Large-scale turbulence modelling via α-regularisation for atmospheric simulations

References

• Roeckner E, Baeuml G, Bonaventura L, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kirchner I, Kornblueh L, Manzini E, Rhodin A, Schlese U, Schulzweida U, Tompkins A. The Atmospheric General Circulation Model ECHAM5, Part 1, Model Description. Hamburg (Germany): Max-Planck-Institute For Meteorology; 2003. ( Report 349).
   Google Scholar
• Majewski D, Liermann D, Prohl P, Ritter B, Buchhold M, Hanisch T, Paul G, Wergen W, and Baumgardner J. The operational global icosahedral– hexagonal gridpoint model GME: description and high-resolution tests. Mon Weather Rev. 2002;130:319–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foias C, Holm D, Titi E. The three-imensional viscous Camassa–Holm equations. J Dyn Differ Equ. 2002;14:1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Korn P. On degrees of freedom of certain conservative turbulence models for the Navier–Stokes equations. J Math Anal Appl. 2011;378:49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts PH, Soward AM. The Navier–Stokes-equations revisited. Geophys Astrophys Fluid Dyn. 2009;103(4):303–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soward AM, Roberts PH. On the derivation of the Navier–alpha equations from Hamilton's principle. J Fluid Mech. 2008;604:297–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm DD, Marsden JE, Ratiu T. The Euler–Poincaré equations and semi-direct products with applications to continuum theories. Adv Math. 1998;137:1–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheskidov A, Holm DD, Olson E, Titi ES. On a Leray-α model of turbulence. Proc R Soc A. 2005;461:629–649.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat HS, Fetecau RC, Marsden JE, Mohseni K, West M. Lagrangian averaging for compressible fluids. SIAM J Multiscale Model Simul. 2003;3:818–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts B, Holm D. Leray and LANS-α modelling of turbulent mixing. J Turbulence. 2006;7:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Wan H, Giorgetta M, Zangl G, Restelli M, Majewski D, Bonaventura L, Frohlich K, Reinert D, Ripodas P, Kornblueh L, Forstner J. The ICON-1.2 hydrostatic atmospheric dynamical core on triangular grids: Part 1: formulation and performance of the baseline version. Geosci Model Dev. 2013;6(3):735–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jablonowski C, Williamson DL. A baroclinic instability test case for atmospheric model dynamical core. Q J R Meteorol Soc. 2007;132:2943–2975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held I, Suarez M. A proposal for the intercomparison of the dynamical cores of atmospheric general circulation models. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 1994;75(10):1825–1830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews DG, McIntyre ME. An exact theory of nonlinear waves on a Lagrangian-mean flow. J Fluid Mech. 1978;89:609–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm DD. Fluctuation effects on 3D Lagrangian mean and Eulerian mean fluid motion. Phys D. 1999;133:216–269.
   Google Scholar
• Foias C, Holm D, Titi E. The Navier–Stokes-α model of fluid turbulence. Phys D. 2001;152:505–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried E, Gurtin M. A continuum mechanical theory for turbulence: a generalized Navier–Stokes-α equation with boundary conditions. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn. 2008;22:433–470.
   Google Scholar
• Guermond J-L, Oden JT, Prudhomme S. An interpretation of the Navier-Stokes-alpha model as a frame-indifferent Leray regularization. Phys D. 2003;177:23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebholz LG. A family of new, high order NS-α models arising from helicity correction in Leray turbulence models. J Math Anal Appl. 2008;342:246–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Foias C, Holm D, Olson E, Titi E, Wynne S. A connection between the Camassa–Holm equations and turbulent flows in channels and pipes. Phys Fluids. 1999;11(8):2343–2353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Foias C, Holm D, Olson E, Titi E, Wynne S. The Camassa–Holm equations and turbulence. Phys D. 1999;133:49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate BA. The maximum allowable time step for the shallow water alpha model and its relation to time-implicit differencing. Mon Weather Rev. 2004;132(12):2719–2731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm DD, Nadiga BT. Modeling mesoscale turbulence in the barotropic double-gyre circulation. J Phys Oceanogr. 2003;33:2355–2365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht MW, Holm DD, Petersen MR, Wingate BA. Implementation of the LANS-α turbulence model in a primitive equation ocean model. J Comput Phys. 2008;227:5691–5716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen MR, Hecht MW, Wingate BA. Efficient form of the LANS-α turbulence model in a primitive equation ocean model. J Comput Phys. 2008;227:5717–5735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht MW, Holm DD, Petersen MR, Wingate BA. The LANS-α and Leray turbulence parameterizations in primitive equation ocean modeling. J Phys A. 2008;41(34):4009–4032.
   Google Scholar
• Arakawa A, Lamb VR. Methods of computational physics 17. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1977. p. 173–265.
   Google Scholar
• Baudisch J, Bonaventura L, Iske A, Miglio E. Matrix valued radial basis functions for local vector field reconstruction: applications to computational fluid dynamic models; Milan (Italy): Politecnico di; 2006. Technical report (MOX report 75).
   Google Scholar
• Simmons AJ, Struefing R. An energy and angular momentum conserving finite-difference scheme, hybrid coordinates and medium-range weather prediction; Reading (UK): ECMWF; 1981. (Tech. Rep. 28).
   Google Scholar
• Jablonowski C. Test der Dynamik zweier globaler Wettervorhersagemodelle des Deutschen Wetterdienstes: Der Held-Suarez Test [Test of the dynamics of two global weather prediction models of the German Weather Service: The Held-Suarez test], [Diploma Thesis (Master Thesis)]. Bonn, Germany: University of Bonn; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ringler TD, Heikes RP, Randall DA. Modeling the atmospheric general circulation using a spherical geodesic grid: a new class of dynamical cores. Mon Weather Rev. 2000;128:2471–2490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar