Debating voter defection in Turkey

Bibliography

• Acemoğlu, Daron, and Murat Üçer. “The Ups and Downs of Turkish Growth, 2002–2015: Political Dynamics, the European Union and the Institutional Slide.” NBER Working Paper No: 21608, Cambridge MA, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J. “Economic Voting and Political Context: A Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies 19, no. 2-3 (2000): 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, Erdem. “Economic Voting During the AKP Era in Turkey.” In The Oxford Handbook of Turkish Politics, edited by Güneş Murat Tezcür, 319–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Aytaç, Erdem. “The Economic Vote in the 2018 Turkish General Election.” In Elections and Public Opinion in Turkey: Through the Prism of the 2018 Elections, edited by Ali Çarkoğlu, and Ersin Kalaycıoğlu, 122–132. London: Routledge, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S. Erdem, Ali Çarkoğlu, and Ezgi Elçi. “Partisanship, Elite Messages, and Support for Populism in Power.” European Political Science Review 13, no. 1 (2021): 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S. Erdem, and Ezgi Elçi. “Populism in Turkey.” In Populism Around the World, 89–108. Cham: Springer, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Balaban, Utku. “The Islamist-Secularist Coalition and Social Class in Turkey.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 88, no. 2 (2021): 271–297.
   Google Scholar
• Bashirov, Galib, and Caroline Lancaster. “End of Moderation: The Radicalization of AKP in Turkey of Moderation: The Radicalization of AKP in Turkey.” Democratization 25, no. 7 (2018): 1210–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başlevent, Cem, and Hasan Kirmanoğlu. “Economic Voting in Turkey: Perceptions, Expectations, and the Party Choice.” Research and Policy on Turkey 1, no. 1 (2016): 88–101.
   Google Scholar
• Başlevent, Cem, Hasan Kirmanoğlu, and Burhan Şenatalar. “Empirical Investigation of Party Preferences and Economic Voting in Turkey.” European Journal of Political Research 44, no. 4 (2005): 547–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Paul A. “Encouraging Political Defection: The Role of Personal Discussion Networks in Partisan Desertions to the Opposition Party and Perot Votes in 1992.” Political Behavior 24, no. 4 (2002): 309–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianet. “Millet İttifakı Tutum Belgesini Açıkladı,” June 21, 2021. https://m.bianet.org/bianet/siyaset/198415-millet-ittifaki-tutum-belgesi-ni-acikladi.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Richard W. “Presidential Elections: An Explanation of Voting Defection.” American Political Science Review 63, no. 2 (1969): 498–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buğra, Ayşe. “Class, Culture, and State: An Analysis of Interest Representation by Two Turkish Business Associations.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 30 (1998): 521–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakır, Semih. “Polarized Partisanship, Over-Stability and Partisan Bias in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 21, no. 4 (2020): 497–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakmaklı, Cem, Selva Demiralp, Şebnem Kalemli Özcan, Sevcan Yeşiltaş, and Muhammed Ali Yıldırım. “COVID-19 and Emerging Markets: The Case of Turkey.” Economic Research Forum Working Paper no: 2011, April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, Koray. “Toward a new Political Regime in Turkey: From Competitive Toward Full Authoritarianism.” New Perspectives on Turkey 58 (2018): 5–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, Ali. “Ideology or Economic Pragmatism? Profiling Turkish Voters in 2007.” Turkish Studies 9, no. 2 (2008): 317–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, Ali, and S. Erdem Aytaç. “Haziran 2015 Seçimlerine giderken kamuoyu Dinamikleri.” [“Public Opinion Dynamics Ahead of the June 2015 Elections in Turkey.”] Koç University Center for Survey Research. May 5, 2015. http://home.ku.edu.tr/~saytac/uploads/4/4/6/3/44632775/Haziran2015sunum.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, Ali, and Ersin Kalaycıoğlu. Elections and Public Opinion in Turkey: Through the Prism of the 2018 Elections. London: Routledge, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, Ayşe B., and Evren Balta. “Explaining the Micro Dynamics of the Populist Cleavage in the ‘New Turkey.” Mediterranean Politics 25, no. 2 (2020): 160–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çınar, Menderes. “The Electoral Success of the AKP: Cause for Hope and Despair.” Insight Turkey 13, no. 4 (2011): 107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Çınar, Kürşat. “Local Determinants of an Emerging Electoral Hegemony: The Case of Justice and Development Party (AKP) in Turkey.” Democratization 23, no. 7 (2016): 1216–1235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiralp, Seda. “The Rise of Islamic Capital and the Decline of Islamic Radicalism in Turkey.” Comparative Politics 41, no. 3 (2009): 315–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiralp, Seda. “Making Winners: Urban Transformation and Neoliberal Populism in Turkey Winners: Urban Transformation and Neoliberal Populism in Turkey.” The Middle East Journal East Journal 72, no. 1 (2018): 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiralp, Seda, and Evren Balta. “Defeating Populists: The Case of 2019 Istanbul Elections.” South European Society and Politics 26, no. 1 (2021): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiralp, Seda, and Selva Demiralp. “The Erosion of Central Bank Independence in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 20, no. 1 (2019): 9–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiralp, Seda, Selva Demiralp, and İnci Gümüş. “The State of Property Development in Turkey: Facts and Comparisons.” New Perspectives on Turkey 55 (2016): 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Eder, Mine. “Deepening Neoliberalisation and Changing Welfare Regime in Turkey: Mutations of a Populist, ‘Sub-Optimal’ Democracy?” In Turkey’s Democratization Process, edited by Antonio Avalos, Carmen Rodríguez, Ana I. Planet, and Hakan Yilmaz, 195–220. London: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Esen, Berk, and Sebnem Gumuscu. “Killing Competitive Authoritarianism Softly: The 2019 Local Elections in Turkey.” South European Society and Politics 24, no. 3 (2019): 317–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulau, Heinz, and Michael S. Lewis-Beck. Economic Conditions and Electoral Outcomes in the United States and Western Europe. New York: Agathon, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Forgette, Richard, and Glenn J. Platt. “Voting for the Person, not the Party: Party Defection, Issue Voting, and Process Sophistication.” Social Science Quarterly 80, no. 2 (1999): 409–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Ekrem Karakoç. “Which Matters More in the Electoral Success of Islamist (Successor) Parties—Religion or Performance? The Turkish Case.” Party Politics 22, no. 3 (2016): 325–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümüşçü, Şebnem, and Deniz Sert. “The March 2009 Local Elections and the Inconsistent Democratic Transformation of the AKP Party in Turkey March 2009 Local Elections and the Inconsistent Democratic Transformation of the AKP Party in Turkey.” Middle East Critique East Critique 19, no. 1 (2010): 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Henry E., and Timothy J. Colton. “Who Defects? Unpacking a Defection Cascade from Russia’s Dominant Party 2008–12.” American Political Science Review 111, no. 2 (2017): 322–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Scott. “Not Swinging Together: Partisan Defection in the age of Political Polarization Swinging Together: Partisan Defection in the age of Political Polarization.” The Social Science Journal Social Science Journal (2020) online. doi:10.1080/03623319.2020.1735856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, Jerry, Andrew Lo, and Craig Mackinley. “An Ordered Probit Analysis of Transaction Stock Prices.” Journal of Financial Economics 31, no. 3 (1992): 319–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hürriyet. “Erdoğan: AKP muhafazakar Eksenli çağdaş bir Partidir,” October 12, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. “Justice and Development Party at the Helm: Resurgence of Islam or Restitution of the Right-of-Center Predominant Party?” Turkish Studies 11, no. 1 (2010): 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, Ersin. “Kulturkampf in Turkey: The Constitutional Referendum of 12 September 2010.” South European Society and Politics 17, no. 1 (2012): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Woo Chang. “Presidential Pork Barrel Politics with Polarized Voters.” Political Geography 67 (2018): 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaman, Ozan. “Urban Neoliberalism with Islamic Characteristics.” Urban Studies 50, no. 16 (2013): 3412–3427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kılıç, Şehriban. “Türkiye Nüfusunun Yaklaşık %32’si Yardımlarla Ayakta Durabiliyor,” Cumhuriyet, March 21, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, Tuna, and Özlem Ünsal. “‘Urban Transformation’ as State-Led Property Transfer: An Analysis of Two Cases of Urban Renewal in Istanbul.” Urban Studies 47, no. 7 (2010): 1479–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laebens, Melis G, and Aykut Öztürk. “Partisanship and Autocratization: Polarization, Power Asymmetry, and Partisan Social Identities in Turkey.” Comparative Political Studies 54, no. 2 (2021): 245–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, Michael S. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Mardin, Şerif. “Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics.” Daedalus 102, no. 1 (1973): 169–190.
   Google Scholar
• Marschall, Melissa, Abdullah Aydogan, and Alper Bulut. “Does Housing Create Votes? Explaining the Electoral Success of the AKP in Turkey Housing Create Votes? Explaining the Electoral Success of the AKP in Turkey.” Electoral Studies Studies 42 (2016): 201–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, Sabrina Jasmin. “How Negative Partisanship Affects Voting Behavior in Europe: Evidence from an Analysis of 17 European Multi-Party Systems with Proportional Voting Negative Partisanship Affects Voting Behavior in Europe: Evidence from an Analysis of 17 European Multi-party systems with Proportional Voting.” Research & Politics & Politics 4, no. 1 (2017), published online, doi:10.1177/2053168016686636
   Google Scholar
• Mounk, Yascha. “The Undemocratic Dilemma.” Journal of Democracy 29, no. 2 (2018): 98–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummolo, Jonathan, Erik Peterson, and Sean Westwood. “The Limits of Partisan Loyalty.” Political Behavior 43, no. 3 (2021): 949–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Ziya. “The Political Economy of Turkey’s Justice and Development Party.” In The Emergence of a New Turkey, edited by Hakan Yavuz, 207–234. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Ziya. “The Triumph of Conservative Globalism: The Political Economy of the AKP era.” Turkish Studies 13, no. 2 (2012): 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbudun, Ergun. “AKP at the Crossroads: Erdoğan’s Majoritarian Drift.” South European Society and Politics 19, no. 2 (2014): 155–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özen, Hayriye. “An Unfinished Grassroots Populism: The Gezi Park Protests in Turkey and Their Aftermath.” South European Society and Politics 20, no. 4 (2015): 533–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paldam, Martin. “How Robust is the Vote Function?” In Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, edited by Helmut Norpoth, Jean-Dominique Lafay, and Michael S. Lewis-Beck, 9–31. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Pamuk, Şevket. Türkiye’nin 200 Yıllık İktisadi Tarihi. Istanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham, and Guy D. Whitten. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37, no. 2 (1993): 391–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Zachary A., and Jared McDonald. “Tell Us How You Feel: Emotional Appeals for Votes in Presidential Primaries.” American Politics Research 50, no. 5 (2022): 609–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selçuk, Orçun, and Dilara Hekimci. “The Rise of the Democracy – Authoritarianism Cleavage and Opposition Coordination in Turkey (2014–2019).” Democratization 27, no. 8 (2020): 1496–1514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sides, John, Chris Tausanovitch, and Lynn Vavreck. The Bitter End: The 2020 Presidential Campaign and the Challenge to American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Smidt, Corwin D. “Polarization and the Decline of the American Floating Voter.” American Journal of Political Science 61, no. 2 (2017): 365–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer, Murat. “Turkey: The Slippery Slope from Reformist to Revolutionary Polarization and Democratic Breakdown.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sözen, Yunus. “Competition in a Populist Authoritarian Regime: The June 2018 Dual Elections in Turkey.” South European Society and Politics 24, no. 3 (2019): 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toros, Emre. “Social Indicators and Voting: The Turkish Case.” Social Indicators Research 115, no. 3 (2014): 1011–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroek, L. Matthew. “Lost Our Lease.” American Politics Research 39, no. 6 (2011): 1045–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Till. “Negative Voting and Party Polarization: A Classic Tragedy.” Electoral Studies 71 (2021), published online doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardımcı-Geyikci, Sebnem. “Gezi Park Protests in Turkey: A Party Politics View.” The Political Quarterly 85, no. 4 (2014): 445–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar