Inter-party competition on Facebook in a non-election period in Turkey: equalization or normalization?

References

• Akgün, M.H. 2018. 24 Haziran’a giderken seçim sisteminde neler değişti?. SETA 5 Soru, June 01, https://www.setav.org/5-soru-24-hazirana-giderken-secim-sisteminde-neler-degisti/
   Google Scholar
• Bastos, M.T., and D. Mercea. 2017. The Brexit Botnet and user-generated hyperpartisan news. Social Science Computer Review doi:10.1177/0894439317734157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessi, A., and E. Ferrara. 2016. Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion. First Monday 21: 11. doi:10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, D. 2018. Brexit: Russia had four times more social media impact than Leave campaign. International Business Times, February 12, https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/brexit-russia-had-four-times-more-social-media-impact-leave-campaign-1660753.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, T., and G. Djupsund. 2001. Old wine in new bottles? The 1999 finnish election campaign on the internet. International Journal of Press/Politics 6: 68–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, T., and S. Kim. 2008. Riding the web 2.0 wave: Candidates on YouTube in the 2007 Finnish national elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 5: 159–74. doi:10.1080/19331680802291475.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M., and D. Dorner. 2004. An evaluation of New Zealand political party websites. Information Research 9: 4. http://informationr.net/ir/9–4/paper196.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D.M., and P. Webb. 2000. Political parties as campaign organizations. Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies, ed., R.J. Dalton, and M.P. Wattenberg 102–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R. 2010. Open source campaigning?: UK party organisations and the use of the new media in the 2010 general election. Paper presented for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington D.C. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1723329. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1723329
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., A. Römmele, and S. Ward. 2003a. German parties in the 2002 federal election. German Politics 12: 79–108. doi:10.1080/09644000412331307534.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R., and I. McAllister. 2015. Normalising or equalising party competition? assessing the impact of the web on election campaigning. Political Studies 63: 529–47. doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R.K., and I. McAllister. 2011. Do online election campaigns win votes? The 2007 Australian ‘YouTube’ election. Political Communication 28: 227–44. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.568042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R.K., J.L. Newell, and S.J. Ward. 2000. New parties, new media: Italian party politics and the internet. South European Society and Politics 5: 123–36. doi:10.1080/13608740508539595.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, R.K., M. Margolis, D. Resnick, and S.J. Ward. 2003b. Election campaigning on the WWW in the USA and UK: A comparative analysis. Party Politics 9: 47–75. doi:10.1177/135406880391004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R.K., and S. Ward. 2002. Virtual campaigning: Australian parties and the impact of the internet. Australian Journal of Political Science 37: 99–129. doi:10.1080/13603100220119047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, R.K., W. Lusoli, and S. Ward. 2008. Nationalizing and normalizing the local? A comparative analysis of online candidate campaigning in Australia and Britain. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 4: 15–30. doi:10.1080/19331680801979070.
   Google Scholar
• Gorodnichenko, Y., T. Pham, and O. Talavera. 2018. Social media, sentiment and public opinions: Evidence from #brexit and #uselection. Working Papers 2018-01, Swansea University, School of Management. https://rahwebdav.swan.ac.uk/repec/pdf/WP2018-01.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gueorguieva, V. 2008. Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Social Science Computer Review 26: 288–300. doi:10.1177/0894439307305636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrman, J. 2016. ‘Brexit’ talk on social media favored the ‘Leave’ side. New York Times, June 26, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/25/business/brexit-talk-on-social-media-heavily-favored-the-leave-side.html?nytmobile=0.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. 2016. Turkey’s digital divides. Washington D.C.: Center for American Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P.N., and B. Kollanyi. 2016. Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: Computational propaganda during the U.K.-EU Referendum. Computational Propaganda Project: Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P.N., B. Kollanyi, and S. Woolley. 2016. Bots and automation over Twitter during the US election. Computational Propaganda Project: Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P.N., S. Woolley, and R. Calo. 2018. Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: The challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 15: 81–93. doi:10.1080/19331681.2018.1448735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C.-L., and H.W. Park. 2012. Mapping online social networks of Korean politicians. Government Information Quarterly 29: 169–81. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Internet World Stats. 2018. Internet stats and Facebook usage in Europe December 2017 Statistics. https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N.A., and D.G. Lilleker. 2009. Building an architecture of participation? Political parties and web 2.0 in Britain. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 6: 232–50. doi:10.1080/19331680903028438.
   Google Scholar
• Kalnes, Ø. 2009. Norwegian parties and web 2.0. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 6: 251–66. doi:10.1080/19331680903041845.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U. 2013. Mastering the art of social media: Swiss parties, the 2011 national election and digital challenges. Information, Communication & Society 16: 717–36. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.782329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc-Michalska, K., D.G. Lilleker, A. Smith, and D. Weissmann. 2016. The normalization of online campaigning in the web.2.0 era. European Journal of Communication 31: 331–50. doi:10.1177/0267323116647236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc-Michalska, K., R. Gibson, and T. Vedel. 2014. Online campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political actors and citizens in the aftermath of the Web.2.0 evolution. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 11: 220–44. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.903217.
   Google Scholar
• Kurulu, Y.S. 2015a. 7 Haziran 2015 Kesin Seçim Sonuçları. https://www.ysk.gov.tr/doc/dosyalar/docs/Milletvekili/7Haziran2015/KesinSecimSonuclari/ResmiGazete/D.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kurulu, Y.S. 2015b. 1 Kasım 2015 Kesin Seçim Sonuçları. https://www.ysk.gov.tr/doc/dosyalar/docs/Milletvekili/1Kasim2015/KesinSecimSonuclari/96-D.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A.O. 2016. Online, all the time? A quantitative assessment of the permanent campaign on Facebook. New Media & Society 18: 1–19. doi:10.1177/1461444814538798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A.O. 2017. Going viral? Comparing parties on social media during the 2014 Swedish election. Convergence: the International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 23: 117–31. doi:10.1177/1354856515577891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A.O., and H. Moe. 2014. Triumph of the underdogs? Comparing Twitter use by political actors during two Norwegian election campaigns. Sage Open 4: 1–13. doi:10.1177/2158244014559015.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A.O., and J. Svensson. 2014. Politicians online – Identifying current research opportunities. First Monday 19: 4. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4897/3874 doi:10.5210/fm.v19i4.4897.
   Google Scholar
• Lev-On, A., and S. Haleva-Amir. 2018. Normalizing or equalizing? Characterizing Facebook campaigning. New Media & Society 20: 720–39. doi:10.1177/1461444816669160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D.G., K. Koc-Michalska, E.J. Schweitzer, M. Jacunski, N. Jackson, and T. Vedel. 2011. Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning. European Journal of Communication 26: 195–213. doi:10.1177/0267323111416182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilleker, D.G., and N. Jackson. 2010. Towards a more participatory style of election campaigning: The impact of web 2.0 on the UK 2010 general election. Policy & Internet 2: 69–98. doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1064.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, C., and L. Cram. 2016. The results are in and the UK will #Brexit: What did social media tell us about the UK’s EU referendum? EU referendum analysis 2016: Media, voters and the campaign early reflections from leading UK academics, ed., D. Jackson, E. Thorsen, and D. Wring 90–91. Poole, UK: The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, M., D. Resnick, and J. Levy. 2003. Major parties dominate, minor parties struggle: US elections and the Internet. Political parties and internet: Net gain? ed., R. Gibson, P. Dixon, and S. Ward 53–69. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, M., D. Resnick, and J. Wolfe. 1999. Party competition on the internet in the United States and Britain. International Journal of Press/Politics 4: 24–47. doi:10.1177/1081180X9900400403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Max, H., and S. Bauchowitz. 2017. Tweeting for Brexit: How social media influenced the referendum. Brexit, Trump and the Media, ed., J. Mair, T. Clark, R. Snoddy, and R. Tait 31–35. Suffolk: Abramis.
   Google Scholar
• Miş, N., and H. Duran. 2018. Seçim ittifakları. SETA Analiz, Sayı: 232. Ankara: SETA.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, J.L. 2001. Italian political parties on the web. International Journal of Press/Politics 6: 60–87. doi:10.1177/108118001129172341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2000. A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2003. Preaching to the converted? Pluralism, participation and party websites. Party Politics 9: 21–45. doi:10.1177/135406880391003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSCE. 2016. Republic of Turkey early parliamentary elections (1 November 2015). Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• OSCE. 2018. Republic of Turkey early presidential and parliamentary elections (24 June 2015). Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR Limited Election Observation Mission Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• PACE. 2015. Observation of the early parliamentary elections in Turkey (1 November2015). Election observation report (Doc. 13922). Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• PACE. 2018. Observation of the early presidential and parliamentary elections in Turkey (24 June 2018). Election observation report (Doc. 14608). Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Paolino, P., and D.R. Shaw. 2003. Can the internet help outsider candidates win the presidential nomination? Political Science and Politics 36: 193–97. doi:10.1017/S1049096503002063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polonski, V. 2016. Impact of social media on the outcome of the EU referendum. EU referendum analysis 2016: Media, voters and the campaign early reflections from leading UK academics, ed., D. Jackson, E. Thorsen, and D. Wring 94–95. Poole, UK: The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, B. 2018. Social media firms must tell users exposed to Brexit propaganda, MP says. The Guardian 10 February https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/feb/10/social-media-firms-must-tell-users-impacted-by-propaganda-mp-says.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B., 2013. Studying Facebook via data extraction: The Netvizz application. In WebSci ‘13 Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 346–55. New York: ACM. doi:10.1177/1753193413484630
   Google Scholar
• Samuel-Azran, T., M. Yarchi, and G. Wolfsfeld. 2015. Equalization versus normalization: Facebook and the 2013 Israeli elections. Social Media+Society doi:10.1177/2056305115605861.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, E.J. 2008. Innovation or normalization in e-campaigning? A longitudinal content and structural analysis of German party websites in the 2002 and 2005 national elections. European Journal of Communication 23: 449–70. doi:10.1177/0267323108096994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, E.J. 2011. Normalization 2.0: A longitudinal analysis of German online campaigns in the national elections 2002–9. European Journal of Communication 26: 310–27. doi:10.1177/0267323111423378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, T.A. 2008. Equal access, unequal success-major and minor Canadian parties on the net. Part Politics 14: 51–70. doi:10.1177/1354068807083823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southern, R. 2015. Is web 2.0 providing a voice for outsiders? A comparison of personal web site and social media use by candidates at the 2010 UK general election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12: 1–17. doi:10.1080/19331681.2014.972603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. 2018. Penetration of leading social networks in Turkey as of 3rd and 4th quarter 2017, by platform. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/284503/turkey-social-network-penetration/.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K. 2006. Parties, candidates and citizens on-line: Studies of politics on the internet. Turku, Finland: Abo Akademi University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K. 2009. Online campaigning: An opening for the outsiders? An analysis of Finnish parliamentary candidates’ websites in the 2003 election campaign. New Media & Society 11: 835–54. doi:10.1177/1461444809105355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandberg, K. 2013. A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections. New Media & Society 15: 1329–47. doi:10.1177/1461444812470612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tkach-Kawasaki, L.M. 2003. Politics@Japan: Party competition on the internet in Japan. Party Politics 9: 105–23. doi:10.1177/135406880391006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usherwood, S., and K. Wright. 2016. Talking past each other: The Twitter campaigns. EU referendum analysis 2016: Media, voters and the campaign early reflections from leading UK academics, ed., D. Jackson, E. Thorsen, and D. Wring 96–97. Poole, UK: The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community.
   Google Scholar
• Ustabulut, B. 2018. Temsilde adalet ve yönetimde istikrar ilkeleri çerçevesinde Türkiye’de ülke seçim barajı uygulaması. Insan Ve Insan 5: 341–58. doi:10.29224/insanveinsan.424338.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S., R. Gibson, and P. Nixon. 2003. Parties and the internet: An overview. Political Parties and Internet: Net gain? ed., R. Gibson, P. Dixon, and S. Ward 11–38. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• We Are Social. 2016. Digital In 2016: We are social’s compendium of global digital, social, and mobile data, trends, and statistics. https://d1ri6y1vinkzt0.cloudfront.net/media/documents/We%20Ares%20Social%20Digital%20in%202016v02-160126235031.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• We Are Social. 2017. Digital in 2017. https://wearesocial.com/blog/2017/01/digital-in-2017-global-overview.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C.B., and G.J. Gulati. 2009. Facebook grows up: An empirical assessment of its role in the 2008 congressional elections. Paper prepared for the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 2–5. http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/3/6/1/5/3/pages361533/p361533-1.php.
   Google Scholar