References
- Beichelt, T. 2012. Forms of rule in the post-Soviet space: Hybrid regimes. In Presidents, Oligarchs and Bureaucrats: Forms of rule in the post-Soviet space, eds. Susan Stewart, Margarete Klein, Andrea Schmitz, and Hans-Henning Schröder. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, 15–28.
- Chandhoke, N. 2001. The ‘Civil’ and the ‘Political’ in civil society. Democratization 8, no. 2: 1–24.10.1080/714000194
- Cleary, L.R., and P. Caddick-Adams. 2015. Ukraine. In Security sector horizon scanning report, 2015, eds. Laura R Cleary and Andrew Dorman, 156–204. London: Crown Copyright.
- Cubitt, C. 2013. Constructing civil society: An intervention for building peace? Peacebuilding 1, no. 1: 91–108.10.1080/21647259.2013.756274
- D’Anieri, P. 2006. Understanding Ukrainian politics: Power, politics and institutional design. London: M E Sharpe.
- Encarnación, O. 2002. Venezuela’s ‘Civil Society Coup’. World Policy Journal XIX, 2: 38–48.
- EU. 2014. Ukraine: EU country roadmap for engagement with civil society, 2014–2017 July 31, Ares(2014)2557900-01/08/2014.
- Flikke, G. 2008. Pacts, parties and elite struggle: Ukraine’s troubled post-Orange transition. Europe-Asia Studies 60, no. 3: 375–396.10.1080/09668130801947986
- Goble, P.A. 2015. Russian newspaper: Regarding Ukraine, Putin’s actions undercut Putin’s arguments. EuroMaidan Press, June 10. http://euromaidanpress.com/2015/06/10/russian-newspaper-regarding-ukraine-putins-actions-undercut-putins-arguments/#arvlbdata.
- Gorobets, A. 2008. An independent Ukraine: Sustainable or unsustainable development? Communist and Post-Communist Studies 41, no. 1: 93–103.10.1016/j.postcomstud.2007.12.002
- Haran, O., and P. Burkovsky. 2015. From ‘Hybrid War’ to ‘Hybrid Peace’: One more ‘frozen conflict’? PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo no. 369.
- Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. 2015. http://www.internal-displacement.org/europe-the-caucasus-and-central-asia/ukraine/figures-analysis.
- Kräftner, J., L. Maï, and C. Druey. 2014. Ukraine 2014 – Civil society creating space between past and future: Informal follow up discussion. KOFF Roundtable Bern: Centre for Peacebuilding.
- Kroeber, C.B. 1996. Theory and history of revolution. Journal of World History 7, no. 1: 21–40.10.1353/jwh.2005.0056
- Kubicek, P. 2002. Civil society, trade unions and post-Soviet democratisation: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine. Europe-Asia Studies 54, no. 4: 603–624.10.1080/09668130220139181
- Kudelia, S. 2012. The sources of continuity and change of Ukraine’s incomplete state. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45: 417–428.10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.06.006
- Ljubownikow, S., J. Crotty, and P. Rodgers. 2013. The state and civil society in post-Soviet Russia: The development of a Russian-style civil society. Progress in Development Studies 13, no. 2: 153–166.10.1177/1464993412466507
- Mirimanova, N. 2014. Peacebuilding in Ukraine: What role for the EU: Civil society Dialogue Paper no. 8 (EPLO, 2014).
- Muskhelishvili, M., and G. Jorjoliani. 2009. Georgia’s ongoing struggle for a better future continued: Democracy promotion through civil society development. Democratization 16, no. 4: 682–708.10.1080/13510340903083000
- NATO. 2015, NIDC media report, June 12–18, PDD/UKR/2015.
- O’Brien, T. 2010. Problems of political transition in Ukraine: Leadership failure and democratic consolidation. Contemporary Politics 16, no. 4: 355–367.10.1080/13569775.2010.523936
- O’Brien, T. 2015. Perceptions and expectations: Divergent approaches to understanding social movement outcomes. Social Movement Studies 14, no. 1: 108–112.10.1080/14742837.2014.903169
- Onuch, O., and G. Sasse. 2014. What does Ukraine’s #Euromaidan teach us about protest? The Washington Post, February 27. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/02/27/what-does-ukraines-euromaidan-teach-us-about-protest/.
- OSCE. 2015. Thematic report: Civil society and crisis in Ukraine, February 11, SEC.FR/125/15/Corr.1*.
- Palyvoda, L. 2014. Civil society organisations in Ukraine: The State and dymanics (2002–2013). Kyiv: CCC Creative Center.
- Petrova, V. 2007. Civil society in post-Communist Eastern Europe and Eurasia: A cross-national analysis of micro- and macro-factors. World Development 35, no. 7: 1277–1305.10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.09.019
- Plokhy, S. 2014. The last empire: The final days of the Soviet Union. London: Oneworld Publications.
- Poroshenko, P. 2014. Address by the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko to the Joint Houses of the United States Congress, September 18, Washington, DC. http://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/31252.html.
- Poroshenko, P. 2015. On Ukraine’s international and domestic situation in 2015: Annual address to the Verkhovna Rada, Kyiv June 4.
- Pridham, G. 2014. EU/Ukraine relations and the crisis with Russia, 2013–14: A turning point. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs 49, no. 4: 53–61.10.1080/03932729.2014.965587
- Reuters. 2014. Ukraine Parliament pushes through sweeping anti-protest law, January 16. https://www.reuters.com/articl/2014/01/16/us-ukraine-law-idUSBREAOF12M20140116
- Riabchuk, M. 2012. Yanukovych’s two years in power. GMF On Wider Europe, March 2012. http://www.gmfus.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files_mf/riabchuk_yanukovychstwoyears_feb12.pdf.
- Riley-Smith, B. 2015. David Cameron a ‘foreign policy irrelevance’ over Russia, says former Britain top commander in NATO. Daily Telegraph, February 6. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/liberaldemocrats/11394788/David-Cameron-a-foreign-policy-irrelevance-over-Russia-says-Britains-former-top-commander-in-Nato.html
- Sakwa, R. 2015. ‘The death of Europe? Continental fates after Ukraine’ in International Affairs 91, no. 3: 553–559.
- Sherr, J. 2002. The army and society in Ukraine. In Soldiers and societies in post-Communist Europe: Legitimacy and change, eds. Anthony Forster, Timothy Edmunds, and Andrew Cottey, 219–236. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
- Toros, E. 2007. Understanding the role of civil society as an agent for democratic consolidation: The Turkish case. Turkish Studies 8, no. 3: 395–415.10.1080/14683840701489274
- Tudoroiu, T. 2007. ‘Rose, Orange, and Tulip: The failed post-Soviet revolution. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40: 315–342.
- Tusalem, R. 2007. A boon or a bane? The role of civil society in third and fourth-wave democracies. International Political Science Review 28, no. 3: 361–386.10.1177/0192512107077097
- Varga, M. 2013. State strategies of resisting social accountability: Post-Soviet insights. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures 27, no. 4: 727–742.10.1177/0888325413493114
- Venice Commission. 2015. Avis préliminaire sur le projet de révision de la Constitution concernant la structure territoriale et l'administration locale de l'Ukraine [Preliminary advice on the revision of the Constitution concerning the territorial structure and local administration of Ukraine], June 24. http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-PI(2015)008-f.
- Vorbrugg, A. 2015. Governing through civil society? The making of a post-Soviet political subject in Ukraine. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33, no. 1: 136–153.10.1068/d13055p
- Wise, C.R., and T.L. Brown. 1999. The separation of powers in Ukraine. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 32, no. 1: 23–44.10.1016/S0967-067X(98)00020-8
- The Telegraph. 2015. Minsk agreement on Ukraine crisis: Text in full. February 12. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/11408266/Minsk-agreement-on-Ukraine-crisis-text-in-full.html.
- Kyiv Post. 2015. UK Ambassador’s parting message in Kyiv: Tackle corruption or risk losing support. September 3. http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/uk-ambassadors-parting-message-in-kyiv-tackle-corruption-or-risk-losing-support-397151.html