The ‘civil society policy’ of the European Union for promoting democracy in Turkey: golden goose or dead duck?

References

• Alemdar, Z. 2008. Turkish civil society and the European Union. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Almond, G., and S. Verba. 1963. The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arabacı, A. 2008. “Explaining transformation of Turkish civil society in the EU accession process.” Insight Turkey 10(4): 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. 1999. “Clansmen, consumers, and citizens: Three takes on civil society.” In Civil society, democracy, and civic renewal, edited by R.K. Fullinwider, 9–30. Lanham, MD: Rowman& Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Chandoke, N. 1995. State and civil society: Explorations in political theory. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 1994. “Rethinking civil society: Toward democratic consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 5: 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 2008. The spirit of democracy: The struggle to build free societies throughout the world. New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A., and G. Pridham. 2004. “International actors and democracy promotion in central and Eastern Europe: The integration model and its limits.” Democratization 11(5): 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. 2004. Civil society. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekiert, G., J. Kubik, and M.A. Vachudova. 2007. “Democracy in the post-communist world: An unending quest?” East European Politics and Societies 21(1): 7–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergun, A. 2010. “Civil society in Turkey and local dimensions of Europeanization.” Journal of European Integration 32: 507–522.
   Google Scholar
• Göksel, D.N., and R. Birden Güneş. 2005. “The role of NGOs in the European integration process: The Turkish experience.” South European Society & Politics 10: 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Grabbe, H. 2001. “How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity.” Journal of European Public Policy 8(6): 1013–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J., and J. Pearce. 2001. Civil society and development: A critical explanation. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• İçduygu, A. 2011. “Revisiting civil society in Turkey.” South European Society and Politics 16(3): 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İçduygu, A., Z. Meydanoğlu, and D. Sert. 2011. Civil society in Turkey: At a turning point CIVICUS Civil Society Index (CSI) project country report for Turkey II. Istanbul: TUSEV Publications No: 51.
   Google Scholar
• Keyman, F.E., and A. İçduygu. 2003. “Globalization, civil society and citizenship in Turkey: Actors, boundaries and discourses.” Citizenship Studies 7: 219–234.
   Google Scholar
• Kubicek, P. 2011. “Political conditionality and European Union’s cultivation of democracy in Turkey.” Democratization 18(4): 910–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottoway, M., and T. Carothers. 2000. Civil society aid and democracy promotion. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Pridham, G. 2005. Designing democracy EU enlargement and regime change in post-communist Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pridham, G. 2006. “European Union accession dynamics and democratization in Central and Eastern Europe: Past and future perspectives.” Government and Opposition 41(3): 373–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. 1995. “Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital.” Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelili, B. 2005. “Civil society and the Europeanization of Greek–Turkish cooperation.” South European Society and Politics 10: 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., S. Engert, and H. Knobel. 2003. “Costs, commitment and compliance: The impact of EU democratic conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey.” Journal of Common Market Studies 41(3): 495–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., and U. Sedelmeier. 2004. “Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 11(4): 661–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soysal, E. 2010. The impact of TUSIAD on the European Union relations of Turkey: (1995–2005). Lambert Academic Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 1996. “Making social science work across space and time: A critical reflection on Robert Putnam’s making democracy work.” American Political Science Review 90: 389–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. 2005. “Europeanization in Turkey: Trigger or anchor for reform?” South European Society and Politics 10(1): 73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Tocqueville, A.D. 1966. Democracy in America. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Toros, E. 2007. “Understanding the role of civil society as an agent for democratic consolidation: The Turkish case.” Turkish Studies 8(3): 395–416.
   Google Scholar
• Vorhoff, K. 2000. “Businessmen and their organizations: Between industrial solidarity, cultural diversity, and the state.” In Civil society in the grip of nationalism, edited by S. Yerasimos, G. Seufert and K. Vorhoff, 105–195. İstanbul: Orient Institut and Enstitut Francais d’Etudes Anatoliennes.
   Google Scholar
• Way, L.A., and S. Levitsky. 2007. “Linkage, leverage, and the post-communist divide.” East European Politics and Societies 21: 48–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, L. 2001. “Democracy and decolonization: East-central Europe.” In The international dimensions of democratization Europe and the Americas, edited by L. Whitehead, 356–391. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• YADA Foundation. 2010. Sivil toplum kuruluşları: İhtiyaçlar ve Sınırlılıklar [Civil society organizations: Needs and constraints]. İstanbul: YADA Foundation, Published Research.
   Google Scholar