Shift-of-axis in Turkish Foreign Policy: Turkish National Role Conceptions Before and During AKP Rule

Bibliography

• Abramson, Hillel, Glenn Chafetz, and Suzette Grillot. “Role Theory and Foreign Policy: Belarussian and Ukrainian Compliance with the Nuclear Non-proliferation Regime.” Political Psychology 17, no. 4 (1996): 727–757.
   Google Scholar
• Adigbuo, Richard. “Beyond IR Theories: The Case for National Role Conceptions.” Politikon 34, no. 1 (2007): 83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggestam, Lisbeth. “Role Identity and the Europeanisation of Foreign Policy: A Political Cultural Approach.” In Rethinking European Union Foreign Policy, edited by Ben Tonra and Thomas Christiansen, 81–98. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Altunışık, Meliha. “Worldviews and Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40, Spring (2009): 171–194.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, Bülent, and Aydın Görener. “National Role Conceptions and Foreign Policy Orientation: The Ideational Bases of the Justice and Development Party's Foreign Policy Activism in the Middle East.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 12, no. 1 (2010): 73–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, Bruce J., and Edwin J. Thomas. Role Theory: Concepts and Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Çağaptay, Soner. 2009. “Is Turkey Leaving the West?” Foreign Affairs, October 26. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65661/soner-cagaptay/is-turkey-leaving-the-west
   Google Scholar
• Çandar, Cengiz. 1997. “Post-Modern Darbe.” Sabah, June 28. http://arsiv.sabah.com.tr/1997/06/28/y12.html
   Google Scholar
• Catalinac, Amy L. “Identity Theory and Foreign Policy: Explaining Japan's Responses to the 1991 Gulf War and the 2003 U.S. War in Iraq.” Politics & Policy 35, no. 1 (2007): 58–100.
   Google Scholar
• Cem, Ismail. Turkey in the New Century. Nicosia: Rüstem, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Chafetz, Glenn. “The Struggle for a National Identity in Post-Soviet Russia.” Political Science Quarterly 111, no. 4 (1997): 661–688.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Ariel. “Washington Concerned as Turkey Leaving the West.” Turkish Policy Quarterly 9, no. 3 (2010): 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Steven A. 2010. “How Do You Say ‘Frenemy’ in Turkish?” Foreign Policy, January 25. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/06/01/how_do_you_say_frenemy_in_Turkish
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, Bruce. “The Paradox of Hegemony: America's Ambiguous Relationship with the United Nations.” European Journal of International Relations 7, no. 1 (2001): 103–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Principles of Turkish Foreign Policy and Regional Political Structuring. Ankara: TEPAV, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Davutoğlu, Ahmet. Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye'nin Uluslararası Konumu. İstanbul: Küre, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Davutoğlu, Ahmet. “Turkey's Foreign Policy Vision: An Assessment of 2007.” Insight Turkey 10, no. 1 (2008): 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Policy. 2011. “Top FP Top 100 Global Thinkers.” Foreign Policy, November 28. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/11/28/the_fp_top_100_global_thinkers?page=0,15#thinker16
   Google Scholar
• Ghose, Gauvav, and Patrick James. “Third-party Intervention in Ethno-religious Conflict: Role Theory, Pakistan, and War in Kashmir, 1965.” Terrorism and Political Violence 17 (2005): 427–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, Michael. “Role Theory and Foreign Policy Change: The Transformation of Russian Foreign Policy in the 1990s.” International Politics 42, no. 3 (2005): 334–351.
   Google Scholar
• Güner, Serdar S. “Religion and Preferences: A Decision-theoretic Explanation of Turkey's New Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy Analysis 8, no. 3 (2012): 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnisch, Sebastian. “Change and Continuity in Post-unification German Foreign Policy.” German Politics 10, no. 1 (2001): 35–60.
   Google Scholar
• Hermann, Margaret G. “Role Theory and Foreign Policy Dynamics: The African Arena.” In Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis, edited by Steven Walker, 161–198. Durham: Duke University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, Kalevi J. “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy.” International Studies Quarterly 14, no. 3 (1970): 233–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Gareth. Political Islam in Turkey: Running West, Heading East? New York: Palgrave, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Ryan, and Matt Dickenson. “Turkish Foreign Policy and Public Opinion in the AKP Era.” Foreign Policy Analysis 9, no. 2 (2013): 171–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirişçi, Kemal. “The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40 (2009): 29–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kut, Şule. “The Contours of Turkish Foreign Policy in the 1990s.” In Turkey in World Politics: An Emerging Multiregional Power, edited by Barry Rubin and Kemal Kirişçi, 5–13. Lynn Reiner: Boulder, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Le Prestre, Philippe G., ed. Role Quests in the Post-Cold War Era: Foreign Policies in Transition. Quebec City: McGill Queen's University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Levesque, Jacques, and Jean-Francois Thibault. “The Soviet Union/Russia: Which Past for Which Future.” In Role Quests in the Post-Cold War Era: Foreign Policies in Transition, edited by Philippe G. Le Prestre, 15–39. Quebec City: McGill Queen's University Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Makovsky, Alan O. “The New Activism in Turkish Foreign Policy.” SAIS Review 19, no. 1 (1997): 92–113.
   Google Scholar
• Mutlu, Servet. “The Economic Cost of Civil Conflict in Turkey.” Middle Eastern Studies 47, no. 1 (2011): 63–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oğuzlu, Tarik. “Middle Easternization of Turkey's Foreign Policy: Does Turkey Dissociate from the West?” Turkish Studies 9, no. 1 (2008): 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkan, Behlül. 2014. “Turkey, Davutoglu and the Idea of Pan-Islamism.” Survival 56, no. 4 (2014): 119–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taşpınar, Ömer. 2011. “The Three Strategic Visions of Turkey.” Brookings US-Europe Analysis Series, no. 50, March 8. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/papers/2011/3/08%20turkey%20taspinar/0308_turkey_taspinar
   Google Scholar
• Tezcür, Güneş M., and Alexandru Grigorescu. “Activism in Turkish Foreign Policy: Balancing European and Regional Interests.” International Studies Perspectives 15, no. 3 (2014): 257–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies, Cameron G., and Marijke Breuning. “Integrating Foreign Policy Analysis and International Relations through Role Theory.” Foreign Policy Analysis 8, no. 1 (2012): 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondl, Jarle. “Is There Any Social Constructivist–institutionalist Divide? Unpacking Social Mechanisms Affecting Representational Roles among EU Decision-makers.” Journal of European Public Policy 8, no. 1 (2001): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Tür, Özlem, and Ahmet K. Han. “A Framework for Understanding the Changing Turkish Foreign Policy of the 2000s.” In Turkey in the 21st Century: Quest for a New Foreign Policy, edited by Özden Z. Oktav, 7–31. Burlington: Ashgate, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Stephen G. Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis. Durham: Duke University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. World Development Indicators. Accessed January 5, 2014. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
   Google Scholar
• Yıldız, Ahmet. “Problematizing the Intellectual and Political Vestiges: From ‘Welfare’ to ‘Justice and Development.’” In Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey, edited by Umit Cizre, 41–62. New York: Routledge, 2008.
   Google Scholar