Shot in the foot: unintended political consequences of electoral engineering in the Turkish parliamentary elections in 2018

Bibliography

• Balinski, Michel L., and H. Peyton Young. “Stability, Coalitions and Schisms in Proportional Representation Systems.” American Political Science Review 72, no. 3 (1978): 848–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, and John W. Schiemann. “Institutional Choice in New Democracies: Bargaining Over Hungary’s 1989 Electoral Law.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 13, no. 2 (2001): 153–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esen, Berk, and Şebnem Gümüşçü. “The Perils of ‘Turkish Presidentialism’.” Review of Middle East Studies 52, no. 1 (2018): 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evci, Uğurcan. “Regional Correction of the Flis-Słomczyński-Stolicki Formula: The Case of Turkish Elections.” Decisions (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Flis, Jarosław, Wojciech Słomczyński, and Dariusz Stolicki. “Pot and Ladle: Mathematical Underpinnings.” https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.08291, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Flis, Jarosław, Wojciech Słomczyński, and Dariusz Stolicki. “Pot and Ladle: Seat Allocation and Seat Bias Under the Jefferson-D’Hondt Method.” Public Choice 182, no. 1–2 (2020): 201–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göl, Ayla. “The Paradoxes of ‘New’ Turkey: Islam, Illiberal Democracy and Republicanism.” International Affairs 93, no. 4 (2017): 957–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard, and Thomas L. Brunell. “The Art of the Dummymander: The Impact of Recent Redistrictings on the Partisan Makeup of Southern House Seats.” In Redistricting in the New Millennium, edited by Peter F. Galderisi, 183–199. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard, Evald Mikkel, and Rein Taagepera. “Electoral Systems Change in Estonia, 1989–1993.” Journal of Baltic Studies 30, no. 3 (1999): 227–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, Marek M. “How Communism Could Have Been Saved: Formal Analysis of Electoral Bargaining in Poland in 1989.” Public Choice 98, no. 1–2 (1999): 83–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, Marek M. “Coalitional Stability of Multi-Party Systems: Evidence from Poland.” American Journal of Political Science 45, no. 2 (2001): 294–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, Marek M. “Do Parties Benefit from Electoral Manipulation? Electoral Laws and Heresthetics in Poland, 1989-93.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14, no. 3 (2002): 325–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaminski, Marek M. “Empirical Examples of Voting Paradoxes.” In Handbook of Social Choice and Voting, edited by Jac C. Heckelman, and Nicholas R. Miller, 367–387. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski, Marek M. “Spoiler Effects in Proportional Representation Systems: Evidence from Eight Polish Parliamentary Elections, 1991–2015.” Public Choice 176, no. 3–4 (2018): 441–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, Zeynep N., and Matthew Whiting. “The HDP, the AKP and the Battle for Turkish Democracy.” Ethnopolitics 18, no. 1 (2019): 92–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law Amending Some Provisions of the Law on Basic Provisions on Elections and Voter Registers and some Other Laws, 2018. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/03/20180316-28.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Moraski, Bryon, and Gerhard Loewenberg. “The Effect of Legal Thresholds on the Revival of Former Communist Parties in East-Central Europe.” The Journal of Politics 61, no. 1 (1999): 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Robert G. Unexpected Outcomes: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Representation in Russia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, Jack H. “What Political Scientists Can Learn from the 1993 Electoral Reform in New Zealand.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27, no. 3 (1994): 525–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun. “Democratization in the Middle East: Turkey-How Far from Consolidation?” Journal of Democracy 7, no. 3 (1996): 123–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam. “Błędy: Informacja a Przejście Do Demokracji.” [Mistakes: Information and the Transition to Democracy]. Studia Socjologiczne 145, no. 2 (1997): 51–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sayarı, Sabri. “Politics and Economic Policy-Making in Turkey, 1980–1988.” In Economics and Politics of Turkish Liberalization, edited by Tevfik F. Nas, and Mehmet Odekon, 26–40. London: Associated University Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Shvetsova, Olga. “Endogenous Selection of Institutions and Their Exogenous Effects.” Constitutional Political Economy 14, no. 3 (2003): 191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, Eric. Czecho/Slovakia: Ethnic Conflict, Constitutional Fissure, Negotiated Breakup. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Supreme Election Council [Yüksek Seçim Kurulu]. “YSK Web Portal.” http://www.ysk.gov.tr/. Accessed September 28, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Szymański, Adam, and Jakub Wódka. “Manipulation of Vote Choice–Impediment to the Electoral Integrity in Turkey?” Przegląd Politologiczny 3 (2017): 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Taş, Hakkı. “A History of Turkey’s AKP-Gülen Conflict.” Mediterranean Politics 23, no. 3 (2018): 395–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, Battal. The Presidential System in Turkey: Opportunities and Obstacles. Cham: Springer, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, İhsan, and Galib Bashirov. “The AKP after 15 Years: Emergence of Erdoganism in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly 39, no. 9 (2018): 1812–1830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar