On the application of a new formulation of nonlinear eddy viscosity based on anisotropy to numerical ocean models

References

• H.D.I. Abarbanel, D. Holm, J.E. Marsden, and T. Ratiu, Richardson number criterion for the nonlinear stability of three-dimensional stratified flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984), pp. 2352–2355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Boussinesq, Théorie de l’Écoulement Tourbillant, Mem. Présentés par Divers, Savants Acad. Sci. Inst. France 23 (1877), pp. 46–50.
   Google Scholar
• H. Burchard, Note on the q2l equation by Mellor and Yamada (1982), J. Phys. Oceanogr. 31 (2001), pp. 1377–1387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Burchard and H. Baumert, On the performance of a mixed layer model based on the k–ϵturbulence closure, J. Geophys. Res. 100 (1995), pp. 8523–8540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Burchard and K. Bolding, Comparative analysis of four second-moment turbulence closure models for the oceanic mixed layer, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 31 (2001), pp. 1943–1968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Burchard, K. Bolding, and M.R. Villarreal, GOTM – a general ocean turbulence model. Theory, applications and test cases, Tech. Rep. EUR 18745 EN, European Commission, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• H. Burchard, O. Peterson, and T.P. Rippeth, Comparing the performance of the Mellor–Yamada and the k – ϵtwo-equation turbulence models, J. Geophys. Res. 103(C5) (1998), pp. 10543–10554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Burchard and O. Peterson, Models of turbulence in marine environment – a comparative study of two equation turbulence models, J. Marine Syst. 21 (1999), pp. 29–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.M. Canuto, Y. Cheng, and A.M. Howard, New third order moments for the convective boundary layer, J. Atmos. Sci. 58 (2001), pp. 1169–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.J. Craft, B.E. Launder, and K. Suga, Development and application of a cubic eddy viscosity model of turbulence, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 17 (1996), pp. 108–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.J. Craft, B.E. Launder, and K. Suga, Prediction of turbulent transitional phenomena with a non-linear eddy viscosity model, Int. J. Heat and Fluid Flow 18(1) (1997), pp. 15–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.D. Craig and M.L. Banner, Modeling wave-enhanced turbulence in the ocean surface layer, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 24 (1994), pp. 2546–2559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Deleersnijder and P. Luyten, On the practical advantages of the quasi-equilibrium version of the Mellor and Yamada Level 2.5 turbulence closure applied to marine modelling, Appl. Math. Model 18 (1994), pp. 281–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.L. Denman, A time dependent model of the upper ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 3 (1973), pp. 173–184.
   Google Scholar
• H. Frey, A three-dimensional, baroclinic shelf sea circulation model – 1. The turbulence closure scheme and the one dimensional test model, Cont. Shelf Res. 11 (1991), pp. 365–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Friedrich, Simulation of the thermal stratification at the FLEX central station with a one dimensional integral model, in North Sea Dynamics, J. Sundermann and W. Lenz, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1983, pp. 396–411.
   Google Scholar
• B. Galperin, L.H. Kantha, S. Hasid, and A. Rosati, A quasi-equilibrium turbulent energy model for geophysical flows, J. Atmos. Sci. 45 (1988), pp. 55–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.B. Gatski and C.G. Speziale, On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 254 (1993), pp. 59–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Jovanovic and I. Otic, On the constitutive relation for the Reynolds stresses and the Prandtl–Kolmogorov hypothesis of effective viscosity in axisymmetric strained turbulence, J. Fluids Eng. 122 (2000), pp. 48–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.H. Kantha and C.A. Clayson, An improved mixed layer model for geophysical applications, J. Geophys. Res. 99 (1994), pp. 25235–25266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Kato and O.M. Phillips, On the penetration of a turbulent layer into stratified fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 37 (1969), pp. 643–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.N. Kolmogorov, The equations of turbulent motion in an incompressible fluid, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Seria fizicheska, VI (1--2) (1942), pp. 56–58.
   Google Scholar
• J. Kondo, Air–sea bulk transfer coefficients in diabatic conditions, Bound. Layer Meteorol. 9 (1975), pp. 91–112
   Google Scholar
• W.G. Large, J.C. McWilliams, and S.C. Doney, Oceanic vertical mixing: A review and a model with a nonlocal boundary layer parameterization, Rev. Geophys. 32 (1994), pp. 363–403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.E. Launder and D.B. Spalding, Mathematical Models of Turbulence, Academic Press, London, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• J.L. Lumley, Towards a turbulence constitutive relation, J. Fluid Mech. 41(Part 2) (1970), pp. 413–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Maity and H. Warrior, Reynolds stress anisotropy based turbulent eddy viscosity model applied to numerical ocean models, J. Fluids Eng. 133 (2011), pp. 645501–645503.
   Google Scholar
• P.J. Martin, Simulation of the mixed layer at OWS November and Papa with several models, J. Geophys. Res. 90 (1985), pp. 903–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.L. Mellor, One-Dimensional, Ocean surface layer modeling: A problem and a solution, J. Phys. Oceanogr. 31 (2001a), pp. 790–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.L. Mellor and T. Yamada, Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20(4) (1982), pp. 851–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.K. Myong and N. Kasagi, Prediction of anisotropy of the near wall turbulence with an anisotropic low-Reynolds number k – ϵturbulence model, J. Fluids Eng. 112 (1990), pp. 521–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Nisizima and A. Yoshizawa, Turbulent channel and Couette flows using an anisotropic k – ϵmodel, AIAA J. 25 (1987), pp. 414–420.
   Google Scholar
• T. Pohlman, Estimating the influence of advection during FLEX’ 76 by means of a three-dimensional shelf sea circulation model, Dtsch. Hydrogr. Z. 49 (1997), pp. 215–226.
   Google Scholar
• S.B. Pope, A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis, J. Fluid Mech. 72 (1975), pp. 331–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Prandtl, Über ein neues Formelsystem für die ausgebildete Turbulenz, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen, Mathphys. (1945), pp. 6–19.
   Google Scholar
• J.F. Price, On the scaling of stress-driven entrainment experiments, J. Fluid Mech. 90 (1979), pp. 509–529.
   Google Scholar
• R. Rubinstein and J.M. Barton, Non-linear Reynolds stress models and renormalization group, Phys. Fluids A2 (1990), pp. 1472–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.-H. Shih, J. Zhu, and J.L. Lumley, A Realizable Reynolds Stress Algebraic Equation Model, Linthicum Heights, MD: NASA Center for Aerospace Information, Technical Report TM 105993, NASA, 1 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• K.C. Soetje and K. Huber, A compilation of data on the thermal stratification at the central station in the northern North Sea during FLEX’76, ‘Meteor’ Forsch. Ergebnisse Reihe A 22 (1980), pp. 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• D.B. Spalding and D.B. Launder, Mathematical Models and Turbulence. Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College, London, 1971
   Google Scholar
• C.G. Speziale, On non-linear k – l and k – ϵmodels of turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 178 (1987), pp. 459–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Suga, Recent developments in eddy viscosity modeling of turbulence, Toyota Central R & D Labs R & D Rev. 33 (1998), pp. 39–52.
   Google Scholar
• D.B. Taulbee, An improved algebraic Reynolds stress model and corresponding nonlinear stress model, Phys. Fluids A 4(11) (1992), pp. 2555–2561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.M.M.El. Telbany and A.J. Reynolds, The Structure of Turbulent Plane Couette Flow, J. Fluids Eng. 104(3) (1982), pp. 367–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar