A turbulence characteristic length scale for compressible flows

References

• Favre A. Statistical equations of turbulent gases. Problems of hydrodynamics and continuum mechanics. Philadelphia (PA): SIAM; 1969. p, 231–266.
   Google Scholar
• Zeman O. Dilatation dissipation: the concept and application in modelling compressible mixing layers. Phys Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics. 1990;2:178–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar S, Erlebacher G, Hussaini MY, et al. The analysis and modelling of dilatational terms in compressible turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 1991;227:473–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox DC. Dilatation-dissipation corrections for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J. 1992;30(11):2639–2646.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson AV, Friedrich R, Lechner R, et al. A prediction method for high speed turbulent separated flows with experimental verification. AIAA Paper No. 98-2547, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar S. The stabilizing effect of compressibility in turbulent shear flow. J Fluid Mech. 1995;282:163–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreman AW, Sandham ND, Luo KH. Compressible mixing layer growth rate and turbulence characteristics. J Fluid Mech. 1996;320:235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamba F. Effects of pressure fluctuations on turbulence growth in compressible homogeneous shear flow. Phys Fluids (1994-present). 1999;11(6):1623–1635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantano C, Sarkar S. A study of compressibility effects in the high-speed turbulent shear layer using direct simulation. J Fluid Mech. 2002;451:329–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshizawa A, Fujiwara H, Hamba F, et al. Nonequilibrium turbulent-viscosity model for supersonic free-shear layer/wall-bounded flows. AIAA J. 2003;41(6):1029–1036.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshizawa A, Nisizima S, Shimomura Y, et al. A new methodology for Reynolds-averaged modeling based on the amalgamation of heuristic-modeling and turbulence-theory methods. Phys Fluids (1994-present). 2006;18(3):035109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Park SO. New compressible turbulence model for free and wall-bounded shear layers. J Turbulence. 2010;(11):N10.
   Google Scholar
• Kim GH, Park SO. Explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model for compressible flow turbulence. J Turbulence. 2013;14(5):35–59.
   Google Scholar
• Klifi H, Lili T. A compressibility correction of the pressure strain correlation model in turbulent flow. Comptes Rendus Mécanique. 2013;341(7):567–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez CA, Girimaji SS. Explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model (EARSM) for compressible shear flows. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn. 2014;28(2):171–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatski TB, Jongen T. Nonlinear eddy viscosity and algebraic stress models for solving complex turbulent flows. Prog Aerospace Sci. 2000;36(8):655–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu JL, Zhang Y, Bai JQ. One-equation turbulence model based on extended Bradshaw assumption. AIAA J. 2015;53:1433–1441.
   Google Scholar
• Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST Turbulence Model. Turbulence Heat Mass Transfer. 2003;4(1):625–632.
   Google Scholar
• Menter FR, Egorov Y. A scale-adaptive simulation model using two-equation models. AIAA Paper No. 2005-1095, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Menter FR. The Scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 1: theory and model description. Flow Turbulence Combust. 2010;85(5):113–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egorov Y, Menter FR, Lechner R, et al. The scale-adaptive simulation method for unsteady turbulent flow predictions. Part 2: application to complex flows. Flow Turbulence Combust. 2010;85(1):139–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu JL, Hu N, Gao G. A high-fidelity turbulence length scale for flow simulation[M]//progress in hybrid RANS-LES modelling. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 141–145.
   Google Scholar
• Xu JL, Yan C. A One-equation scale-adaptive simulation model. Phys Gases. 2010;5(1):79–82 ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Durbin PA, Reif BAP. Statistical theory and modeling for turbulent flows. New York: Wiley; 2011. p. 127–127.
   Google Scholar
• Martin MP, Piomelli U, Candler GV. Subgrid-scale models for compressible large-eddy simulations. Theoretic Comput Fluid Dyn. 2000;13(5):361–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantano C, Sarkar S. A study of compressibility effects in the high-speed turbulent shear layer using direct simulation. J Fluid Mech. 2002;451:329–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comte BG, Corrsin S. Simple Eulerian time correlation of full- and narrow-band velocity signals in grid-generated, isotropic turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 1971;48:273–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brich SF, Eggers JM. A critical review of the experimental data for developed free turbulent shear layers. NASA SP-321. 1973:11–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber MR, Dutton JC. Three-dimensional velocity field in a compressible mixing layer. AIAA J. 1993;31(11):2061–2067.
   Google Scholar
• Jones WP, Launder BE. The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1972;15:301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox DC. Reassessment of the scale determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J. 1988;26:1299–1310.
   Google Scholar
• Goebel SG, Dutton JC. Velocity measurements of compressible, turbulent mixing layers. AIAA Paper. 1990;90:0709.
   Google Scholar