On the effect of an anisotropy-resolving subgrid-scale model on large eddy simulation predictions of turbulent open channel flow with wall roughness

References

• Chatzikyriakou D, Buongiorno J, Caviezel D, et al. DNS and LES of turbulent flow in a closed channel featuring a pattern of hemispherical roughness elements. Int J Heat Fluid Fl. 2015;53:29–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaganagar K, Kim J, Coleman G. Effect of roughness on wall-bounded turbulence. Flow Turbulence Combust. 2004;72:463–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamloo H, Pirzadeh B. Analysis of roughness density and flow submergence effects on turbulence flow characteristics in open channels using a large eddy simulation. Appl Math Mod. 2015;39:1074–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Uth MF, Herwig H. Structure of a turbulent flow through plane channels with smooth and rough walls: an analysis based on high resolution DNS results. Comput Fluid. 2015;107:77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchis MD, Napoli E. Effects of irregular two-dimensional and three-dimensional surface roughness in turbulent channel flows. Int J Heat Fluid Fl. 2012;36:7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson AG, Gunnar J, Hellström I, et al. Effect of spatial resolution of rough surfaces on numerically computed flow fields with application to hydraulic engineering. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mechan. 2014;8(3):373–381.
   Google Scholar
• Bailon-Cuba J, Leonardi S, Castillo L. Turbulent channel flow with 2D wedges of random height on one wall. Int J Heat Fluid Fl. 2009;30:1007–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi S, Castro IP. Channel flow over large cube roughness: a direct numerical simulation study. J Fluid Mech. 2010;651:519–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagano Y, Hattori H, Houra T. DNS of velocity and thermal fields in turbulent channel flow with transverse-rib roughness. Int J Heat Fluid Fl. 2004;25:393–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsikata JM, Tachie MF. Adverse pressure gradient turbulent flows over rough walls. Int J Heat Fluid Fl. 2013;39:127–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz MP, Flack KA. The rough-wall turbulent boundary layer from the hydraulically smooth to the fully rough regime. J Fluid Mech. 2007;580:381–405..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keirsbulck L, Mazouz A, Labraga L, et al. Influence of the surface roughness on the third-order moments of velocity fluctuations. Exp Fluids. 2001;30:592–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogstad P-Å, Antonia RA. Surface roughness effects in turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids. 1999;27:450–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky J. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. the basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev. 1963;91:99.
   Google Scholar
• Germano M, Piomelli U, Moin P, et al. A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys Fluids A. 1991;3(7):1760–1765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilly DK. A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method. Phys Fluids A. 1992;4(3):633–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang Y, Robert LS, Koseff JR. A dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model and its application to turbulent recirculating flows. Phys Fluids A. 1993;5(12):3186–3196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardina J, Ferziger JH, Reynolds WC. Improved turbulence models based on large eddy simulation of homogeneous, incompressible, turbulent flows [PhDdissertation]. Stanford (CA): Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Vreman B, Geurts B, Kuerten H. On the formulation of the dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model. Phys Fluids. 1994;6(12):4057–4059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe K. An improved anisotropy-resolving subgrid-scale model with the aid of a scale-similarity modeling concept. Int J Heat Fluid Fl. 2013;39:42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardina J, Ferziger JH, Reynolds WC. Improved subgrid scale models for large eddy simulation. 13th Fluid and PlasmaDynamics Conference, Fluid Dynamics and Co-located Conferences, AIAA Paper. 1980 Jul 14–16; Snowmass (CO); 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Moser RD, Kim J, Mansour NN., Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ = 590. Phys Fluids. 1999;11:943–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose T, Kihara H, Abe K. Numerical simulation of flow field around a wing with surface oscillation using an immersed boundary method. The 90th conference of JSME fluid dynamics division; 2012 Nov 17–18; Kyoto; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chung D, Chan L, MacDonald M, et al. A fast direct numerical simulation method for characterising hydraulic roughness. J Fluid Mech. 2015;773:418–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• http://www.ciss.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/rss21/.
   Google Scholar
• Abe K. An investigation of SGS-stress anisotropy modeling in complex turbulent flow fields. Flow Turbulence Combus. 2014;92:503–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar