References
- Alexandrova‐Arbatova, N. 2009. The impact of the Caucasus Crisis on regional and European security. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 93: 287–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902934291.
- Anders, T., C.J. Fariss, and J.N. Markowitz. 2020. Bread before Guns or Butter: Introducing Surplus Domestic Product (SDP). International Studies Quarterly 642: 392–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa013.
- Antonenko, O. 2009. Towards a comprehensive regional security framework in the Black Sea Region after the Russia–Georgia War. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 93: 259–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902934275.
- Antonenko, O., and B. Giegerich. 2009. Rebooting NATO–Russia Relations. Survival 512: 13–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330902860751.
- Appathurai, J. 2006. NATO speech: Briefing by NATO Spokesman - MOD 8 June 2006. June 8 2006. https://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2006/s060608m.htm
- Arel, D. 2008. Ukraine since the war in Georgia. Survival 506: 15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330802601826.
- Asmus, R.D. 2006. Next steps in forging a Euroatlantic strategy for the Wider Black Sea. German Marshall Fund of the United States, Brussels.
- Aydın, M. 2009. Geographical blessing versus Geopolitical Curse: Great power security Agendas for the Black Sea Region and a Turkish alternative. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 93: 271–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902934283.
- Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979.
- Becker, J. 2017. The correlates of transatlantic burden sharing: Revising the agenda for theoretical and policy analysis. Defense & Security Analysis 332: 131–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2017.1311039.
- Becker, J. 2019. Accidental rivals? EU Fiscal Rules, NATO, and transatlantic burden-sharing. Journal of Peace Research 565: 697–713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319829690.
- Becker, J. and E. Malesky. 2017. The continent or the ‘Grand Large’? Strategic culture and operational burden-sharing in NATO. International Studies Quarterly 611: 163–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw039.
- Biermann, R. 2008. Towards a theory of inter-organizational networking. The Review of International Organizations 32: 151–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-007-9027-9.
- Borou, O. 2009. The Wider Black Sea Region in the 21st century: Strategic, economic and energy perspectives. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 93: 383–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902934366.
- Bove, V. and E. Cavatorta. 2012. From conscription to volunteers: Budget shares in NATO defence spending. Defence and Peace Economics 233: 273–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2011.563973.
- Brambor, T., W.R. Clark, and M. Golder. 2006. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 141: 63–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi014.
- Brauer, J. 2002. Survey and review of the defense economics literature on Greece and Turkey: What have we learned? Defence and Peace Economics 132: 85–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10242690210969.
- Bulgaria, Republic of. 1999. Military doctrine of the Republic of Bulgaria.
- Bulgaria. 2009. White paper on defence and the armed forces of the Republic of Bulgaria.
- Bulgaria. 2011. National security strategy.
- Bulgaria. 2014. National programme: Bulgaria in NATO and in European defence 2020.
- Bulgaria. 2017. National plan for increasing the defense spending to 2% of the gross domestic product until 2024.
- Chiriac, M. 2015. Romania sticks to its tough line on Kosovo. Balkan Insight (blog). October 28 2015. https://balkaninsight.com/2015/10/28/romania-continues-not-to-recognize-kosovo-10-28-2015
- Ciută, F. 2007. Parting the Black Sea (Region): Geopolitics, institutionalisation and the reconfiguration of European security. European Security 161: 51–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830701442402.
- Coskun, B.B. 2013. Turkey. In Strategic cultures in Europe: Security and defence policies across the continent, 359–70. Potsdam: Springer.
- Cross, S. 2015. NATO–Russia security challenges in the Aftermath of Ukraine conflict: Managing Black Sea security and beyond. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 152: 151–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2015.1060017.
- Csergő, Z. 2013. Kosovo and the framing of non-secessionist self-government claims in Romania. Europe-Asia Studies 655: 889–911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.805960.
- Davutoğlu, A. 2010. Turkey’s zero-problems foreign policy. Foreign Policy 205: 2010.
- DiGiuseppe, M. 2015. Guns, Butter, and Debt: Sovereign creditworthiness and military expenditure. Journal of Peace Research 525: 680–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343315587970.
- Dunlop, J.B. and R. Menon. 2006. Chaos in the North Caucasus and Russia’s future. Survival 482: 97–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330600765484.
- Eichenberg, R.C. and R.J. Stoll. 2017. The acceptability of war and support for defense spending: Evidence from fourteen democracies, 2004–2013. Journal of Conflict Resolution 614: 788–813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002715600760.
- European Commission. 2016. Numerical fiscal rules in EU member countries. Text. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/indicators-statistics/economic-databases/fiscal-governance-eu-member-states/numerical-fiscal-rules-eu-member-countries_en
- European Council. 2016. European council meeting (15 December 2016) - conclusions. December 15 2016. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21929/15-euco-conclusions-final.pdf
- Fearon, James D., and David D. Laitin. 2008. “Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Fischer, S. 2009. The European Union and security in the Black Sea Region after the Georgia Crisis. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 93: 333–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902934325.
- Frühling, S., and G. Lasconjarias. 2016. NATO, A2/AD and the Kaliningrad challenge. Survival 582: 95–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2016.1161906.
- George, J., and T. Sandler. 2018. Demand for military spending in NATO, 1968–2015:A spatial panel approach. European Journal of Political Economy 53: 222–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.09.002.
- Gerring, J. 2007. Is there a (Viable) crucial-case method? Comparative Political Studies 403: 231–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006290784.
- Gerring, J. 2011. The case study. The Oxford Handbook of Political ScienceJuly, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0051.
- Goldsmith, B.E. 2003. Bearing the defense burden, 1886-1989: Why spend more? Journal of Conflict Resolution 475: 551–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002703254297.
- Græger, N. 2016. European security as practice: EU–NATO communities of practice in the making? European Security 254: 478–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2016.1236021.
- Gray, C.S. 2010. The strategy bridge: Theory for practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gülden, A.S. 2014. Turkey and Iran: Between friendly competition and Fierce Rivalry. Arab Studies Quarterly 361: 6–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13169/arabstudquar.36.1.0006.
- Gunter, M.M. 2015. Iraq, Syria, ISIS and the Kurds: Geostrategic concerns for the US and Turkey. Middle East Policy 221: 102–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12116.
- Haftel, Y.Z., and S.C. Hofmann. 2017. Institutional authority and security cooperation within regional economic organizations. Journal of Peace Research 544: 484–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316675908.
- Hartley, K., and T. Sandler. 1999. NATO burden-sharing: Past and future. Journal of Peace Research 366: 665–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343399036006004.
- Hofmann, S.C. 2009. Overlapping institutions in the Realm of international security: The case of NATO and ESDP. Perspectives on Politics 71: 45–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090070.
- Istomin, I., and I. Bolgova. 2016. Transnistrian strategy in the context of Russian–Ukrainian relations: The rise and failure of ‘Dual Alignment’. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 161: 169–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1148412.
- Johnson, A.R. 1981. The Warsaw pact: Soviet military policy in Eastern Europe. RAND CORP SANTA MONICA CA, Santa Monica.
- Karaosmanoǧlu, A.L. 2000. The evolution of the national security culture and the military in Turkey. Journal of International Affairs 541: 199–216.
- Lepgold, J. 1998. NATO’s post-cold war collective action problem. International Security 231: 78–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.78.
- Makarychev, A., and V. Morozov. 2011. Multilateralism, multipolarity, and beyond: A menu of Russia’s policy strategies emerging powers and multilateralism in the twenty-first century. Global Governance 173: 353–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-01703006.
- Marcu, S. 2009. The geopolitics of the Eastern border of the European Union: The case of Romania-Moldova-Ukraine. Geopolitics 143: 409–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040802693796.
- Melvin, N.J. 2018. Rebuilding collective security in the Black Sea Region. SIPRI Policy Paper 50: 84.
- Micu, M. 2013. Romania. In Strategic cultures in Europe: Security and defence policies across the continent, ed. H. Biehl, B. Giegerich and A. Jonas, 293–306. Potsdam: Springer.
- Miller, C. 2017. Why the Black Sea? - Foreign policy research institute. https://Www.Fpri.Org. January 23 2017. https://www.fpri.org/article/2017/01/why-the-black-sea
- Murdoch, J.C., and T. Sandler. 1984. Complementarity, free riding, and the military expenditures of NATO Allies. Journal of Public Economics 251–2: 83–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(84)90045-8.
- Murinson, A. 2006. The strategic depth doctrine of Turkish foreign policy. Middle Eastern Studies 426: 945–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00263200600923526.
- NATO. 2014. Wales summit declaration issued by the heads of state and government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic council in Wales. NATO. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_112964.htm
- NATO. 2019. Information on defence expenditures. NATO. November 29 2019. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_49198.htm
- Newnham, R. 2011. Oil, carrots, and sticks: Russia’s energy resources as a foreign policy tool. Journal of Eurasian Studies 22: 134–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2011.03.004.
- Nieto, W., and A.S. Cornejo. 2008. A drop in the ocean: Bulgaria’s NATO membership and Black Sea geopolitics. European Security 174: 517–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830802569004.
- Niu, Q. 2017. Can China help GUAM diversify away from Russia? Foreign Policy Research Institute, June, 9.
- Nordhaus, W. J.R. Oneal, and B. Russett. 2012. The effects of the international security environment on national military expenditures: A multicountry study. International Organization 663: 491–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000173.
- Oğuzlu, T. 2008. Middle easternization of Turkey’s foreign policy: Does Turkey dissociate from the West? Turkish Studies 91: 3–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840701813960.
- Oma, I.M. 2012. Explaining states’ burden-sharing behaviour within NATO. Cooperation and Conflict 474: 562–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836712462856.
- Paillard, C. 2007. Go East, Young European! The Black Sea is now yours: A French view on energy strategies in the Black Sea Region. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 72: 237–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850701402094.
- Pamir, N. 2007. The Black Sea: A gateway to energy security and diversification. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 72: 245–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850701402151.
- Permanent Delegation of Romania to NATO. 2019. Defence investment pledge. January 2019. https://nato.mae.ro/en/node/1015
- Ringsmose, J. 2009. Paying for protection: Denmark’s military expenditure during the cold war. Cooperation and Conflict 441: 73–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836708099722.
- Romania. 2004. Military strategy.
- Romania. 2006. Romania - Foreign relations and national security.
- Romania. 2007. The national security strategy of Romania.
- Romania. 2015. National defence strategy 2015-2019.
- Romania. 2017. Romanian defence 2017.
- Sanders, D. 2007. Rhetoric and reality: Can Ukraine create an effective navy to protect its interests in the Black Sea? European Security 162: 143–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830701529752.
- Sanders, D. 2009. Maritime security in the Black Sea: Can regional solutions work?. European Security 182: 101–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662830903433720.
- Sandler, T., and J.F. Forbes. 1980. Burden sharing, strategy, and the design of NATO. Economic Inquiry 183: 425–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1980.tb00588.x.
- Seawright, J., and J. Gerring. 2008. Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly 612: 294–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077.
- Simon, J. 2009. Ukraine needs to decide its strategic alignment. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 93: 367–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902934358.
- Simón, L. 2015. Understanding US retrenchment in Europe. Survival 572: 157–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2015.1026093.
- SIPRI. 2018. SIPRI military expenditure database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/milex
- SIPRI. 2019. SIPRI arms industry database. https://www.sipri.org/databases/armsindustry
- Smyth, R., and P.K. Narayan. 2009. A panel data analysis of the military expenditure-external Debt Nexus: Evidence from six middle Eastern Countries. Journal of Peace Research 462: 235–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343308100717.
- Somer, M. 2004. Turkey’s Kurdish conflict: Changing context, and domestic and regional implications. The Middle East Journal 582: 235–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3751/58.2.14.
- Stoltenberg, J. 2018a. Press conference by NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg following the meeting of the North Atlantic council at the level of heads of state and government (NATO summit Brussels). NATO. July 11 2018. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_156733.htm
- Stoltenberg, J. 2018b. Remarks by NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg at a meeting with the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump. NATO. July 11 2018. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_156854.htm
- Taşpınar, Ö. 2012. Turkey’s strategic vision and Syria. The Washington Quarterly 353: 127–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2012.706519.
- Topaloff, L. 2013. Bulgaria. In Strategic cultures in Europe: Security and defence policies across the continent. ed. H. Biehl, B. Giegerich and A. Jonas, 43–54. Potsdam: Springer.
- Triantaphyllou, D. 2007. Energy security and Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP): The Wider Black Sea area context. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 72: 289–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850701402227.
- Triantaphyllou, D. 2009. Preface. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 93: 223–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902934127.
- Trump, D. 2017. Remarks by President Trump at NATO unveiling of the article 5 and Berlin Wall memorials - Brussels, Belgium. The White House. May 25 2017 https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-nato-unveiling-article-5-berlin-wall-memorials-brussels-belgium
- Tsantoulis, Y. 2009. Geopolitics, (Sub)Regionalism, discourse and a troubled ‘Power Triangle’ in the Black Sea. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 93: 243–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902934168.
- Tudoroiu, T. 2012. The European Union, Russia, and the future of the transnistrian frozen conflict. East European Politics and Societies 261: 135–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325411404885.
- Turnock, D. 2001. Romania: Contemporary geopolitical perspectives. Geopolitics 61: 119–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040108407710.
- US Defense Security Cooperation Agency. 2017. Romania | the official home of the defense security cooperation agency. https://www.dsca.mil/tags/romania
- Ustun, C. 2010. Europeanization of foreign policy: The case of Turkish foreign policy towards the Black Sea Region. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 102: 225–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2010.486949.
- Verdun, A., and G.E. Chira. 2008. From neighbourhood to membership: Moldova’s Persuasion strategy towards the EU. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 84: 431–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850802556418.
- Walt, S.M. 1985. Alliance formation and the balance of world power. International Security 94: 3–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2538540.
- Weaver, C. 2011. Black Sea regional security: Present multipolarity and future possibilities. European Security 201: 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2010.510517.
- Weber, Y. 2017. Russian foreign policy in the Middle East: Multiple drivers, uncertain outcomes. Foreign Policy Research Institute, November, 7
- Wilson, A., and N. Popescu. 2009. Russian and European neighbourhood policies compared. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 93: 317–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850902934317.
- Winrow, G. 2007. Geopolitics and energy security in the Wider Black Sea Region. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 72: 217–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14683850701402060.
- World Bank. 2019. World Development Indicators (WDI) data catalog. https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators
- Yilmaz, I., and J. Barry. 2018. Instrumentalizing Islam in a ‘Secular’ State: Turkey’s Diyanet and interfaith dialogue. Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2018.1506301.
- Zaitseva, L., and F. Steinhausler. 2014. Nuclear trafficking issues in the Black Sea Region. EU Non-Proliferation Consortium Non-Proliferation Papers 39: 24.
- Zyla, B. 2019. Eclecticism and the future of the burden-sharing research programme: Why Trump is wrong. International Political Science Review August DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119863132.