A generalised wall function including compressibility and pressure-gradient terms for the Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model

References

• Launder BE, Spalding DB. Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence; Academic Press, London, UK, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• White FM, Christoph G. A simple theory for the two-dimensional compressible turbulent boundary layer. J Basic Eng. 1972;94(3):636–642. doi: 10.1115/1.3425519
   Google Scholar
• Tennekes H, Lumley JL. A first course in turbulence. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: MIT Press; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols RH, Nelson C. Wall function boundary conditions including heat transfer and compressibility. AIAA J. 2004;42(6):1107–1114. doi: 10.2514/1.3539
   Google Scholar
• Ota DK, Goldberg UC. Law of the wall with consistent no-slip limit. AIAA Paper; Atlanta, GA, U.S.A; 1997. p. 97–2246.
   Google Scholar
• Viegas J, Rubesin M, Horstman C. On the use of wall functions as boundary conditions for two-dimensional separated compressible flows. 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting; Reno, NV, U.S.A; 1985. p. 180.
   Google Scholar
• Smith B. The k-kl turbulence model and wall layer model for compressible flows. 21st Fluid dynamics, plasma dynamics and lasers conference; Seattle, WA, U.S.A; 1990. p. 1483.
   Google Scholar
• Craft T, Gant S, Iacovides H, et al. A new wall function strategy for complex turbulent flows. Numer Heat Transf B. 2004;45(4):301–318. doi: 10.1080/10407790490277931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols R. Development and validation of a two-equation turbulence model with wall functions for compressible flow. 14th Applied Aerodynamics Conference; New Orleans, LA, U.S.A; 1996. p. 2385.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg U, Peroomian O, Chakravarthy S. A wall-distance-free k-ϵ model with enhanced near-wall treatment. J Fluids Eng. 1998;120(3):457–462. doi: 10.1115/1.2820684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopp T, Alrutz T, Schwamborn D. A grid and flow adaptive wall-function method for rans turbulence modelling. J Comput Phys. 2006;220(1):19–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medic G, Kalitzin G, Iaccarino G. Adaptive wall functions with applications. 36th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit; San Francisco, California; 2006; 06-3744.
   Google Scholar
• Menter F, Esch T. Elements of industrial heat transfer predictions. 16th Brazilian Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM); Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Vol. 109; 2001. p. 117–127.
   Google Scholar
• Menter F, Ferreira JC, Esch T. The SST turbulence model with improved wall treatment for heat transfer predictions in gas turbines. Proceedings of the international gas turbine congress; Tokyo, Japan; 2003. p. 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Menter F, Kuntz M, Langtry R. Ten years of industrial experience with the sst turbulence model. Turbul Heat Mass Transf. 2003;4(1):625–632.
   Google Scholar
• Menter FR. Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective. Int J Comut Fluid Dyn. 2009;23(4):305–316. doi: 10.1080/10618560902773387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segunda VM, Ormiston S, Tachie M. Numerical analysis of turbulent flow over a wavy wall in a channel. ASME 2016 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting collocated with the ASME 2016 Heat Transfer Summer Conference and the ASME 2016 14th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels; American Society of Mechanical Engineers; Washington, DC, USA; 2016. p. V01AT03A014–V01AT03A014.
   Google Scholar
• Assam A, Kalkote NN, Sharma V, et al. An automatic wall treatment for Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model. J Fluids Eng. 2018 Jan. doi: 10.1115/1.4039087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih TH, Povinelli LA, Liu NS. Application of generalized wall function for complex turbulent flows. In: Rodi W, Fueyo N, editors. Engineering turbulence modelling and experiments. Vol. 5. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd; 2002. p. 177–186. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080441146500168
   Google Scholar
• Ong K, Chan A. A unified wall function for compressible turbulence modelling. J Turbul. 2018;19(5):414–430. doi: 10.1080/14685248.2018.1453142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih TH, Povinelli LA, Liu NS. A generalized wall function; NASATM 209398; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Blazek J. Computational fluid dynamics principles and applications. San Diego (CA): Elsevier; 2005. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780080445069
   Google Scholar
• Weiss JM, Maruszewski JP, Smith WA. Implicit solution of preconditioned Navier-Stokes equations using algebraic multigrid. AIAA J. 1999;37(1):29–36. doi: 10.2514/2.689
   Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Assam A, Eswaran V. Development of all speed three dimensional computational fluid dynamics solver for unstructured grids. 6th International and 43rd National Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power (FMFP); Allahabad, India; 2016. p. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Kays WM. Turbulent Prandtl number–where are we? J Heat Transfer. 1994;116(2):284–295. doi: 10.1115/1.2911398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalart P, Allmaras S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows; 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit; Reno, NV, U.S.A; 1992. p. 439.
   Google Scholar
• Dacles-Mariani J, Zilliac GG, Chow JS, et al. Numerical/experimental study of a wingtip vortex in the near field. AIAA J. 1995;33(9):1561–1568. doi: 10.2514/3.12826
   Google Scholar
• Dacles-Mariani J, Kwak D, Zilliac G. On numerical errors and turbulence modeling in tip vortex flow prediction.  Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 1999;30(1):65–82. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0363(19990515)30:1<65::AID-FLD839>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalart PR, Rumsey CL. Effective inflow conditions for turbulence models in aerodynamic calculations. AIAA J. 2007;45(10):2544. doi: 10.2514/1.29373
   Google Scholar
• Turbulence modeling resource; 2019. Available from: https://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Bredberg J. On the wall boundary condition for turbulence models. Goteborg: Department of Thermo and Fluid Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology; 2000. Internal report 00/4.
   Google Scholar
• Bredberg J, Peng S, Davidson L. On the wall boundary condition for computing turbulent heat transfer with K-omega models. ASME-Publications-HTD. 2000;366:243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Moryossef Y, Levy Y. Unconditionally positive implicit procedure for two-equation turbulence models: application to k−ω turbulence models. J Comput Phys. 2006;220(1):88–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Assam A, Eswaran V. Development of an unstructured cfd solver for external aerothermodynamics and nano/micro flows [dissertation]. Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad; Hyderabad, India; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kalkote N, Assam A, Eswaran V. Acceleration of later convergence in a density-based solver using adaptive time stepping. AIAA J. 2018;57(1):352–364. doi: 10.2514/1.J057014
   Google Scholar
• Assam A, Kalkote N, Dongari N. Comprehensive evaluation of a new type of Smoluchowski temperature jump condition. AIAA Journal. 2018;56(11):4621–4625. doi:10.2514/1.J057385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nived MR. Parallelization of a hybrid unstructured grid density-based flow solver [master's thesis]. Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad; 2018. Available from: http://raiith.iith.ac.in/4361/
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Bai JQ, Xu JL. A scale-adaptive turbulence model based on the k-equation and recalibrated reynolds stress constitutive relation. J Fluids Eng. 2016;138(6):61203. doi: 10.1115/1.4032535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krist SL, Biedron RT, Rumsey CL. Cfl3d user's manual (version 5.0); 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wieghardt K, Tillmann W. On the turbulent friction layer for rising pressure, NASA, Washington, DC, Technical Report No. TM-1314, 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Salim SM, Cheah S. Wall y+ strategy for dealing with wall-bounded turbulent flows. Proceedings of the International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists; Hong Kong, Vol. 2; 2009. p. 2165–2170.
   Google Scholar
• Berger MJ, Aftosmis MJ. An ODE-based wall model for turbulent flow simulations. AIAA J. 2017 Sep;56(2):700–714. doi: 10.2514/1.J056151
   Google Scholar
• Samuel A, Joubert P. A boundary layer developing in an increasingly adverse pressure gradient. J Fluid Mech. 1974;66(3):481–505. doi: 10.1017/S0022112074000322
   Google Scholar
• Klein TS. The development and application of two-time-scale turbulence models for non-equilibrium flows [dissertation]. The University of Manchester; Manchester, UK; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bardina J, Huang P, Coakley T. Turbulence modeling validation, testing, and development. NASA Technical Memorandum 110446; Ames Research Center, California, USA; 1997 May.
   Google Scholar
• Cook P, McDonald M, Firmin M. Rae2822–pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements. Experimental data base for computer program assessment, Farnborough, UKAGARD, Report AR-138, 1979.
   Google Scholar