Reflections on Şerif Mardin’s center-periphery thesis

Bibliography

• Arat, Yeşim. “Toward a Democratic Society: The Women’s Movement in Turkey in the 1980s.” Women's Studies International Forum 17, no. 2–3 (1994): 241–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın-Düzgit, Senem, and Evren Balta. “When Elites Polarize Over Polarization: Framing the Polarization Debate in Turkey.” New Perspectives on Turkey 60 (2019): 153–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakiner, Onur. “A Key to Turkish Politics? the Center–Periphery Framework Revisited.” Turkish Studies 19, no. 4 (2018): 503–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, Pınar. The International in Security, Security in the International. London: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, Ali. “The Rise of the New Generation Pro-Islamists in Turkey: The Justice and Development Party Phenomenon in the November 2002 Elections in Turkey.” South European Society and Politics 7, no. 3 (2002): 123–156.
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, Ali. “The Nature of Left–Right Ideological Self-Placement in the Turkish Context.” Turkish Studies 8, no. 2 (2007): 253–271.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, Ayşe B., Rezarta Bilali, and Yeshim Iqbal. “Patterns of ‘Othering’ in Turkey: A Study of Ethnic, Ideological and Sectarian Polarisation.” South European Society and Politics 22, no. 2 (2017): 217–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciddi, Sinan. Kemalism in Turkish Politics: The Republican People’s Party, Secularism and Nationalism. London: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ciddi, Sinan. “Turkey’s September 12, 2010: Referendum.” MERIA Journal 15, no. 4 (2011): 19–31. https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/journals/meria/v15i4/f_0029699_24018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Duignan, Brian. “Occam’s Razor.” Encyclopedia Britannica, December 1, 2022, available at https://www.britannica.com/topic/Occams-razor.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Robert. “The Principle of Parsimony and Some Applications in Psychology.” The Journal of Mind and Behavior 5, no. 2 (1984): 119–130.
   Google Scholar
• German Marshall Fund. “Dimensions of Polarization in Turkey 2020.” (2020), available at https://www.turkuazlab.org/en/dimensions-of-polarization-in-turkey-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Gingeras, Ryan. “Last Rites for a ‘Pure Bandit’: Clandestine Service,: Historiography and the Origins of the Turkish ‘Deep State’.” Past & Present 206, no. 1 (2010): 151–174.
   Google Scholar
• Gingeras, Ryan. “In the Hunt for the ‘Sultans of Smack’; Dope,: Gangsters and the Construction of the Turkish Deep State.” The Middle East Journal 65, no. 3 (2011): 426–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gözaydın, İştar. Diyanet: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti’nde dinin tanzimi. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoriadis, Ioannis.N. “Islam and Democratization in Turkey: Secularism and Trust in a Divided Society.” Democratization 16, no. 6 (2009): 1194–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülalp, Haldun. “Globalization and Political Islam: The Social Bases of Turkey's Welfare Party.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 33, no. 3 (2001): 433–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülalp, Haldun. Kimlikler Siyaseti. Istanbul: Metis Yayınları, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Güngen, Ali Rıza, and Şafak Erten. “Approaches of Şerif Mardin and Metin Heper on State and Civil Society in Turkey.” Journal of Historical Studies 3 (2005): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, Michael M. “Turkey, Kemalism, and the ‘Deep State’.” In Conflict, Democratization, and the Kurds in the Middle East: Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria, edited by David Romano, and Mehmet Gurses, 17–39. New York: Palgrave, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gürhanli, Halil. Beyond Populism: From Scholarship to Politics in ‘New’ Turkey. PhD diss., University of Helsinki, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, William. Turkish Politics and the Military. London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Heper, Metin. “The Executive in the Third Turkish Republic, 1982–1989.” Governance 3, no. 3 (1990): 299–319.
   Google Scholar
• Heper, Metin. The State and Kurds in Turkey: The Question of Assimilation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks. “Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset,: Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage.” Journal of European Public Policy 25, no. 1 (2018): 109–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs 72, no. 3 (1993): 22–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inalcık, Halil. “The Nature of Traditional Society: Turkey.” In Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey, edited by Robert E. Ward, and Dankwart A. Rustow, 42–63. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Kadioğlu, Ayşe. “The Paradox of Turkish Nationalism and the Construction of Official Identity.” Middle Eastern Studies 32, no. 2 (1996): 177–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycioğlu, Ersin. “Turkish Democracy: Patronage Versus Governance.” Turkish Studies 2, no. 1 (2001): 54–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycioğlu, Ersin. Turkish Dynamics: Bridge Across Troubled Lands. New York: Palgrave, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. “Elections and Party Preferences in Turkey: Changes and Continuities in the 1990s.” Comparative Political Studies 27, no. 3 (1994): 402–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaliber, Alper. “Securing the Ground Through Securitized ‘Foreign’ Policy: The Cyprus Case.” Security Dialogue 36, no. 3 (2005): 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, Andrea. Liberal Intellectuals and Human Rights in the Turkish Public Sphere: Contestation and Pragmatism from the 1990s to the AKP-era. PhD Diss, Lund University, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kasaba, Reşat. A Moveable Empire: Ottoman Nomads, Migrants, and Refugees. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, Ayhan. Europeanization and Tolerance in Turkey: The Myth of Toleration. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, Imre. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Volume 1: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, edited by S. M. Lipset, 3–64. New York: Free Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Mardin, Şerif. “Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics?” Daedalus 102, no. 1 (1973): 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Mardin, Şerif. The Genesis of Young Ottoman Thought: A Study in the Modernization of Turkish Political Ideas. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Ziya. “The Triumph of Conservative Globalism: The Political Economy of the AKP Era.” Turkish Studies 13, no. 2 (2012): 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Ziya, and Şuhnaz Yilmaz. “Between Europeanization and Euro-Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey during the AKP Era.” Turkish Studies 10, no. 1 (2009): 7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun. “Changes and Continuities in the Turkish Party System.” Representation 42, no. 2 (2006): 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun. “From Political Islam to Conservative Democracy: The Case of the Justice and Development Party in Turkey.” South European Society and Politics 11, no. 3–4 (2006): 543–557.
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun. “Turkey's Constitutional Reform and the 2010 Constitutional Referendum.” In Mediterranean Yearbook 2011, 191–194. Barcelona: IEMed, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sayarı, Sabri. “The Turkish Party System in Transition.” Government and Opposition 13, no. 1 (1978): 39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shils, Edward. “Centre and Periphery.” In The Logic of Personal Knowledge: Essays Presented to Michael Polanyi, edited by Polanyi Festschrift Committee, 117–130. London: Kegan Paul, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Somer, Murat. “Moderation of Religious and Secular Politics, a Country’s ‘Centre’ and Democratization.” Democratization 21, no. 2 (2014): 244–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer, Murat. “Turkey: The Slippery Slope from Reformist to Revolutionary Polarization and Democratic Breakdown.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söyler, Mehtap. “Informal Institutions, Forms of State and Democracy: The Turkish Deep State.” Democratization 20, no. 2 (2013): 310–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, Dorothy. “Occam’s Razor: A Principle of Intellectual Elegance.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16, no. 3 (1979): 241–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watmough, Simon Paul. Democracy in the Shadow of the Deep State: Guardian Hybrid Regimes in Turkey and Thailand. PhD diss., Florence: European University Institute, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wuthrich, F.: Michael. “An Essential Center-Periphery Electoral Cleavage and the Turkish Party System.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 45, no. 4 (2013): 751–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, M. Hakan. “Political Islam and the Welfare (Refah) Party in Turkey.” Comparative Politics 30, no. 1 (1997): 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürcher, Erik J. Turkey: A Modern History. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.
   Google Scholar