Extensive characterisation of a high Reynolds number decelerating boundary layer using advanced optical metrology

References

• Ludwig H, Tillman W. Investigations of the wall shearing stress in turbulent boundary layers. Nat Adv Comm Aero Wash Tech Mem. 1950;1285.
   Google Scholar
• Perry A, Shofield W. Mean velocity and shear stress distribution in turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids. 1973;113:2068–2074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skare PE, Krogstad PA. A turbulent boundary layer near separation. J Fluid Mech. 1994;272:319–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsberry K, Loeffler J, Zhou M, et al. An experimental study of a boundary layer that is maintained on the verge of separation. J Fluid Mech. 2000;423:227–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry A, Marusic I, Jones M. On the streamwise evolution of turbulent boundary layers in arbitrary pressure gradient. J Fluid Mech. 2002;461:61–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagib HM, Christophorou C, Monkewitz PA. In: Meier GEA, Sreenivasan KR, editors. High Reynold number turbulent boundary layers subjected to various pressure-gradient conditions. Göttingen: Springer; 2004. p. 383–394.
   Google Scholar
• Maciel Y, Rossignol K, Lemay J. Similarity in the outer region of adverse-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J. 2006;44(11):2450–2464.
   Google Scholar
• Aubertine CD, Eaton JK. Reynolds number scaling in a non-equilibrium turbulent boundary layer with mild adverse pressure gradient. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow. 2006;27:566–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pranav J, Xiaofeng L, Joseph K. Effect of mean and fluctuating pressure gradients on boundary layer turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 2014;748:36–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopp T, Buchmann NA, Schanz D, et al. Investigation of scaling laws in a turbulent boundary layer flow with adverse pressure gradient using PIV. J Turbul. 2015;16(3):250–272. doi:10.1080/14685248.2014.943906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George WK, Stanislas M, Laval J-P. New insights into adverse pressure gradient boundary layers. APS Bull, 63rd APS meeting; Nov 2010; Long Beach, CA.
   Google Scholar
• George WK, Stanislas M, Laval J-P. New insights into adverse pressure gradient boundary layers. ITI 2010 Turbulence Conference; 2010 Sep 19–22; Bertinoro (Italy).
   Google Scholar
• Marquillie M, Laval J-P, Dolganov R. Direct numerical simulation of separated channel flows with a smooth profile. J Turbul. 2008;9(1):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquillie M, Ehrenstein U, Laval J-P. Instability of streaks in wall turbulence with adverse pressure gradient. J Fluid Mech. 2011;681:205–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George WK, Castillo L. The zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer. Appl Mech Rev. 1997;50:689–729.
   Google Scholar
• Tutkun M, George WK, Delville J, et al. Two-point correlations and POD analysis of the WALLTURB experiment, using the hot-wire rake database. Progress in wall turbulence: understanding and modelling, ERCOFTAC Series. Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Österlund J. Experimental studies of zero-pressure gradient turbulent [dissertation]. Stockholm: KTH; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Carlier J, Stanislas M. Experimental study of eddy structures in a turbulent boundary layer using particule image velocimetry. J Fluid Mech. 2005;535:143–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincenti P, Klewicki J, Morrill-Winter C, et al. Streamwise velocity statistics in turbulent boundary layers that spatially develop to high Reynolds number. Exp. Fluids. 2013;54(1629):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Vallikivi M, Hultmark M, Smits AJ. Turbulent boundary layer statistics at very high Reynolds numbers. J Fluid. Mech. 2015;779:371–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva CM, Gnanamanickam EP, Atkinson C, et al. High spatial range velocity measurements in a high Reynolds number turbulent. Phys Fluids. 2014;26(025117):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lee M, Moser RD. irect numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ ≃ 5200. J Fluid Mech. 2015;774:395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong J, Hussain F, Schoppa W, et al. Coherent structures near the wall in a turbulent channel flow. J Fluid Mech. 1997;332:185–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez J, Pinelli A. The autonomous cycle of near wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 1999;389:335–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoppa W, Hussain F. Coherent structure generation in near wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 2002;453:57–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawahara G, Jiménez J, Uhlmann M, et al. Linear instability of a corrugate vortex sheet – a model for streak instabilit. J Fluid Mech. 2003;483:315–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez J, Moin P. The minimal flow unit in near wall turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 1991;225:213–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton JM, Kim J, Waleffe F. Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures. J Fluid Mech. 1995;287:317–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez J, Simens M. Low-dimensional dynamics in a turbulent wall. J Fluid Mech. 2001;435:81–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waleffe F. Exact coherent structures in channel flow. J Fluid Mech. 2001;2001:93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kawahara G, Kida S. Periodic motion embedded in plane Couette turbulence: regeneration cycle and burst. J Fluid Mech. 2001;449:291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adrian RJ. Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence. Phys Fluids. 2007;19(041301).
   Google Scholar
• Marusic I, Mathis R, Hutchins N. Predictive model for wall‐bounded turbulent flow. Science. 2010;329(5988):193–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuvier C, Foucaut J-M, Braud C, et al. Characterisation of a high Reynolds number boundary layer subject to pressure gradient and separation. J Turbul. 2014;15(8):473–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willert C, Gharib M. Digital particle image velocimetry. Exp Fluids. 1991;10:181–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soria J. An investigation of the near wake of a circular cylinder using a video-based digital cross-correlation particle image velocimetry technique. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 1996;12:221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarano F. Iterative image deformation methods in PIV. Meas Sci Technol. 2002;13:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecordier B, Trinité M. Advanced PIV algorithms with image distortion validation and comparison using synthetic images of turbulent flow. Proceedings of the Workshop on Particle image velocimetry: recent improvements, March 31 – April 1, Zaragoza, Spain. M. Stanislas, J. Westerweel, J. Kompenhans editors, Springer Verlag Berlin; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Raffel M, Willert C, Wereley S, et al. Particle image velocimetry, a practical guide. 2nd ed. Springer Verlag; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson RL. Turbulent boundary layer separation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 1989;21:205–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster DR, DeGraaff DB, Eaton JK. Turbulence characteristics of a boundary layer on a two-dimensional bump. J Fluid Mech. 1996;320:53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Squires KD. Numerical investigation of the turbulent boundary layer over a bump. J Fluid Mech. 1998;362:229–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah SI, Laval JP, Stanislas M. A specific behaviour of adverse pressure gradient near wall flows. In: Progress in wall turbulence: understanding and modeling Springer ERCOFTAC Series; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wieneke B. Stereo-PIV using self-calibration on particle images. Exp Fluids. 2005;39:267–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soloff SM, Adrian RJ, Liu ZC. Distortion compensation for generalized stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol. 1997;8:1441–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucaut J-M, Coudert S, Braud C, et al. Influence of light sheet separation on SPIV measurement in a large field spanwise plane. Meas Sci Technol. 2014;25:035304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar