Multi-scale/fractal processes in the wake of a wind turbine array boundary layer

References

• Ali N, Cortina G, Hamilton N, et al. Turbulence characteristics of a thermally stratified wind turbine array boundary layer via proper orthogonal decomposition. J Fluid Mech. 2017;828:175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali N, Hamilton N, Cortina G. Anisotropy stress invariants of thermally stratified wind turbine array boundary layers using Large Eddy simulations. J Renew Sust Energy. 2018;10(1):013301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali N, Hamilton N, DeLucia D, et al. Assessing spacing impact on coherent features in a wind turbine array boundary layer. Wind Energy Sci. 2018;3(1):43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stresing R, Peinke J. Towards a stochastic multi-point description of turbulence. New J Phys. 2010;12(10):103046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keylock CJ, Stresing R, Peinke J. Gradual wavelet reconstruction of the velocity increments for turbulent wakes. Phys Fluids. 2015;27(2):025104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali N, Kadum HF, Cal RB. Focused-based multifractal analysis of the wake in a wind turbine array utilizing proper orthogonal decomposition. J Renew Sust Energy. 2016;8(6):63306-1–63306-19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali N, Aseyev AS, Melius M. Evaluation of higher order moments and isotropy in the wake of a wind turbine array. Whither turbulence and big data in the 21st century? Berlin: Springer; 2017. p. 273–292.
   Google Scholar
• Chevillard L, Castaing B, Lévêque E. On the rapid increase of intermittency in the near-dissipation range of fully developed turbulence. Eur Phys J B-Condens Matter Complex Syst. 2005;45(4):561–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevillard L, Roux SG, Lévêque E. Intermittency of velocity time increments in turbulence. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;95(6):064501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevillard L, Castaing B, Lévêque E, et al. Unified multifractal description of velocity increments statistics in turbulence: intermittency and skewness. Phys D. 2006;218(1):77–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneveau C, Sreenivasan KR. The multifractal nature of turbulent energy dissipation. J Fluid Mech. 1991;224:429–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneveau C, Sreenivasan KR. Simple multifractal cascade model for fully developed turbulence. Phys Rev Lett. 1987;59(13):1424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolmogorov AN. Dissipation of energy in locally isotropic turbulence. 1941. p. 16–18. (Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR; vol. 32).
   Google Scholar
• Kolmogorov AN. A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high reynolds number. J Fluid Mech. 1962;13(1):82–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch U, Sulem PL, Nelkin M. A simple dynamical model of intermittent fully developed turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 1978;87(4):719–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She ZS, Leveque E. Universal scaling laws in fully developed turbulence. Phys Rev Lett. 1994;72(3):336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzi R, Ciliberto S, Tripiccione R, et al. Extended self-similarity in turbulent flows. Phys Rev E. 1993;48(1):R29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubrulle B. Intermittency in fully developed turbulence: log-poisson statistics and generalized scale covariance. Phys Rev Lett. 1994;73(7):959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babiano A, Dubrulle B, Frick P. Some properties of two-dimensional inverse energy cascade dynamics. Phys Rev E. 1997;55(3):2693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali N, Aseyev AS, Cal RB. Structure functions, scaling exponents and intermittency in the wake of a wind turbine array. J Renew Sust Energy. 2016;8(1):013304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keylock CJ, Nishimura K, Peinke J. A classification scheme for turbulence based on the velocity-intermittency structure with an application to near-wall flow and with implications for bed load transport. J Geophys Res. 2012;117(F1):F01037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praskovsky AA, Gledzer EB, Karyakin MY, et al. The sweeping decorrelation hypothesis and energy–inertial scale interaction in high reynolds number flows. J Fluid Mech. 1993;248:493–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreenivasan KR, Stolovitzky G. Statistical dependence of inertial range properties on large scales in a high-reynolds-number shear flow. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;77(11):2218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosokawa I. A paradox concerning the refined similarity hypothesis of Kolmogorov for isotropic turbulence. Progress Theor Phys. 2007;118(1):169–173.
   Google Scholar
• Stresing R, Peinke J, Seoud R. Defining a new class of turbulent flows. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104(19):194501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner C, Peinke J, Friedrich R. Experimental indications for markov properties of small-scale turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 2001;433:383–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risken H. Fokker-Planck equation. The Fokker-Planck equation. Berlin: Springer;1984. p. 63–95.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich R, Peinke J. Description of a turbulent cascade by a Fokker-Planck equation. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;78(5):863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melius MS, Tutkun M, Cal RB. Identification of Markov process within a wind turbine array boundary layer. J Renew Sust Energy. 2014;6(2):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melius MS, Tutkun M, Cal RB. Solution of the Fokker-Planck equation in a wind turbine array boundary layer. Phys D. 2014;280:14–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickelsen D, Engel A. Probing small-scale intermittency with a fluctuation theorem. Phys Rev Lett. 2013;110(21):138701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinke N, Fuchs A, Nickelsen D, et al. On universal features of the turbulent cascade in terms of non-equilibrium thermodynamics. J Fluid Mech. 2018;848:117–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal Y, Acho L, Cifre I, et al. Wind turbine synchronous reset pitch control. Energies. 2017;10(6):770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mücke T, Kleinhans D, Peinke J. Atmospheric turbulence and its influence on the alternating loads on wind turbines. Wind Energy. 2011;14(2):301–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCarolis JF, Keith DW. The economics of large-scale wind power in a carbon constrained world. Energy Policy. 2006;34(4):395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calif R, Schmitt FG. Multiscaling and joint multiscaling description of the atmospheric wind speed and the aggregate power output from a wind farm. Nonlinear Process Geophys. 2014;21(2):379–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schottler J, Reinke N, Hölling A, et al. On the impact of non-gaussian wind statistics on wind turbines–an experimental approach. Wind Energy Sci. 2017;2(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmietendorf K, Peinke J, Kamps O. The impact of turbulent renewable energy production on power grid stability and quality. Eur Phys J B. 2017;90(11):222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keylock CJ. A criterion for delimiting active periods within turbulent flows. Geophys Res Lett. 2008;35(11):L11804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschall J, Peinke J. On the definition and handling of different drift and diffusion estimates. New J Phys. 2008;10(8):083034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honisch C, Friedrich R. Estimation of Kramers-Moyal coefficients at low sampling rates. Phys Rev E. 2011;83(6):066701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinhans D, Friedrich R, Nawroth A, et al. An iterative procedure for the estimation of drift and diffusion coefficients of Langevin processes. Phys Lett A. 2005;346(1):42–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawroth AP, Peinke J, Kleinhans D. Improved estimation of fokker-planck equations through optimization. Phys Rev E. 2007;76(5):056102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickelsen D. Master equation for she-leveque scaling and its classification in terms of other markov models of developed turbulence. Preprint, 2017, arXiv:170205766.
   Google Scholar
• Feller W. An introduction to probability theory and its applications. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzynski C. Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;78(14):2690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert U. Entropy production along a stochastic trajectory and an integral fluctuation theorem. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;95(4):040602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi G, Ghil M. Turbulence and predictability in geophysical fluid dynamics and climate dynamics. Proceedings of the International School of Physic Enrico Fermi, Course lxxxviii, Varenna on lake como, Villa monastero, 1983 Jun 14–24. North-Holland; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Muzy JF, Bacry E, Arneodo A. Wavelets and multifractal formalism for singular signals: application to turbulence data. Phys Rev Lett. 1991;67(25):3515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keylock CJ, Chang KS, Constantinescu GS. Large eddy simulation of the velocity-intermittency structure for flow over a field of symmetric dunes. J Fluid Mech. 2016;805:656–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolwankar KM, Lévy-Véhel J. A time domain characterization of the fine local regularity of functions. J Fourier Anal Appl. 2002;8(4):319–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffard S. Multifractal formalism for functions part I: results valid for all functions. SIAM J Math Anal. 1997;28(4):944–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seuret S, Lévy-Véhel J. A time domain characterization of 2-microlocal spaces. J Fourier Anal Appl. 2003;9(5):473–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricot C. Curves and fractal dimension. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo L, Legrand P, Lévy-Véhel J. The estimation of Hölderian regularity using genetic programming. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. ACM; 2010. p. 861–868.
