References
- Aggestam, K. F. Cristiano, and L. Strömbom. 2015. “Towards agonistic peacebuilding? exploring the antagonism–agonism nexus in the middle east peace process.” Third World Quarterly 36 (9): 1736–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1044961.
- Al-Jazeera. 2015. Öcalan’ın mektubunun tam metni [The full text of Öcalan’s letter]. 21 March. http://www.aljazeera.com.tr/haber/ocalanin-mektubunun-tam-metni
- Alpkaya, G. I. Altıntas, Ö. Sevdiren, and E.A. Sevimli. 2013. Enforced disappearances and the conduct of the judiciary. Istanbul: Hafiza Merkezi. https://hakikatadalethafiza.org/en/kaynak/enforced-disappearances-and-the-conduct-of-the-judiciary/
- Andrews, P.A. 1992. Türkiye’de etnik gruplar [Ethnic groups in Turkey]. Istanbul: Ant Yayınları.
- Ayata, B. and S. Hakyemez. 2013. “The AKP’s engagement with Turkey’s past crimes: An analysis of PM Erdoğan’s ‘Dersim apology.” Dialectical Anthropology 37 (1): 131–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-013-9304-3.
- Barsalou, J., and V. Baxter. 2007. “The urge to remember: The role of memorials in social reconstruction and transitional justice.” USIP Stabilization and Reconstruction Series 5, 1–24. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/srs5.pdf
- Bar-Tal, D. 2000. “From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis.” Political Psychology 21 (2): 351–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00192.
- Bashir, B. 2009. “Accommodating historically oppressed social groups: Deliberative democracy and the politics of reconciliation.” In The politics of reconciliation in multicultural societies, ed. W. Kymlicka and B. Bashir, 48–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bashir, B. and W. Kymlicka. 2009. “Introduction: Struggles for inclusion and reconciliation in modern democracies.” In The politics of reconciliation in multicultural societies, ed. W. Kymlicka and B. Bashir, 1–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bilali, R., A.B. Çelik, and E. Ok. 2014. “Psychological asymmetry in minority-majority relations at different stages of ethnic conflict.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations 43 (B): 253–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2014.09.002.
- BİLGESAM. 2013. Çözüm sürecine toplumsal bakış. Ankara: BİLGESAM Yayınları.
- Bohman, J. 1998. “Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4): 400–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00061.
- Budak, Y. 2015. “Dealing with the past: Transitional justice, ongoing conflict and the Kurdish issue in Turkey.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 9 (2): 219–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijv002.
- Çelenk, T. 2020. Öteki ile uzlaşmanın yolculuğu: ‘Ekopolitik’. Istanbul: KDY.
- Celep, Ö. 2018. “The moderation of Turkey’s Kurdish left: The Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP).” Turkish Studies 19 (5): 723–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2018.1483195.
- Çelik, A.B. 2012. “Ethnopolitical conflict in Turkey: From the denial of Kurds to peaceful co-existence?” In Handbook of ethnic conflict. International Perspectives, ed. D. Landis and R.D. Albert, 241–60. New York: Springer.
- Çelik, A.B. 2015. “The Kurdish issue and levels of ontological security.” In Conflict resolution and ontological security: Peace anxieties, ed. B. Rumelili, 52–70. New York: Routledge.
- Çelik, A.B. 2017. “Gendered aspects of conflict, displacement and peace process in Turkey.” International Migration 55 (5): 136–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12255.
- Çelik, A.B., and E. Balta. 2020. “Explaining the micro dynamics of the populist cleavage in the ‘new Turkey’.” Mediterranean Politics 25 (2): 160–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2018.1507338.
- Cumhuriyet. 2011. “Dersim için Özür Diliyorum.” http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/diger/300058/_Dersim_icin_ozur_diliyorum_.html
- Daşlı, G. 2015. “Hakikatin ortaya çıkarılmasında toplumsal mücadele alanı: Toplu mezarlar.” http://www.demos.org.tr/hakikatin-ortaya-cikarilmasinda-bir-toplumsal-mucadele-alani-toplu-mezarlar/
- Demirkol, M. 2016. “Başarısız bir anayasa yapım süreci: TBMM Meclis Anayasa Yapım Komisyonu’na dair bir değerlendirme.” Balkan Journal of Social Sciences December 1–12. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/670026.
- Dryzek, J.S. 2005. “Democracy in divided societies: Alternatives to agonism and analgesia.” Political Theory 33 (2): 218–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704268372.
- Efe, I. and B. Forchtner. 2015. “Saying ‘sorry’ in Turkey: The Dersim massacre of the 1930s in 2011.” Journal of Language and Politics 14 (2): 233–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.2.03efe.
- Ekopolitik. 2009. Türkiye’nin büyük çatışı: Meçhul, mezkur mesele. https://hakikatadalethafiza.org/kaynak/turkiyenin-buyuk-catisi-mezkur-mechul-mesele-ekopolitik/
- Gibson, J.L. and A. Gouws. 1999. “Truth and reconciliation in South Africa: Attributions of blame and the struggle over Apartheid.” American Political Science Review 93: 501–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2585571.
- Gunter, M. 2012. “The closing of Turkey’s Kurdish opening.” Journal of International Affairs 20 September. https://mepc.org/reopening-turkeys-closed-kurdish-opening
- Gutmann, A. and D. Thompson. 1996. Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Hafıza Merkezi Website. https://hakikatadalethafiza.org/turkiyede-zorla-kaybetmeler-ve-cezasizliga-dair-temel-bilgiler/turkiyede-zorla-kaybetmeler/
- Halkların Demokratik Kongresi. 2013. Demokrasi ve barış konferansı sonuç bildirgesi, 25-26 May 2013 Ankara. https://www.halklarindemokratikkongresi.net/hdk/hdk-diyor-ki/demokrasi-ve-baris-konferansi-sonuc-bildirgesi-25-26-mayis-2013-ankara/428
- Hirsch, A.K. 2012. “Introduction: The agon of reconciliation.” In Theorizing post-conflict reconciliation: Agonism, restitution and repair, ed. A.K. Hirsch, 1–10. London: Routledge.
- Kaliber, A. and N. Tocci. 2010. “Conflict society and the transformation of Turkey’s Kurdish question.” Security Dialogue 41 (2): 191–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610361890.
- Kayhan Pusane, Ö. 2014. “Turkey’s Kurdish opening: Long awaited achievements and failed expectations.” Turkish Studies 15 (1): 81–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2014.891348.
- Kriesberg, L. 2001. “Changing forms of coexistence.” In Reconciliation, Justice and Coexistence: Theory and Practice, ed. M. Abu-Nimer, 47–64. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.
- Kurban, D. D. Yükseker, A.B. Çelik, T. Ünalan, and A. Tamer Aker. 2007. Confronting forced migration: Post-displacement restitution of citizenship rights in Turkey. Istanbul: TESEV.
- Lederach, J.P. 1998. Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.
- Maddison, S. 2014. “Relational formation and agonistic dialogue in divided societies.” Political Studies 63 (5): 1014–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12149.
- Maddison, S. and R. Diprose. 2018. “Conflict dynamics and agonistic dialogue on historical violence: A case from Indonesia.” Third World Quarterly 39 (8): 1622–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1374837.
- Milliyet. 2015. PKK özür diledi ama. https://www.milliyet.com.tr/gundem/pkk-ozur-diledi-ama-2117771
- Mouffe, C. 2000. The democratic paradox. London: Verso Books.
- Muldoon, P. 2003. “Reconciliation and political legitimacy: The old Australia and the new South Africa.” Australian Journal of Politics and History 49 (2): 194–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8497.00303.
