Examining state capacity in the context of electoral authoritarianism, regime formation and consolidation in Russia and Turkey

References

• Adaman, F., and A. Çarkoğlu. 2013. Determinants of tax evasion by households: Evidence from Turkey. In Turkey's democratization process, eds. C. Rodriguez, A. Avalos, H. Yilmaz and A.I. Planet, 241–252. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, D., J. Møller, L. Lykke Rørbæk, and S.-E. Skaaning. 2014. State capacity and political regime stability. Democratization 21, no. 7: 1305–1325.10.1080/13510347.2014.960204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbatlı, E. 2014. Turkey’s new path: The rise of electoral authoritarianism. Research Turkey. http://researchturkey.org/turkeys-new-path-the-rise-of-electoral-authoritarianism/.
   Google Scholar
• Bacik, G. 2001. Turkey and Russia: Whither modernization? Journal of Economic and Social Research 3, no. 2: 51–71.
   Google Scholar
• Bedirhanoğlu, P. 2015. Corruption and state under the AKP rule in Turkey: Retreat from the modern bourgeois state? Research Turkey. http://researchturkey.org/corruption-and-state-under-the-akp-rule-in-turkey-retreat-from-the-modern-bourgeois-state/.
   Google Scholar
• Bekmen, A. 2014. State and capital in Turkey during the neoliberal era. In Turkey reframed: Constituting neoliberal hegemony, eds. I. Akca, A. Bekmen, and B. Alp Özden, 47–74. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellin, E. 2004. The robustness of authoritarianism in the middle east: Exceptionalism in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics 36, no. 2: 139–157.10.2307/4150140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. 2009. Reading Russia: Forms without substance. Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2: 47–51.10.1353/jod.0.0070
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. 2011. Turkey’s 2011 election: Towards a dominant party system. Insight Turkey 13, no. 3: 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. 2002. The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy 13, no. 1: 6–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, R. 2015. Troubled times: Stagnation, sanctions and the prospects of economic reform in Russia. London: Chatham House Research Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Darden, K. 2008. The integrity of corrupt states: Graft as an informal state institution. Politics and Society 36, no. 1: 35–60.10.1177/0032329207312183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. 1996. Is the third wave over? Journal of Democracy 7, no. 3: 20–37.10.1353/jod.1996.0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easter, G.M. 2002. Politics of revenue extraction in post-communist states: Poland and Russia compared. Politics and Society 30, no. 4: 599–627.10.1177/003232902237828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucompret, E., and P. Konings. 2006. Turkish accession to the EU: Satisfying the Copenhagen criteria. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, J. 2010. A tool to evaluate state capacity in post-communist countries. European Journal of Political Research 49: 654–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin-Rittberger, J. 2014. Exploring the relationship between infrastructural and coercive state capacity. Democratization 21, no. 7: 1244–1264.10.1080/13510347.2014.960207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2004. The imperative of state-building. Journal of Democracy 15, no. 2: 17–31.10.1353/jod.2004.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans-Morse, J. 2012. Threats to property rights in Russia: From coercion to state aggression. Post-Soviet Affairs 28, no. 3: 263–295.10.2747/1060-586X.28.3.263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. 1999. What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. 2011. Institution building and ‘institutional traps’ in Russian politics. In Russia in 2020: Scenarios for the future, eds. M. Lipman and N. Petrov, 215–232. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. 2015. Authoritarian Russia: Analyzing post-soviet regime changes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Göcer Akder, D., and M. Herzog. 2014. Turkey and the Arab spring. In The Routledge handbook of the Arab spring, ed. L. Sadiki, 503–514. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. 2011. The regional roots of electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 63, no. 4: 623–640.10.1080/09668136.2011.566427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürleyen, I. 2014. What did they promise for democracy and what did they deliver? In Turkey's democratization process, eds. C. Rodriguez, A. Avalos, H. Yilmaz, and A.I. Planet, 109–130. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, J.K., and R. Sigman. 2011. Leviathan’s latent dimensions: Measuring state capacity for comparative political research. APSA 2011 annual meeting paper. http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/johanson/papers/hanson_sigman13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, M. 2014. Introduction. In Turkey and the politics of national identity: Social, economic and political transformations, eds. S. Brennan and M. Herzog, 1–19. London: IB Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Higley, J., and R. Gunther, eds. 1992. Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, F., and Ö. Taşpınar. 2006. Turkey and Russia: Axis of the excluded? Survival 48, no. 1: 81–92.10.1080/00396330600594256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones Luong, P., and E. Weinthal. 2004. Contra coercion: Russian tax reform, exogenous shocks and negotiated institutional change. American Political Science Review 98, no. 1: 139–152.10.1017/S0003055404001054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. 2005. Turkish dynamics: Bridge across troubled lands. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781403978660
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycioğlu, E. 2012. Political culture. In Routledge handbook of modern Turkey, eds. M. Heper and S. Sayari, 171–182. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kastueva-Jean, T. 2015. Russia’s domestic evolution: What impact on its foreign policy. Russie. Nei.Visions no. 84.
   Google Scholar
• Kayaalp, E. 2015. Remaking politics, markets and citizens in Turkey: Governing through smoke. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Konak, N., and R. Özgür Dönmez. 2015. Deconstructing a neopatrimonial via humour: Gezi Park ‘capulcu‬’ protests in Turkey. In Waves of social movement mobilizations in the twenty-first century, eds. N. Konak and R. Özgür Dönmez, 59–82‬. ‬Plymouth: Lexington Books.‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L.A. Way. 2002. The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy 13, no. 2: 51–65.10.1353/jod.2002.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J. 1997. Democracy today: an Agenda for Students of Democracy. Scandinavian Political Studies 20, no. 2: 115–134.10.1111/scps.1997.20.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linz, J.J., and A. Stepan. 1996. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. 1984. The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. Archives Européenes de Sociologie 25: 185–213.10.1017/S0003975600004239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mau, V. 2016. Russia’s economic policy in 2015–2016: The imperative of structural reform. Post-Soviet Affairs. Published online, August 16, 2016. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2016.1215679.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, A., and D. Stukal. 2012. (Re-)building the ship of state at sea? State capacity and regime dynamics in post-communist countries. National Research University, Higher School of Economics Research Paper. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/higwpaper/07_2fps_2f2012.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Migdal, J.S. 1998. Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Motyl, A.J. 2016. Lights out for the putin regime: The coming Russian collapse. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/2016-01-27/lights-out-putin-regime.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. 2012. The triumph of conservative globalism: The political economy of the AKP era. Turkish Studies 13, no. 2: 135–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamuk, Ş. 2008. Economic change in twentieth-century Turkey: Is the glass more than half full? In The Cambridge history of Turkey, vol. 4, ed. R. Kasaba, 266–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CHOL9780521620963
   Google Scholar
• Pérouse, J.-F. 2015. The state without the public. In Order and compromise: Government practices in Turkey from the late Ottoman Empire to the early 21st century, eds. M. Aymes, B. Gourisse, and Élise Massicard, 169–191. Amsterdam: Brill.10.1163/9789004289857
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, N. 2016. Putin’s downfall: The coming crisis of the Russian regime. European Council on Foreign Relations. http://www.ecfr.eu/publications/summary/putins_downfall_the_coming_crisis_of_the_russian_regime7006.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2006. Annual address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. President of Russia Official Web Portal, May 10, 2006. www.kremlin.ru/eng.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2012. Annual address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. President of Russia Official Web Portal, December 12, 2012. www.kremlin.ru/transcripts/17118.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, N. 2014. The political origins of Russia’s ‘culture wars’. Limerick: Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Limerick. http://www.academia.edu/6902059/The_Political_Origins_of_Russias_Culture_Wars.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. 2005. Federalism and electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Demokratizatsiya 13, no. 3: 347–371.10.3200/DEMO.13.3.347-372
   Google Scholar
• Ross, C. 2011. Regional elections and electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 63, no. 4: 641–662.10.1080/09668136.2011.566428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savran, S. 2015. Class, state and religion in Turkey. In The neoliberal landscape and Islamist capital in Turkey, eds. N. Balkan, E. Balkan, and A. Öncü, 41–88. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. 2002. The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy 13: 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedler, A. 2013. The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199680320.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sinovets, P., and B. Renz. 2015. Russia’s 2014 military doctrine and beyond: Threat perceptions, capabilities and ambitions. NATO Defense College Research Paper no. 117, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. 1985. Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. In Bringing the state back in, eds. P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol, 3–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511628283
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, R. 2014. The Putin factor: Personalism, protest, and regime stability in Russia. Politics and Policy 42, no. 4: 567–592.10.1111/polp.2014.42.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Sözen, S. 2013. New public administration in Turkey. In Turkey's democratization process, eds. C. Rodriguez, A. Avalos, H. Yilmaz, and A.I. Planet, 223–240. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stepan, A. 1990. On the tasks of a democratic opposition. Journal of Democracy 1, no. 2: 41–49.10.1353/jod.1990.0021
   Google Scholar
• Stoner-Weiss, K. 2006. Resisting the state: Reform and retrenchment in post-soviet Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511510403
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B.D. 2011. State building in Putin’s Russia: Policing and coercion after communism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511974144
   Google Scholar
• Tillman, E. 2015. Sultanism or not? Debating Turkish politics. From the Potomac to the Euphrates. http://blogs.cfr.org/cook/2015/02/23/sultanism-or-not-debating-turkish-politics/.
   Google Scholar
• Tompson, W. 2005. Putting Yukos in perspective. Post-Soviet Affairs 21, no. 2: 159–181.10.2747/1060-586X.21.2.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency International. 2016. Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. Berlin: Transparency International, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Tsygankov, A.P. 2014. The strong state in Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199336203.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Uluslararası Şeffaflik Derneği. 2015. Corruption in Turkey: Why, how, where. Istanbul: Uluslararası Şeffaflik Derneği.
   Google Scholar
• Ulusoy, K. 2014. Turkey's fight against corruption: A critical assessment. Istanbul: Istanbul Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Volkov, V. 2002. The selective use of state capacity in Russia’s economy: Property disputes and enterprise takeovers after 2000. PONARS Policy Memo no. 273, Washington D.C., USA.
   Google Scholar
• Warhola, J.W., and W.A. Mitchell. 2006. The warming of Turkish and Russian relations. Demokratisatziya 14, no. 1: 127–143.10.3200/DEMO.14.1.127-143
   Google Scholar
• Way, L. 2005. Authoritarian state building and the source of regime competitiveness in the fourth wave: The cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine. World Politics 57, no. 2: 231–261.10.1353/wp.2005.0018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Way, L. 2006. Authoritarian failure: How does state weakness strengthen electoral competition? In Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition, ed. A. Schedler, 167–180. Colorado, CO: Lynne Riener.
   Google Scholar
• White, D. 2013. Taking it to the streets: Raising the costs of electoral authoritarianism in Russia. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 14, no. 4: 582–598.10.1080/15705854.2013.840169
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, E. 2012. Putin’s Russia as a model for Erdogan’s Turkey. Journal of Political Inquiry 5, no. 5: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. 1997. The rise of illiberal democracy. Foreign Affairs 76, no. 6: 22–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. 2007. The future of freedom: Illiberal democracy at home and abroad. New York: W.W.Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Zakaria, F. 2015. What in the world: Turkey’s transition into an illiberal democracy. In What in the world, April 21. http://edition.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/04/17/what-in-the-world-turkeys-transition-into-an-illiberal-democracy.cnn.
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A. 2011. After defeat: How the east learnt to live with the west. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar