Passive control of the flow around unsteady aerofoils using a self-activated deployable flap

References

• Amitay M, Horvath M, Michaux M, et al. Virtual aerodynamic shape modification at low angles of attack using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA Paper. 2001; 2975: 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Amitay M, Smith DR, Kibens V, et al. Aerodynamic flow control over an unconventional airfoil using synthetic jet actuators. AIAA J. 2001; 39: 361–370.
   Google Scholar
• Heine B, Mulleners K, Joubert G, et al. Dynamic stall control by passive disturbance generators. AIAA J. 2013; 51: 2086–2097.
   Google Scholar
• Bechert DW, Bruse M, Hage W, et al. Biological surfaces and their technological application: laboratory and flight experiments on drag reduction and separation control. AIAA Paper. 1997;1960.
   Google Scholar
• Bechert D, Bruse M, Hage W, et al. Fluid mechanics of biological surfaces and their technological application. Naturwissenschaften. 2000; 87: 157–171.
   Google Scholar
• Choi H, Park H, Sagong W, et al. Biomimetic flow control based on morphological features of living creaturesa. Phys Fluids. 2012;24(1994–present):121302.
   Google Scholar
• Aldheeb MA, Asrar W, Sulaeman E, et al. A review on aerodynamics of non-flapping bird wings. J Aerospace Technol Manage. 2016; 8: 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bramesfeld G, Maughmer MD. Experimental investigation of self-actuating, upper-surface, high-lift-enhancing effectors. J Aircraft. 2002; 39: 120–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers AC, Thomas ALR, Taylor GK. Automatic aeroelastic devices in the wings of a steppe eagle Aquila nipalensis. J Exp Biol. 2007; 210: 4136–4149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz M, Knacke T, Thiele F, et al. Separation control by self-activated movable flaps. AIAA Paper. 2004; 1243: 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Schluter JU. Lift enhancement at low Reynolds numbers using self-activated movable flaps. J Aircraft. 2010; 47: 348–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CHJ, Schluter J. Stall control with feathers: self-activated flaps on finite wings at low Reynolds numbers. C R Mech. 2012; 340: 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechert DW, Hage W, Meyer R. Self-actuating flaps on bird-and aircraft-wings. Flow phenomena in nature: inspiration, learning and applications 2 (design and nature). WIT Transactions on State-of-the-art in Science and E. 2006; 4: 435–446.
   Google Scholar
• Traub LW, Jaybush L. Experimental investigation of separation control using upper-surface spoilers. J Aircraft. 2010; 47: 714–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston JM, Gopalarathnam A, Edward J. Experimental investigation of bio-inspired high lift effectors on a 2-D airfoil. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston J, Gopalarathnam A. Investigation of a bio-inspired lift-enhancing effector on a 2D airfoil. Bioinspir Biomim. 2012; 7: 036003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruecker C, Weidner C. Influence of self-adaptive hairy flaps on the stall delay of an airfoil in ramp-up motion. J Fluids Struct. 2014; 47: 31–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernstine KH, Moore CJ, Cutler A, et al. Initial characterization of self-activated movable flaps, pop-up feathers. AIAA Paper, 2008;369.
   Google Scholar
• Altman A, Allemand G. Post-stall performance improvement through bio-inspired passive covert feathers. In: 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 2016. p. 2042.
   Google Scholar
• Liu T, Montefort J, Pantula S. Effects of flexible fin on low-frequency oscillation in post-stalled flows. AIAA J. 2010; 48: 1235–1247.
   Google Scholar
• Montefort J, Pohl N, Liu T, et al. Thin-wing vibration control using flexible fins. AIAA J. 2013; 51: 2218–2230.
   Google Scholar
• Rosti ME, Omidyeganeh M, Pinelli A. Direct numerical simulation of the flow around an aerofoil in ramp-up motion. Phys Fluids. 2016; 28: 025106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omidyeganeh M, Piomelli U. Large-eddy simulation of three-dimensional dunes in a steady, unidirectional flow. Part 1. Turbulence statistics. J Fluid Mech. 2013; 721: 454–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omidyeganeh M, Piomelli U. Large-eddy simulation of three-dimensional dunes in a steady, unidirectional flow. Part 2. Flow structures. J Fluid Mech. 2013; 734: 509–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhie CM, Chow WL. Numerical study of the turbulent flow past an airfoil with trailing edge separation. AIAA J. 1983; 21: 1525–1532.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Moin P. Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. J Comput Phys. 1985; 59: 308–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balay S, Abhyankar S, Adams M, et al. PETSc Web page. Available from: http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc
   Google Scholar
• Henson VE, Yang UM. BoomerAMG: a parallel algebraic multigrid solver and preconditioner. Appl Numer Math. 2002; 41: 155–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess JL, Smith AMO. Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary bodies. Prog Aerosp Sci. 1967; 8: 1–138.
   Google Scholar
• Wong JG, Mohebbian A, Kriegseis J, et al. Rapid flow separation for transient inflow conditions versus accelerating bodies: an investigation into their equivalency. J Fluids Struct. 2013; 40: 257–268.
   Google Scholar
• Pinelli A, Naqavi IZ, Piomelli U, et al. Immersed-boundary methods for general finite-difference and finite-volume Navier–Stokes solvers. J Comput Phys. 2010; 229: 9073–9091.
   Google Scholar
• Favier J, Revell A, Pinelli A. A lattice Boltzmann–immersed boundary method to simulate the fluid interaction with moving and slender flexible objects. J Comput Phys. 2014; 261: 145–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulleners K, Raffel M. Dynamic stall development. Exp Fluids. 2013; 54: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey WJ. The phenomenon of dynamic stall. DTIC Document, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Rosti ME, Kamps L, Bruecker C, et al. The PELskin project-part V: towards the control of the flow around aerofoils at high angle of attack using a self-activated deployable flap. Meccanica. 2016. doi:10.1007/s11012-016-0524-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt JCR, Wray AA, Moin P. Eddies, stream, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Center for turbulence research report CTR-S88. 1988. p. 193–208.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson CHK. Vortex dynamics in the cylinder wake. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 1996; 28: 477–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haller G. Distinguished material surfaces and coherent structures in three-dimensional fluid flows. Physica D. 2001; 149: 248–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadden SC, Lekien F, Marsden JE. Definition and properties of Lagrangian coherent structures from finite-time Lyapunov exponents in two-dimensional aperiodic flows. Physica D. 2005; 212: 271–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar