Economic voting in the 2023 Turkish general election

References

• Anderson, C. 2000. Economic voting and political context: A comparative perspective. Electoral Studies 19, no. 2: 151–70. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00045-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E. 2014. Distributive politics in a multiparty system: The conditional cash transfer system in Turkey. Comparative Political Studies 47, no. 9: 1211–37. doi:10.1177/0010414013495357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E. 2021a. The economic vote in the 2018 Turkish general election. In Elections and public opinion in Turkey: Through the prism of the 2018 elections, ed. A. Çarkoglu and E. Kalaycıoglu, 122–32. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E. 2021b. Effectiveness of incumbent’s strategic communication during economic crisis under electoral authoritarianism: Evidence from Turkey. American Political Science Review 115, no. 4: 1517–23. doi:10.1017/S0003055421000587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E. 2021c. An experimental investigation of voter myopia in economic evaluations. Electoral Studies 74: 102393. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E. 2022. Economic voting during the AKP era in Turkey. In The oxford handbook of Turkish politics, ed. G.M. Tezcür, 319–40. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E., and A. Çarkoğlu. 2019. Ethnicity and religiosity-based prejudice in Turkey: Evidence from a survey experiment. International Political Science Review 40, no. 1: 58–72. doi:10.1177/0192512117696333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E., and A. Çarkoğlu. 2021. Terror attacks, issue salience, and party competence: Diagnosing shifting vote preferences in a panel study. Party Politics 27, no. 4: 755–66. doi:10.1177/1354068819890060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S.E., and D. Steinberg. 2023. Economic insecurity and voter attitudes about currency crises. Studies in Comparative International Development. doi:10.1007/s12116-023-09399-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başlevent, C., H. Kirmanoğlu, and B. Şenatalar. 2005. Empirical investigation of party preferences and economic voting in Turkey. European Journal of Political Research 44, no. 4: 547–62. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00238.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başlevent, C., H. Kirmanoğlu, and B. Şenatalar. 2009. Party preferences and economic voting in Turkey (Now that the crisis is over). Party Politics 15, no. 3: 377–91. doi:10.1177/1354068808097896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. 2008. Ideology or economic pragmatism? Profiling Turkish voters in 2007. Turkish Studies 9, no. 2: 317–44. doi:10.1080/14683840802012074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A. 2012. Economic evaluations vs. ideology: Diagnosing the sources of electoral change in Turkey, 2002–2011. Electoral Studies 31, no. 3: 513–21. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A., and S.E. Aytaç. 2015. Who gets targeted for vote-buying? Evidence from an augmented list experiment in Turkey. European Political Science Review 7, no. 4: 547–66. doi:10.1017/S1755773914000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duch, R.M., and T.R. Stevenson. 2008. The economic vote: How political and Economic institutions condition election results. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., and R. Andersen. 2006. The political conditioning of economic perceptions. The Journal of Politics 68, no. 1: 194–207. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00380.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., and M. Pickup. 2010. Reversing the causal arrow: The political conditioning ofEconomic perceptions in the 2000–2004 US presidential election cycle. The Journal of Politics 72, no. 4: 1236–51. doi:10.1017/s0022381610000654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A.S., and G.A. Huber. 2010. Partisanship, political control, and economic assessments. American Journal of Political Science 54, no. 1: 153–73. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00424.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halac, M., and S.L. Schmukler. 2004. Distributional effects of crises. Economia 5, no. 1: 1–67. doi:10.1353/eco.2005.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, A., and N. Malhotra. 2013. Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science 16, no. 1: 285–306. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, M.A. 2014. The elusive economic vote. In Comparing democracies 4: Elections and voting in a changing world, ed. L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi, and P. Norris, 112–32. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L.A. Way. 2010. Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the cold war. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M.S., and M. Stegmaier. 2000. Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3, no. 1: 183–219. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis- Beck, M.S., and M. Stegmaier. 2013. The VP- Function revisited: A survey of theLiterature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice 157, no. 3–4: 367–85. doi:10.1007/s11127-013-0086-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKuen, M.B., R.S. Erikson, and J.A. Stimson. 1992. Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the US economy. American Political Science Review 86, no. 3: 597–611. doi:10.2307/1964124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R., M.S. Lewis-Beck, and E. Belanger. 2013. Economics and elections revisited. Comparative Political Studies 46, no. 5: 551–73. doi:10.1177/0010414012463877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazifa Alizada, Rowan Cole, Lisa Gastaldi, Sandra Grahn, Sebastian Hellmeier, Palina Kolvani, Jean Lachapelle, Anna Lührmann, Seraphine F. Maerz, Shreeya Pillai, and Staffan I. Lindberg. 2021. Autocratization Turns Viral. Democracy Report 2021. University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pitel, L. 2021. Will the ailing Turkish economy bring Erdogan down? Financial Times. November 1, https://www.ft.com/content/0563fbba-9fc7-4779-a6a5-bd013293661d
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M.M. 2011. Who says ‘it’s the economy’? cross-national and cross-individualvariation in the salience of economic performance. Comparative Political Studies 44, no. 3: 284–312. doi:10.1177/0010414010384371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer, M. 2019. Turkey: The slippery slope from reformist to revolutionary polarization and democratic breakdown. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1: 42–61. doi:10.1177/0002716218818056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, J. 2023. In Turkey, an election reckoning for the rise and fall of Erdogan’s economy. Reuters. May 14, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/turkey-an-election-reckoning-rise-fall-erdogans-economy-2023-05-08/
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. 2021. Affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies 69: 102199. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeyrek, D. 2023. “Erdoğan neden kaybedecek” [Why Erdoğan will lose]. Sözcü. May 1, https://www.sozcu.com.tr/erdogan-neden-kaybedecek-wp7670331
   Google Scholar