   Google Scholar
• Keylock CJ. Characterizing the structure of nonlinear systems using gradual wavelet reconstruction. Nonlinear Process Geophys. 2010;17(6):615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa H, Nezu I. Prediction of the contributions to the reynolds stress from bursting events in open-channel flows. J Fluid Mech. 1977;80(1):99–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogard DG, Tiederman WG. Burst detection with single-point velocity measurements. J Fluid Mech. 1986;162:389–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keylock CJ, Singh A, Venditti JG, et al. Robust classification for the joint velocity-intermittency structure of turbulent flow over fixed and mobile bedforms. Earth Surf Proc Land. 2014;39(13):1717–1728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali N, Hamilton N, Calaf M. Turbulence kinetic energy budget and conditional sampling of momentum, scalar, and intermittency fluxes in thermally stratified wind farms. J Turbul. 2019;20(1):1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Keylock CJ, Ganapathasubramani B, Monty J. The coupling between inner and outer scales in a zero pressure boundary layer evaluated using a Hölder exponent framework. Fluid Dyn Res. 2016;48(2):021405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cal RB, Lebrón J, Castillo L. Experimental study of the horizontally averaged flow structure in a model wind-turbine array boundary layer. J Renew Sust Energy. 2010;2(1):013106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter DW, Coletti F. Scale-to-scale anisotropy in homogeneous turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 2017;827:250–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope SB. Turbulent flows. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Tardu S. Statistical approach to wall turbulence. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Aseyev AS, Cal RB. Vortex identification in the wake of a model wind turbine array. J Turbul. 2016;17(4):357–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viggiano B, Gion MS, Ali N. Inverse structure functions in the canonical wind turbine array boundary layer. J Renew Sust Energy. 2016;8(5):053310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullback S, Leibler RA. On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat. 1951;22(1):79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy KP. Machine learning a probabilistic perspective. Cambridge: MIT press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Li TF. An efficient algorithm to find the MLE of prior probabilities of a mixture in pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit. 1996;29(2):337–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotoca JM, Pla F. Supervised feature selection by clustering using conditional mutual information-based distances. Pattern Recognit. 2010;43(6):2068–2081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Moustafa KT, De La Torre F, Ferrie FP. Pareto models for discriminative multiclass linear dimensionality reduction. Pattern Recognit. 2015;48(5):1863–1877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moacir P, Kittler J, Riva M, et al. A decision cognizant Kullback-Leibler divergence. Pattern Recognit. 2017;61:470–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji Y, Nakamura I. Probability density function in the log-law region of low reynolds number turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids. 1999;11(3):647–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren B, Johansson AV, Tsuji Y. Universality of probability density distributions in the overlap region in high reynolds number turbulent boundary layers. Phys Fluids. 2004;16(7):2587–2591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji Y, Lindgren B, Johansson AV. Self-similar profile of probability density functions in zero-pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Fluid Dyn Res. 2005;37(5):293–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou A, Klewicki J. Properties of the streamwise velocity fluctuations in the inertial layer of turbulent boundary layers and their connection to self-similar mean dynamics. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2015;51:372–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxton ORH. Modulation of the velocity gradient tensor by concurrent large-scale velocity fluctuations in a turbulent mixing layer. J Fluid Mech. 2015;777:R1-1–R1-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granero-Belinchon C, Roux SG, Garnier NB. A Kullback-Leibler divergence measure of intermittency: application to turbulence. Preprint, 2017. arXiv:170707950.
   Google Scholar
• Willmarth WW, Lu SS. Structure of the reynolds stress near the wall. J Fluid Mech. 1972;55(1):65–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raupach MR. Conditional statistics of reynolds stress in rough-wall and smooth-wall turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech. 1981;108:363–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katul G, Poggi D, Cava D, et al. The relative importance of ejections and sweeps to momentum transfer in the atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary Layer Meteorol. 2006;120(3):367–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar