 2 (1997): 201–216. doi: 10.1016/S0362-3319(97)90051-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun. “Turkey: The Politics of Political Clientelism.” In Political Clientelism, Patronage, and Development, edited by S. N. Eisenstadt and Rene Lemarchand, 249–268. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Özler, İlgü Ş. “Politics of the Gecekondu in Turkey: The Political Choices of Urban Squatters in National Elections.” Turkish Studies 1, no. 2 (2000): 39–58. doi: 10.1080/14683840008721233
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, Simona. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, John Duncan. “Peasant Society and Clientelist Politics.” In Friends, Followers, and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism, edited by Steffen W. Schmidt, Laura Guasti, Carl H. Lande, and James C. Scott, 147–160. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Roniger, Luis. “Political Clientelism, Democracy, and Market Economy.” Comparative Politics 36, no. 3 (2004): 353–375. doi: 10.2307/4150135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancar, Serpil. “Bir Siyasal Model Olarak AKP'nin Havuz Ekonomisi.” Heinrich Böll Stiftung Perspectives Türkiye, no. 9 (2014): 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sayarı, Sabri. “Some Notes on the Beginnings of Mass Political Participation.” In Political Participation in Turkey, edited by Engin Deniz Akarlı and Gabriel Ben-Dor, 121–133. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Sayarı, Sabri. “Political Patronage in Turkey.” In Patrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies, edited by Ernest Gellner and John Waterbury, 103–113. London: Duckworth, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Sayarı, Sabri. “Clientelism and Patronage in Turkish Politics and Society.” In The Post-Modern Abyss and the New Politics of Islam: Assabiyah Revisited—Essays in Honor of Şerif Mardin, edited by Faruk Birtek and Binnaz Toprak, 81–94. Istanbul: Bilgi University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Steffen W., Laura Guasti, Carl H. Lande, and James C. Scott, eds. Friends, Followers, and Factions: A Reader in Political Clientelism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. “Patron–Client Relations and Political Change in Southeast Asia.” American Political Science Review 66, no. 1 (1972): 1142–1158. doi: 10.2307/1959280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüler, Harald. Türkiye'de Sosyal Demokrasi. Particilik, Hemşehrilik, Alevilik. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwood, W. B. “The Rise of the Justice Party in Turkey.” World Politics 20, no. 1 (1967): 54–65. doi: 10.2307/2009727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sönmez, Mustafa. “Istanbul's Income is Earned by a Few Construction Groups during AKP Rule.” Daily News (April 14, 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Susan C. “Vote Buying in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 39, no. 2 (2004): 66–88. doi: 10.1353/lar.2004.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, Susan C. “Political Clientelism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Carter Boix and Susan C. Stokes, 604–627. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Susan C., Thad Dunning, Marcelo Nazareno, and Valeria Brusco. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelim. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sunar, İlkay. “Populism and Patronage: The Demokrat Party and Its Legacy in Turkey.” Il Politico 25, no. 4 (1990): 745–757.
   Google Scholar
• Tachau, Frank. “Turkish Provincial Party Politics.” In Social Change and Politics in Turkey, edited by Kemal Karpat, 283–314. Leiden: Brill, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Tafolar, Mine. “Social Goods Provisioning in a Low-Income Neighborhood: A Tale of Bağcılar.” Presented at the Conference on Local Elections and Clientelism in Turkey. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center, March 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Unbehaun, Horst. Türkiye Kırsalında Klientalizm ve Siyasal Katılım: Datça Örneği: 1923–1992. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Weingrod, Alex. “Patrons, Patronage, and Political Parties.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 10 (1968): 376–400. doi: 10.1017/S0010417500005004
   Google Scholar
• White, Jenny B. Islamist Mobilization in Turkey. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Eric R. “Kinship, Friendship, and Patron–Client Relationships in Complex Societies.” In The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies, ASA Monographs, 4 edited by Michael Banton, 1–22. London: Tavistock, 1966.
   Google Scholar