From activism to resilience: the Turkish constitutional court in comparative perspective

Bibliography

• Aliefendioǧlu, Y. Anayasa Yargısı ve Türk Anayasa Mahkemesi. Ankara: Yetkin Basım Yayım ve Daǧıtım AŞ, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Arslan, Z. “Anayasa mahkemesinın ‘yorum tekeli: yargısal üstünlük ve demokrasi.” In Prof Ergun Özbudun'a armağan, cilt 2 anayasa hukuku, edited by S. Yazıcı, K. Gözler, and E. Göztepe, 59–90. Ankara: Yetkin, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, V. “The Role of Turkish Constitutional Court in the Democratization Process of Turkey: From 2002 to Present.” In Constitutionalism in a Plural World, edited by C. S. Botelho, L. H. Terrinha, and P. Coutinho, 139–155. Porto, Portugal: Universidade Católica, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin-Cakir, A. “The Impact of Judicial Preferences and Political Context on Constitutional Court Decisions: Evidence from Turkey.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 16, no. 4 (2019): 1101–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakiner, O. “Judges Discover Politics: Sources of Judges’ Off-Bench Mobilization in Turkey.” Journal of Law and Courts 4, no. 1 (2016): 131–157.
   Google Scholar
• Bâli, AÜ. “Constitutionalism in Turkey.” In The Oxford Handbook of Turkish Politics, edited by G. M. Tezcür, 75–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Belge, C. “Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey.” Law & Society Review 40, no. 3 (2006): 653–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birgün. “Üyeler 367 baskısını birer birer inkâr ediyor,” May 5, 2008, available at https://www.birgun.net/haber/uyeler-367-baskisini-birer-birer-inkar-ediyor-40311.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanger, C. “Europeanization through Judicial Activism? The Hungarian Constitutional Court's Legitimacy and the “Return to Europe”.” In Spreading Democracy and the Rule of Law? The Impact of EU Enlargemente for the Rule of Law, Democracy and Constitutionalism in Post-Communist Legal Orders, edited by W. Sadurski, A. Czarnota, and M. Krygier, 263–280. Dordrecht: Springer, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bugaric, B., and T. Ginsburg. “Courts vs. Autocrats in Post- Communist Europe.” Journal of Democracy 27, no. 3 (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Çalı, B., and B. Durmuş. “Judicial Self-Government as Experimental Constitutional Politics: The Case of Turkey.” German Law Journal 19, no. 7 (2018): 1671–1706.
   Google Scholar
• Calleros, J. C. The Unfinished Transition to Democracy in Latin America. New York: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Can, O. “Anayasayı değiştirme İktidarı ve denetim sorunu.” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 62, no. 3 (2007): 101–139.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. S. The Limits of Judicial Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. S. “Judicial Review.” In The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Judicial Behavior, edited by L. Epstein, and S. A. Lindquist, 271–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• CNNTURK.COM. “367 için askerden baskı gelmedi,” April 5, 2008, available at https://www.cnnturk.com/2008/turkiye/05/04/367.icin.askerden.baski.gelmedi/455529.0/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cumhuriyet. “Tutuklanan AYM üyesi alparslan altan: muhalif oylar nedeniyle hedefim.,” July 25, 2016, available at https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/tutuklanan-aym-uyesi-alparslan-altan-muhalif-oylar-nedeniyle-hedefim-573643.
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, M., and D. W. Jackson. “Horizontal Accountability and the Rule of Law in Central America.” In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, edited by M. Scott, and W. Christopher, 228–265. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Dothan, S. Reputation and Judicial Tactics: A Theory of National and International Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ertekin, O. G. Yargı meselesi hallolundu, Epos yayınları. Ankara: Epos, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, M. J. C. “The Judicialization of Politics in Colombia: The Old and the New.” In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, edited by R. Sieder, L. Schjolden, and A. Angell, 67–103. New York: Palgrave, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Garoupa, N., and T. Ginsburg. Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, T. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, T. “The Constitutional Court and the Judicialization of Korean Politics.” In New Courts in Asia, edited by A. Harding, and P. Nicholson, 145–157. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, T., and T. Moustafa. “Introduction: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes.” In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by T. Ginsburg, and T. Moustafa, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, T., and M. Versteeg. “Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review?” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 30, no. 3 (2013): 587–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gloppen, S., B. M. Wilson, R. Gargarella, E. Skaar, and M. Kinander. Courts and Power in Latin America and Africa. New York: Palgrave, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, T. L. “The Origins (and Fragility) of Judicial Independence.” Vanderbilt Law Review 71 (2018): 465–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazama, Y. “Hegemonic Preservation or Horizontal Accountability: Constitutional Review in Turkey.” International Political Science Review 33, no. 4 (2012): 421–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, G. Courts Under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Heper, M. “Conclusion: The Consolidation of Democracy Versus Democratization in Turkey.” In Political Parties in Turkey, edited by B. Rubin, and M. Heper, 138–146. London: Frank Cass, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschl, R. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Isiksel, T. “Between Text and Context: Turkey's Tradition of Authoritarian Constitutionalism.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 11, no. 3 (2013): 702–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kılıç, B., and S. Açıl. “Adalet bakanı gül: anayasa mahkemesi kararları bağlayıcıdır,” AnadoluAjansi, November 11, 2020, available at https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/politika/adalet-bakani-gul-anayasa-mahkemesi-kararlari-baglayicidir/2039450.
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, K., and K. L. Scheppele. “The Fragility of an Independent Judiciary: Lessons from Hungary and Poland—and the European Union.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 51, no. 3 (2018): 189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkins, C. “The Judiciary and Delegative Democracy in Argentina.” Comparative Politics 30, no. 4 (1998): 423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. “Authoritarianism, Democracy and the Supreme Court: Horizontal Exchange and the Rule of Law in Mexico.” In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, edited by S. Mainwaring, and C. Welna, 266–305. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Moliterno, J. E., and P. Čuroš. “Recent Attacks on Judicial Independence: The Vulgar, the Systemic, and the Insidious.” German Law Journal 22, no. 7 (2021): 1159–1191.
   Google Scholar
• Moral, M., and E. Tokdemir. “Justices ‘en Garde’: Ideological Determinants of the Dissolution of Anti-Establishment Parties.” International Political Science Review 38, no. 3 (2016): 264–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, E., B. F. Crisp, and M. S. Shugart. “The Accountability Deficit in Latin America.” In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, edited by M. Scott, and W. Christopher, 79–131. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, R. M. “Ideational Origins of Progressive Judicial Activism: The Colombian Constitutional Court and the Right to Health.” Latin American Politics and Society 52, no. 3 (2018): 67–97.
   Google Scholar
• Öden, M., and S. Esen. “Fundamental Rights and Freedoms in Turkey and the Turkish Constitutional Court.” In The Convergence of the Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe, edited by R. Arnold, 127–162. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Oder, B. E. “Turkey's Democratic Erosion: On Backsliding and the Constitution.” Social Research 88, no. 2 (2021): 473–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, G. “Afterword.” In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, edited by R. Sieder, L. Schjolden, and A. Angell, 293–298. New York: Palgrave, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Özalp, H. Kuşatılan yargı, Togan Yayınları. İstanbul: Togan Yayıncılık, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. “State Elites and Democratic Political Culture in Turkey.” In Political Culture and Democracy in Developng Countries, edited by L. Daimond, 189–210. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. Türk Anayasa Hukuku [Turkish Constitutional Law]. 3rd rev.ed. Ankara: Yetkin, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. “Türk anayasa mahkemesinin yargısal aktivizmi ve siyasal elitlerin tepkisi.” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 62, no. 3 (2007): 258–268.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. “AKP at the Crossroads: Erdoğan's Majoritarian Drift.” South European Society and Politics 19, no. 2 (2014): 155–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. “Turkey’s Judiciary and the Drift Toward Competitive Authoritarianism.” The International Spectator 50, no. 2 (2015): 42–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özçelik, C. Hüküm giyen adalet, Destek yayınları. İstanbul: Destek, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rios-Figueroa, J. “Instiuttions for Constitutional Justice in Latin America.” In Courts in Latin America, edited by G. Helmke, and J. Rios-Figueroa, 27–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Saatçioğlu, B. “De-Europeanisation in Turkey: The Case of the Rule of Law.” South European Society and Politics 21, no. 1 (2016): 133–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadurski, W. Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. “Constitutional Negotiations.” International Sociology 18, no. 1 (2003): 219–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. “Guardians of the Constitution: Constitutional Court Presidents and the Struggle for the Rule of Law in Post-Soviet Europe.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154, no. 6 (2006): 1757–1851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. “Surprising Success: The New Eastern European Constitutional Courts.” In The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies, edited by A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M. Plattner, 79–131. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Seven, G., and L. Vinx. “The Hegemonic Preservation Thesis Revisited: The Example of Turkey.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 9 (2017): 45–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shambayati, H., and E. Kirdiş. “In Pursuit of “Contemporary Civilization”: Judicial Empowerment in Turkey.” Political Research Quarterly 62, no. 4 (2009): 767–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smekal, H., J. Benák, and L. Vyhnánek. “Through Selective Activism Towards Greater Resilience: The Czech Constitutional Court's Interventions into High Politics in the Age of Populism,”.” The International Journal of Human Rights 26, no. 7 (2022): 1230–1251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sólyom, L. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Transition to Democracy.” International Sociology 18, no. 1 (2003): 133–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockholm Center for Freedom. “Turkey’s Judicial Council: Guarantor or Annihilator of Judicial Independence,”March 4, 2021, available at https://stockholmcf.org/turkeys-judicial-council-guarantor-or-annihilator-of-judicial-independence/.
   Google Scholar
• Taş, H. “A History of Turkey’s AKP-Gülen Conflict.” Mediterranean Politics 23, no. 3 (2018): 395–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekin, Y. “Yargı vesayeti ve HSYK seçimleri.” http://www.yusuftekin.net/?p=345.
   Google Scholar
• Varol, O. O., L. Dalla Pellegrina, and N. Garoupa. “An Empirical Analysis of Judicial Transformation in Turkey.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 65, no. 1 (2017): 187–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. M. “Changing Dinamics: The Political Impact of Costa Rica's Constitutional Court.” In The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, edited by R. Sieder, L. Schjolden, and A. Angell, 47–65. New York: Palgrave, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Yayın, C. “Anayasa mahkemesi'nden 367 atağı,” October 4, 2007, available at https://www.haberturk.com/gundem/haber/19819-anayasa-mahkemesinden-367-atagi.
   Google Scholar
• Yazıcı, S. Yenı bir anayasa hazırlığı ve Türkiye: seçkinlikten toplum sözleşmesine. Istanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi, 2009.
   Google Scholar