References
- Adler-Nissen, R. 2017. Are We ‘Lazy Greeks’ or ‘Nazi Germans’? In Negotiating International Hierarchies in the Euro Crisis In Hierarchies in World Politics, ed. A. Zarakol, 198–219. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Aktürk, Ş. 2006. Turkish–Russian Relations after the Cold War (1992–2002). Turkish Studies 7, no. 3: 337–64. doi:10.1080/14683840600891034.
- Altfeld, M.F. 1984. The Decision to Ally: A Theory and Test. The Western Political Quarterly 37, no. 4: 523–44. doi:10.1177/106591298403700402.
- Aslan, M. 2019. ABD’nin Yaptırım Programları Kapsamında CAATSA: Türkiye’nin Durumu. İRAM: İran Araştırmaları Merkezi.
- Aydın, M., 2020. Beklenen Yaptırım Geldi; Şimdi Ne Olacak? Panorama, https://www.uikpanorama.com/blog/2020/12/15/beklenen-yaptirim-geldi-simdi-ne-olacak (accessed January 2, 2021).
- Baev, P.K., and K. Kirişçi. 2017. An Ambiguous Partnership: The Serpentine Trjacetory of Turkish-Russian Relations in the Era of Erdoğan and Putin. Brookings. September, https://www.brookings.edu/research/an-ambiguous-partnership-the-serpentine-trajectory-of-turkish-russian-relations-in-the-era-of-erdogan-and-putin/ (accessed September 27, 2020).
- Bağcı, H.Ç.K., and Ç. Kurç. 2017. Turkey’s strategic choice: Buy or make weapons? Defence Studies 17, no. 1: 38–62. doi:10.1080/14702436.2016.1262742.
- Balcı, A., 2018. Türk-Amerikan İlişkilerinde Kriz: Neden, nasıl ve nereye? Anadolu Ajansı. December 6, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/analiz-haber (accessed December 20, 2020).
- Balcı, A. 2019a. A Three-level Analysis of Turkey’s Crisis with the U.S.-led Order. Insight Turkey 21, no. 4: 13–24.
- Balcı, A. 2019b. When Hierarchy Shattered: Turkey’s post-2013 Crisis with the US-led Order. TUBITAK Project. 1002, no. 118K413. 1–30 .
- Balcı, A., and A. Hazar. 2021. Turkey in the UN security council during the cold war: elections, voting motivations and alliance commitments. Middle Eastern Studies 57, no. 2: 279–91.
- Balta, E. 2019. From geopolitical competition to strategic partnership: Turkey and Russia after the cold war. Uluslararası İlişkiler 16, no. 63: 69–86.
- Barder, A. 2015. Empire Within: International Hierarchy and its Imperial Laboratories of Governance. New York: Routledge.
- Barnathann, G.P. 2012. Western Europe, NATO, and The United States: Leash Slipping. In Not Leash Cutting In Beyond Great Powers and Hegemons: Why Secondary States Support, Follow, or Challenge, ed. K. Williams, S. Lobell, and N.J. Stanford, 112–27. CA: Stanford University Press.
- BBC News Türkçe. 2019a. ABD’den Türkiye’ye yaptırım: Trump yönetiminin amacı ve stratejisi ne?. London. October 15.
- BBC News Türkçe. 2019b. The United States would sell 100 F-35s in total to Turkey. November 27, https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-41239094 (accessed February 2, 2021).
- BBC News Türkçe. 2019c. S-400: ABD’nin karşı çıktığı, Ankara’nın ‘kullanılacak’ dediği füze savunma sistemi. November 27, https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-41239094 (accessed January 11, 2021).
- Bloomberg HT. 2021. ABD Büyükelçisinden Türkiye’ye S-400ʹden Vazgeçme Çağrısı. March 19, https://www.bloomberght.com/abd-buyukelcisi-nden-turkiye-ye-s-400-den-vazgecme-cagrisi-2277017 (accessed April 11, 2021).
- Colgan, J.D., and E.R. Lucas. 2017. Revolutionary Pathways: Leaders and the International Impacts of Domestic Revolutions. International Interactions 43, no. 3: 480–506.
- Colgan, J.D., and N.L. Miller. 2019. Rival Hierarchies and the Origins of Nuclear Technology Sharing. International Studies Quarterly 63, no. 2: 310–21.
- Cooley, A. 2012. Great Games, Local Rules: The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Cooley, A., and D. Nexon. 2020a. (No) Exit from liberalism? New Perspectives 28, no. 3: 280–91.
- Cooley, A., and D. Nexon. 2020b. Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Cumhuriyet. 2020. Libya tezkeresi Kabul edildi. January 2.
- Destradi, S. 2010. Regional powers and their strategies: Empire, hegemony, and leadership. Review of International Studies 36: 918–19.
- Donnelly, J. 2017. Beyond H‘erarchy . In Hierarchies in World Politics. ed. A. Zarakol 243–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Egeli, S. 2019. Making sense of turkey’s air and missile defense merry-go-round. All Azimuth 8: 69–92.
- Flanagan, S.J. 2013. The Turkey–Russia–Iran Nexus: Eurasian Power Dynamics. The Washington Quarterly 36, no. 1: 163–78.
- Flathman, R.E. 1980. The Practice of Political Authority: Authority and the Authoritative. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Foot, R. 2019. Remembering the past to secure the present: Versailles legacies in a resurgent China. International Affairs 95, no. 1: 143–60.
- Gilpin, R. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Goh, E. 2013. The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy, and Transition in post-Cold War East Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Goh, E. 2019. Contesting Hegemonic Order: China in East Asia. Security Studies 28, no. 3: 614–44.
- He, K. 2012. Undermining adversaries: unipolarity, threat perception, and negative balancing strategies after the cold war. Security Studies 21, no. 2: 154–91.
- Hill, F., and O. Taspinar. 2006. Turkey and Russia: Axis of the excluded? Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 48, no. 1: 81–92.
- Hinnebusch, R. 2006. The Iraq War and International Relations: Implications for Small States. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19, no. 3: 451–63.
- Hinnebusch, R. 2011. The Middle East in the world hierarchy: imperialism and resistance. Journal of International Relations and Development 4, no. 2: 213–46.
- Hurrell, A. 2006. Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order: What Space for Would-Be Great Powers? International Affairs 82, no. 1: 1–19.
- Ikenberry, G.J., and C.A. Kupchan. 1990. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization 44, no. 3: 283–315.
- İleri, K., 2020a. ABD’den Türkiye’ye S-400 Yaptırım Kararı. Anadolu Ajansı. December 14, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/abdden-turkiyeye-s-400-yaptirim-karari-/2076666 (accessed December 19, 2020).
- İleri, K., 2020b. Türk-Amerikan ilişkilerinde yeni perde: CAATSA yaptırımları. Anadolu Ajansı. December 15, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/analiz/turk-amerikan-iliskilerinde-yeni-perde-caatsa-yaptirimlari/2077178 (accessed January 13, 2021).
- İnat, K., and B. Duran. 2019. Iran Yaptırımları: Hukuksal Boyut, Bölgesel ve Küresel Yansımalar, Türkiye’ye Etkileri. İstanbul: Seta Yayınları.
- Kang, D.C. 2004. The Theoretical Roots of Hierarchy in International Relations. Australian Journal of International Affairs 58, no. 3: 337–52.
- Kaplan, E., and M. Tosun. 2020. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: ABD’nin CAATSA Kararı Egemenlik Haklarımıza Aleni Bir Saldırıdır. Anadolu Ajansı. December 16, https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/turkiye/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-abdnin-caatsa-karari-egemenlikhaklarimiza-aleni-bir-saldiridir/2078759 (accessed December 20, 2021).
- Krasner, S.D. 1999a. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Krasner, S.D. 1999b. The whole in the hole: sovereignty, shared sovereignty, and international law. Michigan Journal of International Law 25, no. 4: 1075–101.
- Krasner, S.D. 2001. Rethinking the sovereign state model. Review of International Studies 27, no. 5: 17–42.
- Kupchan, C. 2014. The normative foundations of hegemony and the challenge coming to pax Americana. Security Studies 23: 219–57.
- Kutlay, M., and Z. Ön‘ş. 2021a. Understanding oscillations in Turkish foreign policy: pathways to unusual middle power activism. Third World Quarterly 42, no. 12: 3051–69.
- Kutlay, M., and Z. Öniş. 2021b. Turkish foreign policy in a post-western order: Strategic autonomy or new forms of dependence? International Affairs 97, no. 4: 1085–104.
- Lake, D.A. 1996. Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations. International Organization 50, no. 1: 1–33.
- Lake, D.A. 1999. Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in its Century. NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Lake, D.A. 2006. Hierarchy in International Relations: Authority, Sovereignty, and the New Structure of World Politics. Paper Read at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago.
- Lake, D.A. 2009a. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
- Lake, D.A. 2009b. Relational authority and legitimacy in international relations. American Behavioral Scientist 53, no. 3: 331–53.
- Lake, D.A. 2009c. Regional Hierarchy: Authority and Local International Order. Review of International Studies 35, no. 1: 35–58.
- Lake, D.A 2013. Authority, coercion and power in international relations, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3df3/7b90b975ef6be41fef4a81da5ef967b4b1f2.pdf (accessed November 19, 2020).
- Lake, D.A. 2017. Domination, authority, and the forms of Chinese power. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 10, no. 4: 357–82.
- Larrabee, S.F. 2010. Turkey’s New geopolitics. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 52, no. 2: 157–80.
- Larson, D.W, and A. Shevchenko. 2010. Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian responses to US primacy. International Security 34, no. 4: 63–95.
- McDonald, P.K. 2017. Embedded authority: a relational network approach to hierarchy in world politics. Review of International Studies 44, no. 1: 128–50.
- Milliyet. 2020. Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’dan ABD’nin Yaptırım Kararına Sert Tepki. February 16.
- Morrow, J.D. 1991. Alliances and asymmetry: an alternative to the capability aggregation model of alliances. American Journal of Political Science 35: 904–33.
- Morrow, J.D. 1993. Arms Versus Allies: Trade-offs in the Search for Security. International Organization 47, no. 2: 207–33.
- Nieman, M.D. 2016. The return on social bonds: social hierarchy and international conflict. Journal of Peace Research 53, no. 5: 665–67.
- Oğuzlu, T. 2020. Türkiye’nin Stratejik Otonomi Arayışı ve Batı. December 22, https://fikirturu.com/jeo-strateji/turkiyenin-stratejik-otonomi-arayisi-ve-bati/ (accessed January 3, 2021).
- Ön‘ş, Z., and Ş. Yılmaz. 2009. Between europeanization and euro‐asianism: foreign policy activism in turkey during the akp era. Turkish Studies 10, no. 1: 7–24.
- Öniş, Z., and Ş. Yılmaz. 2009. Between Europeanization and Euro‐Asianism: foreign policy activism in Turkey during the AKP Era. Turkish Studies 10, no. 1: 7–24.
- Öniş, Z., and M. Yalikun. 2021. Emerging Partnership in a post-Western world? The Political Economy of China-Turkey Relations. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 21, no. 4: 507–29.
- Özdemir, Ö. 2020. ABD’nin Türkiye’ye CAATSA yaptırımları: Savunma sanayisinde üretim ve ihracat olumsuz etkilenebilir. BBC Türkçe. December 17
- Özer, V. 2019. ABD Neden Karşı. Milliyet. 7 December 2021. 15June. http://www.m‘ll‘yet.com.tr/yazarlar/verda-ozer/abd-neden-kars‘28889685
- Pape, R.A. 2005. Soft Balancing Against the United States. International Security 30, no. 1: 7–45.
- Paul, T.V. 2005. Soft Balancing in the Age of US Primacy. International Security 30, no. 1: 46–71.
- Salık, N. 2020. Türkiye-Libya Anlaşmalarının ABD’deki Yansımaları. Kriter 4, no. 42. https://kriterdergi.com/dosya-turkiyenin-libya-hamlesi/turkiye-libya-anlasmalarinin-abddeki-yansimalari accessed February 13, 2022
- Scholvin, S. 2017. Secondary Powers vis-à-vis South Africa: Hard Balancing, Soft Balancing, Rejection of Followership, and Disregard of Leadership. GIGA Working Papers, no. 306: 106–11.
- Taş Yetim, H. 2021. Türkiye’nin Amerikan Hiyerarşik Düzeni ile Krizi (1964-75): Dış Politikada Otonomi Arayışı. PhD diss., Sakarya Univ.
- Taş Yetim, H., and A. Balcı. 2021. Tabi Devletler Neden Otonomi Arttırmaya Yönelir? 1964-1975 Dönemi Türk-Amerikan İlişkilerindeki Krizi Açıklamak. Gazi Akademik Bakış Dergisi 14, no. 29: 197–220.
- Tekin, A., and P.A. Williams. 2009. EU–Russian Relations and Turkey’s Role as an Energy Corridor. Europe-Asia Studies 61, no. 2: 337–56.
- Voeten, E. 2004. Resisting the lonely superpower: responses of states in the united nations to US Dominance. The Journal of Politics 66, no. 3: 729–54.
- Walt, S.M. 1997. Why Alliances Endure or Collapse. Survival Spring 39, no. 1: 156–79.
- Walt, S.M. 2009. Alliances in a Unipolar World. World Politics 61, no. 1: 87–120.
- Waltz, K.N. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Waltz, K.N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. MA: Addison-Wesley.
- The Washington Post. 2018. Amid spat with Trump, here are Turkey’s other friends. August 13, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2018/08/13/amid-spat-with-trump-here-are-turkeys-other-friends/ (accessed February 20, 2022).
- The Washington Post. 2021. Turkey will drive a hard bargain. Here’s how the Biden team can react. January 28, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/01/28/turkey-plans-play-hardball-heres-how-biden-team-should-react/ (accessed February 20, 2022).
- Williams, K.P. 2012. Romania’s Resistance To USSR In Beyond Great Powers and Hegemons: Why Secondary States Support, Follow, or Challenge. ed. K. Williams, S. Lobell, and N.J. Stanford. CA: Stanford University Press.
- Winrow, G.M. 2009. Turkey, Russia and the Caucasus: Common and diverging interests. London: Chatham House.
- Wohlforth, W.C. 2009. Unipolarity, Status, Competition, and Great Power War. World Politics 61, no. 1: 28–57.
- Yarhi-milo, K., A. Lanoszka, and Z. Cooper. 2016. To Arm or to Ally? The Patron’s Dilemma and the Strategic Logic of Arms Transfers and Alliances. International Security 41, no. 2: 90–139.
- Yeni Şafak. 2020. Erdoğan: Egemenlik Hakkımıza Aleni. December 17.
- Yeni Şafak. 2021. ABD’den gerilimi tırmandıracak çıkış: Türkiye Libya’dan çıksın. January 29.
- Yeşiltaş, M. 2020. Savunma Sanayiinde Özgürleşme. SETA. December 19, https://www.setav.org/savunma-sanayiinde-ozgurlesme/ (accessed December 12, 2021).