- Mynet. 2011. Erdoğan’ı zora sokacak konuşma. http://www.mynet.com/haber/guncel/erdogani-zora-sokacak-konusma-591874-1
- Nagel, J. 2014. “From the politics of antagonistic recognition to agonistic peacebuilding: An exploration of symbols and rituals in divided societies.” Peace & Change: A Journal of Peace Research 39 (4): 468–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pech.12090.
- Oran, B. 2014. Kürt barışında batı cephesi: Ben Ege’de akilken. Istanbul: Iletişim.
- Özpek, B.B. 2018. The peace process between Turkey and Kurds: Anatomy of a failure. New York: Routledge.
- Rouhana, N.N. 2004. “Group identity and power asymmetry in reconciliation processes: The Israeli–Palestinian case.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 10 (1): 33–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327949pac1001_3.
- Rumelili, B. and A.B. Çelik. 2017. “Ontological insecurity in asymmetric Conflicts: Reflections on agonistic peace in Turkey’s Kurdish issue.” Security Dialogue 48 (4): 279–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010617695715.
- Saraçoğlu, C. 2009. “Exclusive recognition: The new dimensions of the question of ethnicity and nationalism in Turkey.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 32: 640–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870802065226.
- Saunders, H.H. 2001. A public peace process: Sustained dialogue to transform racial and ethnic conflicts. New York: Palgrave.
- Schaap, A. 2006. “Agonism in divided societies.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 32 (2): 255–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453706061095.
- Schirch, L. 2004. The little book of strategic peacebuilding. Intercourse PA: Good Books.
- Somer, M. 2008. “Why aren’t Kurds like the Scots and the Turks like the Brits? Moderation and democracy in the Kurdish Question.” Cooperation and Conflict 43 (2): 220–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836708089083.
- Somer, M. 2015. Milada dönüş: Ulus-devletten devlet-ulusa Türk ve Kürt meselesinin üç ikilemi. Istanbul: Koç University Press.
- Somer, M. and E. Liaras. 2010. “Turkey’s new Kurdish opening: Religious versus secular values.” Middle East Policy 17 (2): 152–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4967.2010.00445.x.
- T24. 2011. Erdoğan: Nabza göre şerbet vermiyoruz Kırıkkale. https://t24.com.tr/haber/erdogan-nabza-gore-serbet-vermiyoruz-kirikkaleaa,147162
- Tavuchis, N. 1991. Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Tekdemir, Ö. 2016. “Conflict and reconciliation between Turks and Kurds: The HDP as an agonistic actor.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16 (4): 651–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1246521.
- TESEV. 2011. Tesev anayasa komisyonu raporu: Türkiye’nin yeni anayasasına doğru. https://www.tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/rapor_Turkiyenin_Yeni_Anayasasina_Dogru.pdf
- TRTHaber. 2018. Terörle mücadelenin en önemli unsurları: Güvenlik korucuları. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/gundem/terorle-mucadelenin-en-onemli-unsurlari-guvenlik-koruculari-398859.html
- UKAM. 2014. Akil insanlar heyet raporları. Istanbul: UKAM Yayınları.
- Verdeja, E. 2012. “The elements of political reconciliation.” In Theorizing Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Agonism, Restitution and Repair, ed. A.K. Hirsch, 166–81. London: Routledge.
- Weaver, O. 1998. “Security, insecurity and asecurity in the West European non-war community.” In Security Communities, ed. E. Adler and M. Barnett, 69–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Yavuz, M.H. and N.A. Özcan. 2015. “Turkish democracy and the Kurdish question.” Middle East Policy 22 (4): 73–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12159.
- Yılmaz, H. 2014. Türkiye’de kimlikler, Kürt sorunu ve çözüm süreci: Algılar ve tutumlar. http://hakanyilmaz.info/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/OSI_Yurttaslik_2014_Cozum_Sureci_Sunum_Basin_v08.259182726.pdf
- Young, I.M. 2002. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.