The value of freedom: a case study of Ukraine

References

• Adam, F. 2008. Mapping social capital across Europe: Findings, trends and methodological shortcomings of cross-national surveys. Social Science Information 47, no. 2: 159–186.10.1177/0539018408089077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ailon, G. 2006. What B would otherwise do: A critique of conceptualizations of ‘power’ in organizational theory. Organization 13, no. 6: 771–800.10.1177/1350508406068504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. 1969. On violence. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Ashkanasy, N.M., and C. O’connor. 1997. Value congruence in leader–member exchange. The Journal of Social Psychology 137, no. 5: 647–662.10.1080/00224549709595486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, I. 1969. Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty, ed. I. Berlin, 118–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. [2001] 2004. Social research methods. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, R.H. [1937] 1988. The nature of the firm. In The firm, the market and the law, ed. R.H. Coase, 33–56. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J.S. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, J.R. 1939. Legal foundations of capitalism. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, A., D. Knights, and K. Starkey. 2008. The conditions of our freedom. Business Ethics Quarterly 18, no. 3: 299–320.10.5840/beq200818324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2009. Three conceptions of the relationship between power and liberty. In The SAGE handbook of power, eds. S.R. Clegg and M. Haugaard, 177–193. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9780857021014
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, H. 1998. Congruence theory explained. In Can democracy take root in post-Soviet Russia? Exploration in state-society relations, eds. H. Eckstein, F.J. Fleron, E.P. Hoffmann, and W.M. Reisinger, 3–33. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1975. Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison [Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison]. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1976. Histoire de la sexualité [The history of sexuality: An introduction]. Vol. 1, La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1984a. Histoire de la sexualité [The history of sexuality: The care of the self]. Vol. 3, Le souci de soi. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1984b. Histoire de la sexualité [The history of sexuality: The use of pleasure]. Vol. 2, L’usage des plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Gintis, Herbert. 2000. Game theory evolving: A problem-centered introduction to modeling strategic interactions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Göhler, G. 2009. ‘Power to’ and ‘power over’. In The SAGE handbook of power, eds. S.R. Clegg and M. Haugaard, 27–39. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9780857021014
   Google Scholar
• Guerin, D., F. Petry, and J. Crete. 2004. Tolerance, protest and democratic transition: Survey evidence from 13 post-communist countries. European Journal of Political Research 43, no. 3: 371–395.10.1111/ejpr.2004.43.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller, M. 2002. Theory and method in the comparative study of values: Critique and alternative to Inglehart. European Sociological Review 18, no. 2: 139–158.10.1093/esr/18.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsanyi, J.C. 1977. Rational behaviour and bargaining equilibrium in games and social situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511571756
   Google Scholar
• Hiley, D. 1987. Power and values in corporate life. Journal of Business Ethics 6, no. 5: 343–353.10.1007/BF00382890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoskins, B.L., and M. Mascherini. 2009. Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research 90, no. 3: 459–488.10.1007/s11205-008-9271-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, W. 2003. Methods: Doing social research. 3rd ed. Toronto: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jen, M.H., E.R. Sund, R. Johnston, and K. Jones. 2010. Trustful societies, trustful individuals, and health: An analysis of self-rated health and social trust using the World Value Survey. Health & Place 16: 1022–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jick, T.D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24, no. 4: 602–611.10.2307/2392366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. 2012. Twenty years as an independent state: Ukraine’s ten logical inconsistencies. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45, no. 4–5: 429–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T. 2014. Special section: Re-evaluating democratic revolutions, nationalism and organized crime in Ukraine from a comparative perspective. Introduction. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47, no. 2: 191–193.10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledyaev, V.G. 1997. Power: A conceptual analysis. Commack, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. 2005. Power: A radical view. 2nd ed. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1889. Capital: A critical analysis of capitalist production. New York: Appleton.
   Google Scholar
• Mascherini, M., D. Vidoni, and A.R. Manca. 2011. Exploring the determinants of civil participation in 14 European countries: One-size-fits none. European Sociological Review 27, no. 6: 790–807.10.1093/esr/jcq041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morriss, P. 2009. Power and liberalism. In The SAGE handbook of power, eds. S.R. Clegg and M. Haugaard, 54–69. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9780857021014
   Google Scholar
• Oleinik, A. 2009. Inquiring into communication in science: Alternative approaches. Science in Context 22, no. 4: 613–646.10.1017/S0269889709990184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleinik, A. 2010. Market as a weapon: The socio-economic machinery of dominance in Russia. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Oleinik, A. 2014. On content analysis of images of mass protests: A case of data triangulation. Quality & Quantity. doi:10.1007/s11135-014-0104-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1998. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1997. The American Political Science Review 92, no. 1: 1–22.10.2307/2585925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, D.W., ed. [1981] 1992. Macmillan dictionary of modern economics. 4th ed. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pohorila, N. 2009. Basis for regime legitimacy: Study of attitudes toward privatization in Ukraine. In Reforming the state without changing the model of power? On administrative reform in post-socialist countries, ed. A. Oleinik, 191–214. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pratchett, L. 2004. Local autonomy, local democracy and the ‘New Localism’. Political Studies 52, no. 2: 358–375.10.1111/post.2004.52.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, Milton. 1969. The role of values in public opinion research. The Public Opinion Quarterly 32, no. 4: 547–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R. 1995. La liberté, valeur fondamentale [Liberty as a fundamental value]. Revue Internationale des Sciences Sociales 145: 519–536.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2001. Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhovtsov, A., and A. Umland. 2014. Ukraine’s radical right. Journal of Democracy 25, no. 3: 58–63.10.1353/jod.2014.0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. 1951. A formal theory of the employment relationship. Econometrica 19, no. 3: 293–305.10.2307/1906815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. 2001. Theories of power and domination: The politics of empowerment in late modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. 2009. Power and democracy. In The SAGE handbook of power, eds. S.R. Clegg and M. Haugaard, 70–88. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.10.4135/9780857021014
   Google Scholar
• Timokhin, O. 2009. Intersub’ektivny vymir liberalizmy: do fenomenologii braterstva [An inter-subjective dimension of liberalism: Toward phenomenology of fraternity]. Filosofs’ka Dumka [Philosophical Thought] 1: 96–108.
   Google Scholar
• Touraine, A. 1994. Qu’est-ce que la démocratie? [What is democracy?]. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, R.M. 2008. Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wartenberg, T.E. 1990. The forms of power: From domination to transformation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. [1922] 1968. Economy and society: An outline of interpretative sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Values Survey Association. 2009. World Values Survey 1981–2008 Official Aggregate v.20090901. www.worldvaluessurvey.org. Aggregate file producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid.
   Google Scholar