Large eddy simulation of a turbulent spray jet generated by high-pressure injection: impact of the in-nozzle flow

References

• Herrmann M, Arienti M, Soteriou M. The impact of density ratio on the liquid core dynamics of a turbulent liquid jet injected into a crossflow. J Eng Gas Turbin Power. 2011;133(16):061501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallet A, Burluka AA, Borghi R. Developement of an Eulerian model for the atomisation of a liquid jet. Atomization Spray. 2001;11:619–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesnel J, Reveillon J, Menard T, et al. Subgrid analysis of liquid jet atomization. Atomization Sprays. 2011;21(11):41–67.
   Google Scholar
• Gorokhovski M, Jouanguy J, Chtab-Desporte A. Stochastic model of the near-to-injector spray formation assisted by a high-speed coaxial gas jet. Fluid Dyn Res. 2009;41:035509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apte SV, Mahesh K, Gorokhovski M, et al. Stochastic modeling of atomizing spray in a complex swirl injector using large eddy simulation. Proc Combust Inst. 2009;32:2257–2266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bini M, Jones W. Large-eddy simulation of particle-laden turbulent flows. J Fluid Mech. 2008;614:207–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuorinen V. Les of certain droplet size effects in fuel sprays. Helsinki: Aalto University; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sander W, Weigand B. Direct numerical simulation and analysis of instability enhancing parameters in liquid sheets at moderate reynolds numbers. Phys Fluids. 2008;20(15):053301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noël E, Berlemont A, Cousin J, et al. Application of the immersed bounadry method to simulate flows inside and outside the nozzles. Heidelberg: chez iClass; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lu N, Demoulin F-X, Reveillon J, et al. Large eddy simulation of cavitation and atomization in injector flows using OpenFOAM. Bremen: chez ILASS Europe; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Befrui B, Corbinelli G, Onofrio MD, et al. GDI multi-hole injector internal flow and spray analysis. (SAE paper 2011-01-1211); 2011. Detroit, MI: Society of Automotive Engineer.
   Google Scholar
• Germano M, Piomelli U, Moin P, et al. Dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Summer Workshop; 1996. Stanford, CA: Center for Turbulence Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lilly DK, A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure model. Phys Fluids. 1992;4:633–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky J. General circulaton experiments with the primitive equations. Monthly Weather Rev. 1963;91(3):99–164.
   Google Scholar
• Apte SV, Mahesh K, Moin P, et al. Large-eddy simulation of swirling particle-laden flows in a coaxial-jet combustor. Int J Multiphase Flow. 2003;29:1311–1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosaka H, Kimura S. LES of diesel fuel spray. Kyoto: chez iClass; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj N, Rutland CJ, Chang S. Large eddy simulation modelling of spray-induced turbulence effects. Int J Engine Res. 2009;10(12):97–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue A, Som S, Senecal PK, et al. Large eddy simulation of fuel-spray under non reacting IC engine conditions. Atomization Spray. 2013;23(110):925–955.
   Google Scholar
• Boivin M, Simonin O, Squires KD. On the prediction of gas–solid flows with two-way coupling using large eddy simulation. Phys Fluids. 2000;12:2080–2090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagaut P. Large eddy simulation for incompressible flows: an introduction. New York City: Springer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerfeld M. Theoretical and experimental modelling of particulate flows. Lecture Series No. 2000-06; 2000. Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium: von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson DJ, Hoglund RF. Particle drag and heat transfer in rocket nozzles. AIAA J. 1964;2:1980–1984.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner F. Liquid jet atomization and droplet breakup modeling of non-evaporating diesel fuel sprays. (SAE Technical Paper 970050); 1997. Detroit, MA: Society of Automotive Engineer.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson GB, Nordin N, Weller HG. Particle tracking in unstructured, arbitrary polyhedral meshes for use in CFD and molecular dynamics. Commun Numer Method Eng. 2009;25:263–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loth E. Computational fluid dynamics of bubbles, drops and particles; 2016. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Rourke P, Bracco F. Modeling of drop interactions in thick sprays and a comparison with experiments. Proc Inst Mech Eng. 1980;9:101–106.
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande SS, Anumolu L, Trujillo MF. Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow. Comput Sci Discov. 2012;5:014016.
   Google Scholar
• Deshpande SS, Trujillo MF. Distinguishing features of shallow angle plunging jets. Phys. Fluids. 2013;25(18):082103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirdžić I, Lilek Ž, Perić M. A collocated finite volume method for predicting flows at all speeds. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 1993;16:1029–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinsot TJ, Lele SK. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous reacting flows. J Comput Phys. 1992;101:104–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senecal PK, Schmidt DP, Nouar I, et al. Modeling high-speed viscous liquid sheet atomization. Int J Multiphase Flow. 1999;25(6–7):1073–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavaises M, Andriotis A, Papoulias D, et al. Characterization of string cavitation in large-scale diesel nozzles with tapered holes. Phys Fluids. 2009;21:052107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope SB. Turbulent flows. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman-Roisin B. Environmental fluid mechanics. Hanover: Wiley; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MM, Helie J, Gorokhovski M, et al. Numerical analysis of multihole gasoline direct injection sprays. Heidelberg: chez iClass; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mojtabi M. Optical analysis of multi-stream GDI sprays under various engine operating conditions. Lougborough: Lougborough University; 2011.
   Google Scholar