The trajectory of a modified middle power: an attempt to make sense of Turkey’s foreign policy in its centennial

Bibliography

• Altunışık, Meliha Benli. “The Role of Turkey in the Middle East.” Med 2009 Panorama, IEMed, 2009. https://www.iemed.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/The-Role-of-Turkey-in-the-Middle-East.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Altunışık, Meliha Benli. “Worldviews and Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40 (2009): 171–194.
   Google Scholar
• Altunışık, Meliha Benli. “Geopolitical Representation of Turkey’s Cuspness: Discourse and Practice.” In The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations, edited by Marc Herzog and Philip Robins, 25–41. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, Bülent, and Rabia Karakaya Polat. “Turkey and the Middle East: Frontiers of the New Geopolitical Imagination.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 61, no. 4 (2007): 471–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atmaca, Omur, and Zerrin Torun. “Geopolitical Visions in Turkish Foreign Policy.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 24, no. 1 (2022): 114–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlas, Dilek. “Turkish Diplomacy in the Balkans and the Mediterranean. Opportunities and Limits for Middle-Power Activism in the 1930s.” Journal of Contemporary History 40, no. 3 (2005): 441–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bora, Tanıl. Türk Sağının Üç Hali: Milliyetçilik, Muhafazarlık, İslamcılık [Three States of the Turkish Right: Nationalism, Conservatism, Islamism]. 9th ed. İstanbul: Birikim Kitapları, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Steve. “Taiwan as a Cusp State: Contrasting Its People’s Democratic Beliefs With Those of the Chinese and Americans.” In The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations, edited by Marc Herzog and Philip Robins, 168–183. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Criss, Bilge Nur. “Turkey’s Foreign Policies During the Interwar Period (1923–1939).” In Turkish Foreign Policy: International Relations, Legality and Global Reach, edited by Pınar Gözen Ercan, 17–38. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Deringil, Selim. “The Turks and ‘Europe’: The Argument from History.” Middle Eastern Studies 43, no. 5 (2007): 709–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülmez, Seçkin. “Turkish Foreign Policy as Anomaly: Revisionism and Irredentism Through Diplomacy in the 1930s.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 44, no. 1 (2017): 30–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, William. Turkish Foreign Policy Since 1774. 3rd ed. London: Frank Cass, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, Lisel. ““Take It Outside!” National Identity Contestation in the Foreign Policy Arena.” European Journal of International Relations 22, no. 2 (2016): 335–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentleson, Bruce W. “The Middle East Multilateral Arms Control and Regional Security (ACRS) Talks: Progress, Problems, and Prospects.” Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Policy Paper 26, 1996. https://escholarship.org/content/qt97z9g13f/qt97z9g13f_noSplash_cf2acaa2731b42aa415697c47a3a6bfd.pdf?t=krn8yh.
   Google Scholar
• Kutlay, Mustafa, and Ziya Öniş. “Turkish Foreign Policy in a Post-Western Order: Strategic Autonomy or New Forms of Dependence?” International Affairs 97, no. 4 (2021): 1085–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oran, Baskın, ed. Türk Dış Politikası [Turkish Foreign Policy]. Vol. 1, 1919–1980. Ankara: İletişim Publications, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Palabiyik, Mustafa Serdar. “Politicization of Recent Turkish History: (Ab)use of History as a Political Discourse in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 19, no. 2 (2018): 240–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, Philip. “Introduction: ‘Cusp States’ in International Relations -In Praise of Anomalies Against the ‘Milieu’.” In The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations, edited by Marc Herzog and Philip Robins, 1–24. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, Sarah. “Toward a Differentiation-Based Framework for Middle Power Behavior.” International Theory 14, no. 1 (2022): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanık, Lerna. “The Metamorphosis of Metaphors of Vision: “Bridging” Turkey's Location, Role and Identity After the End of the Cold War.” Geopolitics 14, no. 3 (2009): 531–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarakol, Ayşe. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live With the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar