Use of DES in mildly separated internal flow: dimples in a turbulent channel

References

• Spalart PR, Jou WH, Strelets M, et al. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings and on a hybrid, RANS/LES approach. In: Liu C, Liu Z, editors. Advances in DNS/LES: Proceedings of 1st AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, Aug 4–8, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA. Columbus (OH): Greyden Press; 1997. P. 137–147.
   Google Scholar
• Shur M, Spalart PR, Strelets M, et al. Detached-eddy simulation of an airfoil at high angle of attack. Eng Turb Modelling Exp. 1999;4:669–678.
   Google Scholar
• Claus MP, Morton SA, Cummings RM, Bury Y. DES turbulence modeling on the C-130 comparison between computational and experimental results. AIAA 2005-0884, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan A, Tafti DK. Detached eddy simulation of turbulent flow and heat transfer in a ribbed duct. J Fluids Eng. 2005;127:888–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwamborn D, Strelets S, Mockett C. Application of hybrid RANS_LES approaches to attached and mildly separated flows. 11th World Congress on Computational Mechanics; 2014 July 20–25; Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Caruelle B, Ducros F. Detached-eddy simulations of attached and detached boundary layers. Int J CFD. 2003;17:433–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikitin NV, Nicoud F, Wasistho B, et al. An approach to wall modeling in large-eddy simulations. Phys Fluids. 2000;12:1629–1632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienhart H, Breuer M, Köksoy, C. Drag reduction by dimples? – A complementary experimental/numerical investigation. Int J Heat and Fluid Flow. 2008;29(3):783–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldhuis LLM, Vervoort E. Drag effect of a dented surface in a turbulent flow. 27th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference; 2009 June; San Antonio, TX, AIAA paper 2009–3950.
   Google Scholar
• Tay CM. Determining the effect of dimples on drag in a turbulent channel flow. 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit; 2011 Jan; Orlando, FL. AIAA paper 2011–0682.
   Google Scholar
• van Nesselrooij M, Veldhuis LLM, van Oudheusden BW, et al. Drag reduction by means of dimpled surfaces in turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids. 2016;57(142):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Tay CMJ, Khoo BC, Chew YT. Mechanics of drag reduction by shallow dimples in channel flow. Phys Fluids. 2015;27(3):035109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iuso G, Onorato M, Spazzini, PG, et al. Wall turbulence manipulation by large scale streamwise vortices. J Fluid Mech. 2002;473:23–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won SY, Zhang Q, Ligrani PM. Comparisons of flow structure above dimpled surfaces with different dimple depths in a channel. Phys Fluids. 2005;17:045105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligrani PM, Harrison JL, Mahmood GI, et al. Flow structure due to dimple depression on a channel surface. Phys Fluids. 2001;13(11):3442–3451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay CM, Chew YT, Khoo BC, et al. Development of flow structures over dimples. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci. 2014;52:278–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Campenhout OWG, van Nesselrooij M, Veldhuis LLM, et al. Flow visualization over drag reducing dimpled surfaces in turbulent boundary layers using Particle Image Velocimetry. 18th International Symposium on the Application of Laser and Imaging Techniques to Fluid Mechanics; 2016 July 4–7; Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Karniadakis GE, Choi KS. Mechanisms on transverse motions in turbulent wall flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2003;35:45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JI, Xu CX, Sung HJ. Drag reduction by spanwise wall oscillation in wall-bounded turbulent flows. AIAA J. 2002;40(5):842–850.
   Google Scholar
• Ricco P, Quadrio M. Wall-oscillation conditions for drag reduction in turbulent channel flow. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2008;29:891–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoppa W, Hussain F. A large-scale control strategy for drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids. 1998;10(5):1049–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quadrio M, Ricco P. Critical assessment of turbulent drag reduction through spanwise wall oscillation. J Fluid Mech. 2004;521:251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess NK, Ligrani PM. Effects of dimple depth on channel nusselt numbers and friction factors. J Heat Transfer. 2005;127(8):839–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Chew YT, Khoo BC. Enhancement of heat transfer in turbulent channel flow over dimpled surface. Int J Heat Mass Trans. 2012;55:8100–8121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Chew YT, Khoo BC. Heat transfer and flow structure in turbulent channel flow over protrusions. Int J Heat Mass Trans. 2013;66:177–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalart PR, Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. La Recherche Ae´rospatiale. 1994;1:5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Travin A, Shur M, Strelets M, et al. Detached-eddy simulations past a circular cylinder. Flow Turbul Comb. 2000;63:293–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Moin P, Moser RD. Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech. 1987;177:133–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser RD, Kim J, Mansour NN. Direct numerical simulations of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ = 590. Phys Fluids. 1999;11:943–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo BC, Chew YT, Li GL. Effects of imperfect spatial resolution on turbulence measurements in the very near-wall viscous sublayer. Exp Fluids. 1997;22:327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlandi P, Jimenez J. On the generation of turbulent wall friction. Phys Fluids A. 1994;6:634–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZJ, Chi XK, Shih T, et al. Direct simulation of surface roughness effects with RANS and DES approaches in viscous adaptive cartesian grids. AIAA Flow Conference; 2004 Jun; Portland, AIAA paper 2004-2420.
   Google Scholar
• Bozinoski R, Davis RL. A DES procedure applied to a wall-mounted hump. 19th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics; 2009 Jun; San Antonio, AIAA 2009-3667.
   Google Scholar
• Squires KD. Detached-eddy simulation: current status and perspectives. In: Friedrich R, Geurts BJ., Metais O, editors. Direct and large-eddy simulation V. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004. p. 465–480.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinescu G, Squires, KD. Numerical investigation of the flow over a sphere in the subcritical and supercritical regimes. Phys Fluids. 2004;16(5):1449–1467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan V, Squires KD, Forsythe JR. Prediction of the flow around a circular cylinder at high Reynolds number. AIAA 2006-0901, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinescu GS, Pasinato H., Wang YQ. Squares KD. Numerical investigation of flow past a prolate spheroid. J Fluids Eng. 2002;124:904–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi KS, DeBisschop JR, Clayton BR. Turbulent boundary layer control by means of spanwise-wall oscillation. AIAA J. 1998;36:1157–1163.
   Google Scholar
• Pope SB. Turbulent Flows. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Knaepen B, Debliquy O, Carati D. A dynamic procedure for calculating the turbulent kinetic energy. In: Liu C, Sakell L, Beutner T, editors. DNS/LES Progress and Challenges: Proceedings of the 3rd AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, Aug 5–9, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX. Columbus (OH): Greyden Press; 2001. p. 311–318.
   Google Scholar
• Fröhlich J, Von Terzi D. Hybrid LES/RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows. Prog Aerosp Sci. 2008;44:349–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar