Party system polarization in developing democracies: the case of Turkey, 1950–2018

Bibliography

• Aaskoven, Lasse. “Do Fiscal Rules Reduce Political Polarization?” Comparative European Politics 18, no. 1 (2020): 630–58.
   Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, Alan I. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Samuel Merrill, and Bernard Grofman. A Unified Theory of Party Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, Alberto, and Allen Drazen. “Why Are Stabilizations Delayed?” American Economic Review 81, no. 5 (1991): 1170–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Josephine T., and Jeannette Money. “The Spatial Structure of Party Competition: Party Dispersion Within a Finite Policy Space.” British Journal of Political Science 39, no. 4 (2009): 805–24.
   Google Scholar
• Arslantaş, Düzgün, and Şenol Arslantaş. “Keeping Power Through Opposition: Party System Change in Turkey.” New Perspectives on Turkey 62 (2020): 27–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, Ryan, and Sara B. Hobolt. “Measuring Party Positions.” In Political Choice Matters, edited by Geoffrey Evans, and Nan Dirk de Graaf, 27–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Baumer, Donald C., and Howard J. Gold. Parties, Polarization, and Democracy in the United States. Herndon, VA: Paradigm Publishers, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Boix, Carles. “The Emergence of Parties and Party Systems.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Carles Boix, and Susan C. Stokes, 499–521. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, and Eric Tanenbaum. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Governments, and Electors 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Thomas Meyer. “Understanding and Validating the Left-Right Scale (RILE).” In Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts, edited by Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, Michael D. McDonald, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 85–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, David Robertson, and Derek Hearl. eds. Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, Valerie, and Mária Csanádi. “Uncertainty in the Transition: Post-Communism in Hungary.” East European Politics and Societies 7, no. 2 (1993): 240–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, Ali. “The Nature of Left–Right Ideological Self-Placement in the Turkish Context.” Turkish Studies 8, no. 2 (2007): 253–71.
   Google Scholar
• Cheibub, Jóse Antonio, Jennifer Gandhi, and James Raymond Vreeland. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited.” Public Choice 143, no. 1-2 (2010): 67–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, Michael. “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems.” Party Politics 4, no. 4 (1998): 547–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Gary W. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 34, no. 4 (1990): 903–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curini, Luigi, and Airo Hino. “Missing Links in Party-System Polarization: How Institutions and Voters Matter.” Journal of Politics 74, no. 2 (2012): 460–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. “The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences.” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 7 (2008): 899–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J., David M. Farrell, and Ian McAllister. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J., and Ian McAllister. “Random Walk or Planned Excursion? Continuity and Change in the Left-Right Positions of Political Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 48, no. 6 (2015): 759–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, Jay K. “A Comparative Spatial Analysis of Majoritarian and Proportional Elections.” Electoral Studies 20, no. 1 (2001): 109–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, Jay K. “Party System Extremism in Majoritarian and Proportional Electoral Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 41, no. 2 (2011): 341–61.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Zsolt. “Populist Polarization and Party System Institutionalization: The Role of Party Politics in De-Democratization.” Problems of Post-Communism 63, no. 4 (2016): 210–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmer, Yılmaz. “At the Ballot Box: Determinants of Voting Behavior.” In Politics, Parties, and Elections in Turkey, edited by Sabri Sayarı, and Yılmaz Esmer, 99–103. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Esmer, Yılmaz. “Economic Crisis and Political Polarization: A Challenge to Civic Culture?” Taiwan Journal of Democracy 11, no. 1 (2015): 129–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, Margit Tavits, and Jonathan Homola. “Voter Polarization, Strength of Partisanship, and Support for Extremist Parties.” Comparative Political Studies 47, no. 11 (2014): 1558–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Education, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, Timothy. Building States and Markets After Communism: The Perils of Polarized Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Dieter, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. “The Left-Right Schema.” In Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, edited by M. Kent Jennings, and Jan W. van Deth, 203–34. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael. “Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 10, no. 1 (1991): 33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara, Erica Frantz, and Joseph G. Wright. “Military Rule.” Annual Review of Political Science 17 (2014): 147–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set.” Perspectives on Politics 12, no. 2 (2014): 313–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadenius, Alex, and Jan Teorell. “Pathways from Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 18, no. 1 (2007): 143–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggard, Stephan, and Robert R. Kaufman. “Democratization During the Third Wave.” Annual Review of Political Science 19 (2016): 125–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagopian, Frances. “Parties and Voters in Emerging Democracies.” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Carles Boix, and Susan C. Stokes, 582–603. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Sung Min. “Income Inequality, Electoral Systems and Party Polarization.” European Journal of Political Research 54, no. 3 (2015): 582–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handlin, Samuel. “The Logic of Polarizing Populism: State Crises and Polarization in South America.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 1 (2018): 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig, Timothy, Anna Mikulska, and Burcu Gezgor. “Perceptions of Policy Choice in Contemporary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 49, no. 6 (2010): 705–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, Marc J. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95, no. 3 (2001): 619–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, Marc J. “Putting Polarization in Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 39, no. 2 (2009): 413–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon. “Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses.” European Journal of Political Research 35, no. 1 (1999): 69–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson. “Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?” Comparative Political Studies 35, no. 8 (2002): 965–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, John, and Ronald Inglehart. “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies.” Party Politics 1, no. 1 (1995): 73–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indridason, Indridi H. “Coalition Formation and Polarization.” European Journal of Political Research 50, no. 5 (2011): 689–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, David R. “Party Polarization and Legislative Gridlock.” Political Research Quarterly 54, no. 1 (2001): 125–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycioğlu, Ersin. “Elections and Party Preferences in Turkey: Changes and Continuities in the 1990s.” Comparative Political Studies 27, no. 3 (1994): 402–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpat, Kemal H. Studies on Turkish Politics and Society: Selected Articles and Essays. Boston: Brill, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert. “The Formation of Party Systems in East Central Europe.” Politics & Society 20, no. 1 (1992): 7–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Richard I. Hofferbert, and Ian Budge. Parties, Policies and Democracy. Boulder: Westview Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge, and Michael D. McDonald. Mapping Policy Preferences II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. “‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12, no. 1 (1979): 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat, Romain. “The Impact of Party Polarization on Ideological Voting.” Electoral Studies 27, no. 4 (2008): 687–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laebens, Melis G., and Aykut Öztürk. “Partisanship and Autocratization: Polarization, Power Asymmetry, and Partisan Social Identities in Turkey.” Comparative Political Studies 54, no. 2 (2021): 245–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauka, Alban, Jennifer McCoy, and Rengin B. Firat. “Mass Partisan Polarization: Measuring a Relational Concept.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 1 (2018): 107–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Ian Budge. “Measuring Policy Distances and Modelling Coalition Formation.” In Party Policy and Government Coalitions, edited by Ian Budge, and M. J. Laver, 15–40. London: Palgrave, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and John Garry. “Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 44, no. 3 (2000): 619–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBas, Adrienne. “Can Polarization be Positive? Conflict and Institutional Development in Africa.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 1 (2018): 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, Steven, and María Victoria Murillo. “Variation in Institutional Strength.” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (2009): 115–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, Juan J, and Alfred Stepan. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments, edited by Seymour Martin Lipset, and Stein Rokkan, 1–64. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, Noam. “Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective.” Political Behavior 37, no. 2 (2015): 331–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, Noam, and Rachel Beatty Riedl. “Political Parties and Uncertainty in Developing Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 46, no. 11 (2012): 1339–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainwaring, Scott, and Aníbal Pérez-Linán. “Latin American Democratization Since 1978: Democratic Transitions, Breakdowns, and Erosions.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America, edited by Frances Hagopian, and Scott Mainwaring, 14–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter. “Left-Right Orientations.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Russell J. Dalton, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, 1–20. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, Zeev, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu. “Political Polarization and Cabinet Stability in Multiparty Systems: A Social Networks Analysis of European Parliaments, 1945-98.” British Journal of Political Science 40, no. 4 (2010): 805–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Ryan Bakker. “Crossvalidating Data on Party Positioning on European Integration.” Electoral Studies 26, no. 1 (2007): 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matakos, Konstantinos, Orestis Troumpounis, and Dimitrios Xefteris. “Electoral Rule Disproportionality and Platform Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 60, no. 4 (2016): 1026–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, Jennifer, Tahmina Rahman, and Murat Somer. “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 1 (2018): 16–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, Jennifer, and Murat Somer. “Overcoming Polarization.” Journal of Democracy 32, no. 1 (2021): 6–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, Samuel III, and James Adams. “Centrifugal Incentives in Multi-Candidate Elections.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14, no. 3 (2002): 275–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moral, Mert. “The Passive-Aggressive Voter: The Calculus of Casting an Invalid Vote in European Democracies.” Political Research Quarterly 69, no. 4 (2016): 732–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moral, Mert. “The Bipolar Voter: On the Effects of Actual and Perceived Party Polarization on Voter Turnout in European Multiparty Democracies.” Political Behavior 39, no. 4 (2017): 935–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munck, Gerardo L., and Jeffrey A. Bosworth. “Patterns of Representation and Competition: Parties and Democracy in Post-Pinochet Chile.” Party Politics 4, no. 4 (1998): 471–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, Elizabeth R. After Repression: How Polarization Derails Democratic Transition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, Guillermo. “Illusions About Consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 7, no. 2 (1996): 34–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun. “The Turkish Party System: Institutionalization, Polarization and Fragmentation.” Middle Eastern Studies 17, no. 2 (1981): 228–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun. “Changes and Continuities in the Turkish Party System.” Representation 42, no. 2 (2006): 129–37.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun. Party Politics & Social Cleavages in Turkey. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pardos-Prado, Sergi, and Elias Dinas. “Systemic Polarization and Spatial Voting.” European Journal of Political Research 49, no. 6 (2010): 759–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, Mark. “Party Systems and Democratic Governability.” In Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America, edited by J. Mark Payne, Daniel Zovatto, and Mercedes Mateo Díaz, 149–78. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Poe, Steven C., C. Neal Tate, and Linda Camp Keith. “Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976-1999.” International Studies Quarterly 43, no. 2 (1999): 291–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Bingham G. Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Sani, Giacomo, and Giovanni Sartori. “Polarization, Fragmentation and Competition in Western Democracies.” In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, edited by Hans Daalder, and Peter Mair, 307–40. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni. Parties and Party Systems (Vol.1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Sayarı, Sabri. “The Changing Party System.” In Politics, Parties and Elections in Turkey, edited by Sabri Sayarı, and Yılmaz Esmer, 9–32. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sayarı, Sabri. “Towards a New Turkish Party System?” Turkish Studies 8, no. 2 (2007): 197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. E. Party Government. New York: Reinhart, 1942.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, Philippe C., and Terry Lynn Karl. “What Democracy Is … and Is Not.” Journal of Democracy 2, no. 3 (1991): 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Sigelman, Lee, and Syng Nam Yough. “Left-Right Polarization in National Party Systems: A Cross-National Analysis.” Comparative Political Studies 11, no. 3 (1978): 355–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, Matthew. “Elite Polarization and the Electoral Impact of Left-Right Placements: Evidence from Latin America, 1995-2009.” Latin American Research Review 51, no. 2 (2016): 174–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer, Murat. “Turkey: The Slippery Slope from Reformist to Revolutionary Polarization and Democratic Breakdown.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söyler, Mehtap. The Turkish Deep State: State Consolidation, Civil-Military Relations and Democracy. London: Routledge, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Svolik, Milan W. “Learning to Love Democracy: Electoral Accountability and the Success of Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 57, no. 3 (2013): 685–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, Milan W. “Which Democracies Will Last? Coups, Incumbent Takeovers, and the Dynamic of Democratic Consolidation.” British Journal of Political Science 45, no. 4 (2015): 715–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK). Milletvekili Genel Seçimleri 1923-2011. Ankara: Turkish Statistical Institute Publications, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, Andrea, Tobias Burst, Werner Krause, Pola Lehmann, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, Bernhard Weßels, and Lisa Zehnter. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin Für Sozialforschung (WZB). “Manifesto Project Dataset.” Manifesto Project, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus. “Affective Polarization in Multiparty Systems.” Electoral Studies 69, no. 1 (2021): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Ching-Hsing. “The Effects of Party Fractionalization and Party Polarization on Democracy.” Party Politics 20, no. 5 (2014): 687–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warwick, Paul V. Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wikham, Carie Rosefsky. “The Path to Moderation: Strategy and Learning in the Formation of Egypt’s Wasat Party.” Comparative Politics 36, no. 2 (2004): 205–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 6th ed. New York: Cengage Learning, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. World Development Indicators (WDI). Washington: World Bank, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Zielinski, Jakub. “Translating Social Cleavages Into Party Systems: The Significance of New Democracies.” World Politics 54, no. 2 (2002): 184–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürcher, Erik Jan. Turkey: A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris, 2004.
   Google Scholar