Drag reduction in spatially developing turbulent boundary layers by spatially intermittent blowing at constant mass-flux

References

• Kasagi N, Suzuki Y, Fukagata K. Microelectromechanical systems-based feedback control of turbulence for skin friction reduction. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2009;41:231–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J. Control of turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids. 2003;15:1093–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Moin R, Moser P. Turbulent statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech. 1987;177:133–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalart PR. Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to Rθ = 1410. J Fluid Mech. 1988;187:61–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Mayor R, Jiménez J. Drag reduction by riblets. Phil Trans R Soc A. 2011;369:1412–1427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukagata K, Kern S, Chatelain P, et al. Evolutionary optimization of an anisotropic compliant surface for turbulent friction drag reduction. J Turbul. 2008;9:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H, Moin P, Kim J. Active turbulent control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows. J Fluid Mech. 1994;262:75–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Bewley T. A linear systems approach to flow control. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2007;39:383–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min T, Kang SM, Speyer S, et al. Sustained sub-laminar drag in a fully developed channel flow. J Fluid Mech. 2006;558:149–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricco P, Quadrio M. Wall-oscillation conditions for drag reduction in turbulent channel flow. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2008;29:601–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra M, Skote M. Drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers with half wave wall oscillations. Math Probl Eng. 2015;2015:253249.
   Google Scholar
• Nakanishi R, Mamori H, Fukagata K. Relaminalization of turbulent flow using traveling wave-like wall deformation. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2012;35:152–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomiyama N, Fukagata K. Direct numerical simulation of drag reduction in a turbulent channel using spanwise traveling wave-like wall deformations. Phys Fluids. 2013;25:05115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang WY, Huang WX, Xu CX, et al. Suboptimal control of wall turbulence with arrayed dimple actuators for drag reduction. J Turbul. 2016;17:379–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skote M. Scaling of the velocity profile in strongly drag reduced turbulent flows over an oscillating wall. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2014;50:352–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamiès M, Garnier E, Merlen A, et al. Response of a spatially developing turbulent budary layer to active control strategies in the frame work of opposition control. Phys Fluids. 2007;19:108102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroh A, Frohnapfel B, Schlatter P, et al. A comparison of opposition control in turbulent boundary layer and turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids. 2015;27:075101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia Q, Xuang W, Xu C, et al. Direct numerical simulation of spatially developing turbulent boudary layers with opposition control. Fluid Dyn Res. 2015;47:025503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kametani Y, Fukagata K. Direct numerical simulation of spatially developing turbulent boundary layers with uniform blowing and suction. J Fluid Mech. 2011;681:154–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marusic I, Mathis R, Hutchins N. Predictive model for wall-bounded turbulent flow. Science. 2010;329:193–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlatter P, Li Q, Örlü R, et al. On the near-wall vortical structures at moderate Reynolds numbers. Eur J Mech B-Fluid. 2014;48:75–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlatter P, Örlü R, Li Q, et al. Turbulent boundary layers up to Reθ =2500 studied through simulation and experiment. Phys Fluids. 2009;21:051702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlatter P, Örlü R. Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech. 2010;659:116–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitel-Amor G, Örlü R, Schlatter P. Simulation and validation of a spatially evolving turbulent boundary layer up to Reθ = 8300. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2014;47:57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kametani Y, Fukagata K, Örlü R, et al. Effect of uniform blowing/suction in a turbulent boundary layer at moderate Reynolds number. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2015;55:132–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornilov VI, Boiko A. Efficiency of Air microblowing through microperforated wall for flat plate drag reduction. AIAA J. 2012;50:724–732.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Kim K, Sung H. Wall pressure fluctuations in a turbulent boundary layer after blowing or suction. AIAA J. 2003;41:1697–1704.
   Google Scholar
• Fukagata K, Iwamoto K, Kasagi N. Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys Fluids. 2002;14:L73–L76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlatter P, Stolz S, Kleiser L. LES of transitional flows using approximate deconvolution model. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2004;25:549–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlatter P, Örlü R. Turbulent boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers: inflow length and tripping effects. J Fluid Mech. 2012;710:5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits AJ, Matheson N, Joubert PN. Low-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers in zero and favorable pressure gradients. J Ship Res. 1983;27:147–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukagata K, Sugiyama K, Kasagi N. On the lower bound of net driving power in controlled duct flows. Physica D. 2009;238:1082–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohnapfel B, Hasegawa Y, Quadrio M. Money versus time: evaluation of flow control in terms of energy consumption and convenience. J Fluid Mech. 2012;700:406–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naito H, Fukagata K. Control of flow around a circular cylinder for minimizing energy dissipation. Phys Rev E. 2014;90:053008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar