Erosion of economic institutions in the age of democratic backsliding: an analysis of the Turkish case

References

• Acemoğlu, D., and M. Üçer 2015. The ups and downs of Turkish growth 2002–2015: Political dynamics, the European Union, and the institutional slide. NBER working paper, no. 21608. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Adolph, C. 2013. Bankers, bureaucrats, and central bank politics: The myth of neutrality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akyuz, Y. 2015. Internationalization of finance and changing vulnerabilities in emerging and developing economies. South center research papers 2015/60.
   Google Scholar
• Apaydin, F., and M.K. Çoban. 2023. The political consequences of dependent financialization: Capital flows, crisis and the Authoritarian Turn in Turkey. Review of International Political Economy 30, no. 3: 1046–72. doi:10.1080/09692290.2022.2083658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atiyas, İ. 2012. Economic institutions and institutional change in Turkey during the neoliberal era. New Perspectives on Turkey 47: 57–81. doi:10.1017/S0896634600001709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayan Musil, P. 2014. Emergence of a dominant party system after multipartyism: Theoretical implications from the case of the AKP in Turkey. South European Society and Politics 20, no. 1: 71–79. doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.968981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, U. 2019. Regional organizations and durable domestic reforms?: The NAFTA, EU and competition laws in Mexico and Turkey. Journal of European Integration 41, no. 6: 745–61. doi:10.1080/07036337.2019.1599367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın-Düzgit, S., and A. Kaliber. 2016. Encounters with Europe in an era of domestic and international turmoil: Is Turkey a Europeanising candidate country? South European Society and Politics 21, no. 1: 1–14. doi:10.1080/13608746.2016.1155282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın-Düzgit, S., M. Kutlay, and F. Keyman. 2023. How erdoğan rules through crisis. Journal of Democracy 34, no. 4: 80–93. doi:10.1353/jod.2023.a907689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakır, C., and Z. Öniş. 2010. The regulatory state and Turkish banking reforms in the age of post-washington consensus. Development and Change 41, no. 1: 77–106. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01634.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M.W., B.G. Peters, J. PIERRE, K. Yesilkagit, and S. Becker. 2021. Introduction, Populists, Democratic Backslidign and Public Administration. In Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration, 1–21. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., and J.T. Checkel. 2015. Process-Tracing: From Philosophical Roots to Best Practices. In Process-Tracing, ed. Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel, 3–37. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. 2016. On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy 27, no. 1: 5–19. doi:10.1353/jod.2016.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugra, A., and O. Savaskan. 2014. ‘New capitalism in Turkey: The relationship between politics, religion and business.’. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Çoban, M.K. 2022. Coordinating monetary policy and macroprudential policy: Bureaucratic politics, regulatory intermediary, and Bank Lobbying. Public Administration 100, no. 4: 859–75. doi:10.1111/padm.12744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çoban, M.K. 2023. The political economic sources of policy non-design, policy accumulation, and decay in policy capacity. Administration & Society 55, no. 6: 1035–65. doi:10.1177/00953997231162522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, P., M. Melo, B. Mueller, and C. Pereira. 2019. Political interference and regulatory resilience in Brazil. Regulation & Governance 13, no. 4: 540–60. doi:10.1111/rego.12274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denge ve Denetleme Agi (DDA). 2020. ‘2021’e Girerken Cumhurbaşkanlığı Hükümet Sistemi: Yasama ve Yurutme, Demokrasi Barometresi Analiz Raporu, No. 13. December 21.
   Google Scholar
• Denge ve Denetleme Ağı (DDA). 2021. 2021’e Girerken Cumhurbaşkanlığı Hükümet Sistemi: Yasama ve Yürütme. Demokrasi Barometresi, Analiz Raporu, No.13, 12/21/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Dincer, N., and B. Eichengreen. 2014. ‘Central bank transparency and independence: Updates and new measures. International Journal of Central Banking. No.34, March 2014. 10.2139/ssrn.2579544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubash, N.K., and B. Morgan, eds. 2013. ‘The rise of the regulatory state of the South.’. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekdi, B. 2021. Rekabet Oyunlari. Istanbul: Cinius Yayinlari.
   Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, L. 2016. The politicization of regulatory agencies: Between partisan influence and formal independence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26, no. 3: 507–18. doi:10.1093/jopart/muv022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esen, B., and S. Gumuscu. 2021. Why did Turkish democracy collapse? A political economy account of AKP’s authoritarianism. Party Politics 27, no. 6: 1075–91. doi:10.1177/1354068820923722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esen, B., and Ş. Gumuscu. 2023. How Erdoğan’s populism won again. Journal of Democracy 34, no. 3: 21–32. doi:10.1353/jod.2023.a900430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esen, B., and Ş. Gümüşçü. 2016. Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey. Third World Quarterly 37, no. 9: 581–606. doi:10.1080/01436597.2015.1135732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2010. ‘Turkey 2010 progress report,’ commission of the European Communities, commission staff working document. COM.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2020. ‘Turkey 2020 progress report,’ commission staff working document, Brussels, 6/10/2020 SWD (2020) 355 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). 2022. Türkiye 2022 report, commission staff working document, SWD (2022) 333 final. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Gumuscu, S. 2010. Class, status, and party: The changing face of political Islam in Turkey and Egypt. Comparative Political Studies 43, no. 7: 835–61. doi:10.1177/0010414010361341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürakar, E.C. 2016. Politics of favoritism in public procurement in Turkey: Reconfigurations of dependency networks in the AKP era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Guven, A.B. 2022. ‘Towards a new political economy of Turkish capitalism: Three worlds,’ Turkish studies. Turkish Studies 24, no. 1: 177–96. doi:10.1080/14683849.2022.2103409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatipoğlu, O., and C.E. Alper. 2009. “The conduct of monetary policy in Turkey in the pre- and post-crisis period of 2001 in comparative perspective: A case for Central Bank Independence.” In Turkey and the global economy, neo-liberal restructuring and integration in the Post-Crisis Era, ed. Z. Öniş and F. Şenses, 50–72. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kutlay, M. 2020. The politics of state capitalism in a post-liberal international order: The case of Turkey. Third World Quarterly 41, no. 4: 683–706. doi:10.1080/01436597.2019.1699400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardin, Ş. 1978. Center-periphery relations: A key to Turkish Politics? In S.N. Eisenstadt, post-traditional societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mis, N., and B. Duran. 2017. Türkiye’de siyasal sistemin dönüşümü ve cumhurbaşkanlığı sistemi. Istanbul, SETA.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2023. Annual report on competition policy developments in Turkey. DAF/COMP/AR(2022)36, 23 May 2022, directorate for financial and enterprise affairs, Competition Committee, OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. 2010. Crises and transformations in Turkish political economy. Turkish Policy Quarterly 9, no. 3: 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. 2015. Monopolising the centre: The AKP and the uncertain path of Turkish democracy. The International Spectator 50, no. 2: 22–41. doi:10.1080/03932729.2015.1015335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z., and M. Kutlay. 2020. The global political economy of right-wing populism: Deconstructing the paradox. The International Spectator 55, no. 2: 108–26. doi:10.1080/03932729.2020.1731168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orhangazi, O., and E. Yeldan. 2023a. Turkey in turbulence: Heterodoxy or a new chapter in neoliberal peripheral development? Development & Change no. 0: 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Orhangazi, O., and E. Yeldan. 2023b. “Türkiye Modeli” - 2021 ve Sonrası: Rastgele hedefler, gerçekleşmeler ve bir bilanço. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi 50 Haziran. (1): 171–94.10.60165/metusd.v50i1.1286
   Google Scholar
• Özbudun, E. 2015. Turkey’s judiciary and the drift toward competitive authoritarianism. The International Spectator 50, no. 2: 42–55. doi:10.1080/03932729.2015.1020651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozel, I. 2012. The Politics of De-delegation: Regulatory (In)dependence in Turkey. Regulation and Governance 6, no. 1: 119–29. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozel, I. 2013. Differential Europe within a nation: Europeanization of Regulation across policy areas. Journal of European Public Policy 20, no. 5: 741–59. doi:10.1080/13501763.2012.751707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özel, I. 2015a. ‘Reverting structural reforms in Turkey: Towards an illiberal economic governance?’ global Turkey in Europe. Roma: Instituto Affari Internazionali.
   Google Scholar
• Özel, I. 2015b. State-business alliances and economic development: Turkey, Mexico and North Africa. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Özel, I. 2021. Market integration and transformation of business politics: Diverging trajectories of Corporatisms in Mexico and Turkey. Socio-Economic Review 19, no. 1: 219–45. doi:10.1093/ser/mwy028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özel, I., and I. Atiyas. 2011. Regulatory diffusion in Turkey: A cross-sectoral assessment. In The political economy of regulation in Turkey, ed. T. Çetin and F. Oğuz, 51–74. New York, US: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Özel, I., and A. Unan. 2021. Decoupling trends: Drivers of agency independence in telecommunications, an analysis of high and middle-income countries. Regulation & Governance 15, no. 1: 32–62. doi:10.1111/rego.12246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özsoy-Boyunsuz, Ş. 2016. The AKP’s proposal for a “Turkish type of presidentialism” in comparative context. Turkish Studies 17, 68–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangoni, B., and M. Thatcher. 2023. National de-delegation in multi-level settings: Independent regulatory agencies in Europe. Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions 36, no. 1: 81–103. doi:10.1111/gove.12722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saatçioğlu, B. 2016. De-europeanisation in Turkey: The case of the rule of law. South European Society and Politics 21, no. 1: 123–46. doi:10.1080/13608746.2016.1147994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezen, S. 2003. Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Kurulla, Geleneksel Yapılanmadan Kopuş, Ankara, Türkiye ve Orta Doğu Amme İdaresi Enstitüsü.
   Google Scholar
• Somer, M. 2019. Turkey: The slippery slope from reformist to revolutionary polarization and democratic breakdown. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1: 42–61. doi:10.1177/0002716218818056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosay, G. 2009. Delegation and accountability: Independent regulatory agencies in Turkey. Turkish Studies 10, no. 3: 341–63. doi:10.1080/14683840903141624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, M., A.S. Sweet, and B. Rangoni. 2023. Reversing delegation? Politicization, de-delegation, and non-majoritarian institutions. Governance-An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions 36, no. 1: 5–22. doi:10.1111/gove.12709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K., and J. Mahoney. 2015. “Comparative-historical analysis in contemporary political science.” In Advances in comparative-historical analysis, J. Mahoney and K. Thelen eds. 3–36. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ufuk AKÇİĞİT Yusuf Emre AKGÜNDÜZ Seyit Mümin CILASUN Elif ÖZCAN TOK Fatih YILMAZ. 2019. Facts on business dynamism in Turkey’, the Central Bank of the Turkish Republic. Working paper No: 19/30.
   Google Scholar