Structural bias, polarized mediation and conflict resolution failure: a comparative examination of the disputes in Transnistria and Donbas

References

• BBC. 2020. “Moldova’s new president calls for Russian troops to withdraw.” November 30. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-55135213 accessed July 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Beber, B. 2012. “International mediation, selection effects, and the question of Bias.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 29, no. 4: 397–424. doi:10.1177/0738894212449091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitch, J., and A. Houston. 2000. “Why do they do it like this? an analysis of the factors influencing mediation behavior in international conflicts.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 44, no. 2: 170–202. doi:10.1177/0022002700044002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bercovitch, J., and L. Simpson. 2010. “International mediation and the question of failed peace agreements: improving conflict management and implementation.” Peace & Change 35: 68–103. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0130.2009.00613.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bukkvoll, T. 2016. “Russian special operations forces in crimea and donbas.” Parameters 46, no. 2: 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. 1997. Negotiating across Cultures: International Communication In An. Interdependent World. Washington D.C: United States Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Waal, Thomas, and N. von Twickel. 2020. Beyond Frozen Conflict: Scenarios for the Separatist Disputes of Eastern Europe. London: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. 1973. “The resolution of conflict: constructive and destructive processes.” American Behavioral Scientist 17, no. 2: 248–248. doi:10.1177/000276427301700206.
   Google Scholar
• Dodon, I., 2020. “Special edition with the Moldovan president.” December 23. https://www.facebook.com/dodon.igor1/videos/849886925772903/ accessed July 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Favretto, K. 2009. “Should peacemakers take sides? Major power mediation, Coercion, and Bias.” American Political Science Review 103, no. 2: 248–63. doi:10.1017/S0003055409090236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearon, J.D. 1995. “Rationalist explanations for war.” International Organization 49, no. 3: 379–414. doi:10.1017/S0020818300033324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.J., and L. Keashly. 1991. “The potential complementarity of mediation and consultation within a contingency model of third party intervention.” Journal of Peace Research 28, no. 1: 29–42. doi:10.1177/0022343391028001005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.J. 2001. “Cyprus: The failure of mediation and the escalation of an identity-based conflict to an adversarial impasse.” Journal of Peace Research 38, no. 3: 307–26. doi:10.1177/0022343301038003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruntașu, Iulian. 2002. O Istorie Etnopolitică a Basarabiei 1812-2002. Chișinău: Cartier.
   Google Scholar
• George, A., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits, A., and M. Bader. 2016. “Russian patronage over Abkhazia and South Ossetia: implications for conflict resolution.” East European Politics 32, no. 3: 297–313. doi:10.1080/21599165.2016.1166104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, E. 2018. “Who supported separatism in Donbas? Ethnicity and popular opinion at the start of the Ukraine crisis.” Post-Soviet Affairs 34, no. 2–3: 158–78. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2018.1447769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoriadis, I. 2017. “Cyprus negotiations thwarted by issues on security and guarantees: How can the peace process be revived?” SWP Comments, July 2017. https://www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/cyprus-negotiations-thwarted
   Google Scholar
• Guliyev, F., and A. Gawrich.2021. “OSCE mediation strategies in eastern Ukraine and nagorno-karabakh: A comparative analysis.” European Security online. 10.1080/09662839.2021.1900121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, T., and V. Kopeček, eds. 2020. De Facto States in Eurasia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inbar, E. 1991. “Great power mediation: The USA and the May 1983 Israeli-Lebanese Agreement.” Journal of Peace Research 28: 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, M., R. Kishi, J. Wilkenfeld, M. Gelfand, and E. Salmon. 2014. “Cultural influences on mediation in international crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58, no. 4: 685–712. doi:10.1177/0022002713478565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Republican Institute . 2020. Kyiv: Center for Insights and Survey Research. https://www.iri.org/wp-content/uploads/legacy/iri.org/2020_july_survey_of_residents_of_ukraine_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• King, C. 2001. “The benefits of ethnic War: Understanding Eurasia’s Unrecognized States.” World Politics 53, no. 4: 524–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiboer, M. 1996. “Understanding success and failure of international mediation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41: 360–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kolstø, P. 2020. “Biting the hand that feeds them? Abkhazia–Russia Client–Patron Relations.” Post-Soviet Affairs 36, no. 2: 140–58. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2020.1712987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesberg, L. 2007. Constructive Conflicts: From escalation to resolution. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzio, T., and P. D’Anieri. 2018. The Sources of Russia’s Great Power Politics. Bristol: E- International Relations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kydd, A.H. 2006. “When can mediators build trust?.” The American Political Science Review 100, no. 3: 449–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laruelle, M. 2016. “The three colours of novorossiya, or the Russian nationalist mythmaking of the Ukrainian Crisis.” Post-Soviet Affairs 32, no. 1: 55–74. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2015.1023004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavrov, S. 2019. “Vojnu My Ne Nachnem, Eto Ja Vam Obeshayu [We Will Not Start the War, I Promise You].” Komersant 175 September 26 https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4103946 accessed July 6, 2022
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D.G. 2020. “Russia as Peacebuilder? Russia’s Coercive Mediation Strategy.” In Security Insights. Garmisch Partenkirchen: George C. Marshall Center for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, D. 2000. Russian Peacekeeping Strategies in the CIS: The Cases of Moldova, Georgia and Tajikistan. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marandici, I. 2020. “Multiethnic Parastates and Nation-Building: The Case of the Transnistrian Imagined Community.” Nationalities Papers 48, no. 1: 61–82. doi:10.2017/nps.2019.69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marandici, I., and A. Lesanu. 2020. “The political economy of the post-soviet de facto States: A paired comparison of Transnistria and the donetsk people’s republic.” Problems of Post-Communism 68, no. 4: 339–51. doi:10.1080/10758216.2020.1785317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melin, M. 2011. “The impact of state relationships on if, when, and how conflict management occurs.” International Studies Quarterly 55, no. 3: 691–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (MFA). 2021. Proposal for Security Guarantees, December 8. https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/nato/1790818/?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Mykhnenko, V. 2020. “Causes and consequences of the War in Eastern Ukraine: An economic geography perspective.” Europe-Asia Studies 72, no. 3: 528–60. doi:10.1080/09668136.2019.1684447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onuch, O., and G. Sasse. 2016. “The maidan in movement: diversity and the cycles of protest.” Europe-Asia Studies 68, no. 4: 556–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opposition Platform – Za Zhizn’. 2019. A Conflict Resolution Plan for Eastern Ukraine. Official Party Website. https://zagittya.com.ua/page/mirnyj_plan/planlkoncepcija.html accessed January 22, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• PMR Supreme Soviet. 2016. Criminal Code Article 278-3 (Tiraspol:) June 29
   Google Scholar
• Podolyak, M., 2022. “Telegram post on Negotiations in Istanbul.” March 29. https://t.me/M_Podolyak/33
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2021a. “Annual Press Conference.“ http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67438/videos .December 23.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V., 2021b. “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians,” Official Website of the Kremlin, July 12. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181 accessed July 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2022. Address to the Nation, President of Russia website, February 24. http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/67843
   Google Scholar
• Rauchhaus, R. 2006. “Asymmetric Information, Mediation, and Conflict Management.” World Politics 58, no. 2: 207–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, L. 2017. “Finding a peace that lasts: Mediator leverage and the durable resolution of civil wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61, no. 7: 1401–31. doi:10.1177/0022002715611231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandu, M., 2020. “Interview for RBK.” November 30. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul3ytCK-uHo accessed July 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, M., et al. 2022. “Ukraine and Russia Explore Neutrality Plan in Peace Talks.” Financial Times, March 16. https://www.ft.com/content/7b341e46-d375-4817-be67-802b7fa77ef1
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, C.C., and J.W. Spanier. 1984. Patron-Client State Relationships: Multilateral Crises in the Nuclear Age. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, I. 2009. “Who brings which Peace?: Neutral versus biased mediation and institutional peace arrangements in civil wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53, no. 3: 446–69. doi:10.1177/0022002709332207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvan, D., and S. Majeski. 2009. U.S. Foreign Policy in Perspective: Clients, Enemies and Empire. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvers, E. 2022. “Italy Circulates 4-Point Peace Plan.” Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/russia-ukraine-latest-news-2022-05-20/card/italy-circulates-4-point-peace-plan-h2o9EfwULf6P1mwDbjdn. 20May.
   Google Scholar
• Țăranu, A., and M. Gribincea. 1989-2012. Conflictul Transnistrean: Culegere de Documente și Materiale. 2012. Chișinău: Lexon-Prim.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 2010. “The strategy of paired comparison: Toward a theory of practice.” Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 2: 230–59. doi:10.1177/0010414009350044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touval, S. 1996. “Coercive mediation on the road to Dayton.” International Negotiation 1, no. 3: 547–70. doi:10.1163/157180696X00214.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2022. “Peacekeeping Data.” March 31. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/troop-and-police-contributors accessed June 17, 2022
   Google Scholar
• Yuranets, A. 2021. “A return to the roots: what is the ‘Russian Donbas’ doctrine about.” Novaya Gazeta. 29January.
   Google Scholar
• Zartman, W., ed. 2007. Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Zelensky, V. 2019. “Presmarafon Zelenskogo: Vsi Golovni Tezi [Key Theses of Zelensky’s Press Conference].” Slovo i Dilo Analytical Portal Kyiv, October 10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcsWVkq3HWw accessed July 6, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Zhukov, Y. 2016. “Trading hard hats for combat helmets: The economics of rebellion in eastern Ukraine.” Journal of Comparative Economics 44, no. 1: 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2015.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar