Dynamic gradient models for the sub-grid scale stress tensor and scalar flux vector in large eddy simulation

References

• Clark RA, Ferziger JH, Reynolds WC. Evaluation of subgrid-scale models using an accurately simulated flow. J Fluid Mech. 1979;91:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Meneveau C, Katz J. On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet. J Fluid Mech. 1994;275:83–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi H, Shimomura Y. Inapplicability of the dynamic Clark model to the large eddy simulation of incompressible turbulent channel flows. Phys Fluids. 2003;15:L29–L32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard A. Large eddy simulation of chaotic convection and beyond. AIAA Paper. 1997;97:0204.
   Google Scholar
• Chumakov SG. Subgrid models for large eddy simulation: scalar flux, scalar dissipation and energy dissipation [dissertation]. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lu H, Porté-Agel F. A modulated gradient model for large-eddy simulation: application to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer. Phys Fluids. 2010;22:015109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu H, Porté-Agel F. A modulated gradient model for scalar transport in large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer. Phys Fluids. 2013;25:015110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilly DK. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys Fluids A. 1992;4(3): 633–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You D, Moin P. A dynamic global-coefficient subgrid-scale eddy-viscosity model for large-eddy simulation in complex geometries. Phys Fluids. 2007;19:065110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You D, Moin P. A dynamic global-coefficient subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent scalar transport in complex geometries. Phys Fluids. 2009;21:045109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Choi H, Park N. Dynamic global model for large eddy simulation of transient flow. Phys Fluids. 2007;19:065110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoud F, Toda HB, Cabrit O, et al. Using singular values to build a subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulations. Phys Fluids. 2011;23:085106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev. 1963;91:99–164.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoud F, Ducros F. Subgrid-scale stress modeling based on the square of the velocity gradient tensor. Flow, Turbulence Combust. 1999;62:183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreman AW. An eddy-viscosity subgrid-scale model for turbulent shear flow: algebraic theory and applications. Phys Fluids. 2004;16:3670–3681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu H, Porté-Agel F. On the development of a dynamic non-linear closure for large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer. Bound-Layer Meteorol. 2014;151:429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaisas NS, Frankel SH. A priori evaluation of large eddy simulation subgrid-scale scalar flux models in isotropic passive-scalar and anisotropic buoyancy-driven homogeneous turbulence. J Turbulence. 2014;15:88–121.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman DR, Kuhn GD. The limiting behavior of turbulence near a wall. J Fluid Mech. 1986;170:265–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekurovsky D. P3DFFT: a framework for parallel computations of Fourier transforms in three dimensions. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2012;34:192–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaisas NS, Shetty DA, Frankel SH. Large eddy simulation of thermal driven cavity: evaluation of sub-grid scale models and flow physics. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2013;56:606–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau GE, Yeoh GH, Timchenko V, et al. Application of dynamic global-coefficient subgrid-scale models to turbulent natural convection in an enclosed tall cavity. Phys Fluids. 2012;24:094105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser RD, Kim J, Mansour NN. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ = 590. Phys Fluids. 1999;11:943–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Moin P, Moser RD. Turbulent statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech. 1987;177:133–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Villalba M, del Álamo JC. Turbulence modification by stable stratification in channel flow. Phys Fluids. 2011;23:045104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamura H, Ohsaka K, Abe H, et al. DNS of turbulent heat transfer in channel flow with low to medium-high Prandtl number fluid. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 1998;19:482–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redjem-Saad L, Ould-Rouiss M, Lauriat G. Direct numberical simulation of turbulent heat transfer in pipe flows: effect of Prandtl number. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2007;28:847–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Schlatter P, Brandt L, et al. DNS of a spatially developing turbulent boundary layer with passive scalar transport. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2009;30:916–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porté-Agel F, Meneveau C, Parlange M. A scale-dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J Fluid Mech. 2000;415:261–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar