Direct numerical simulations of forced homogeneous isotropic turbulence in a dense gas

References

• Bethe HA. On the theory of shock waves for an arbitrary equation of state. In: Johnson JN, Chéret R, editors. Classic papers in shock compression science. Springer, New-York; 1998:421–495.
   Google Scholar
• Zeldovich J. On the propagation of shock waves in gases with a reversible chemical reaction. Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi I Teoreticheskoi Fiziki. 1946;16(4):365–368.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson PA, Lambrakis K. Negative shock waves. J Fluid Mech. 1973;60(1):187–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer M, Kluwick A. On the propagation of waves exhibiting both positive and negative nonlinearity. J Fluid Mech. 1984;142:9–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durá Galiana FJ, Wheeler AP, Ong J. A study of trailing-edge losses in organic rankine cycle turbines. J Turbomach. 2016;138(12):121003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durá Galiana FJ, Wheeler AP, Ong J. The effect of dense gas dynamics on loss in ORC transonic turbines. J Phys Conf Ser. 2017;821(1):012021.
   Google Scholar
• Breuer M, Jovičić N, Mazaev K. Comparison of DES, RANS and LES for the separated flow around a flat plate at high incidence. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 2003;41(4):357–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giauque A, Corre C, Menghetti M. Direct numerical simulations of homogeneous isotropic turbulence in a dense gas. J Phys Conf Ser. 2017;821(1):012017.
   Google Scholar
• Sciacovelli L, Cinnella P, Content C, et al. Dense gas effects in inviscid homogeneous isotropic turbulence. J Fluid Mech. 2016;800:140–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergason S, Ho T, Argrow BM, et al. Theory for producing a single-phase rarefaction shock wave in a shock tube. J Fluid Mech. 2001;445:37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello MG, Flynn RM, Owens JG. Fluoroethers and fluoroamines. In: Othmer K, Kirk RE, editors. Encyclopedia of chemical technology. John Wiley & Sons, New-York; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer MS. Negative nonlinearity in selected fluorocarbons. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dyn. 1989;1(11):1894–1897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colonna P, Guardone A. Molecular interpretation of nonclassical gas dynamics of dense vapors under the van der Waals model. Phys Fluids. 2006;18(5):056101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JJ, Hou Yc. Development of an equation of state for gases. AIChE J. 1955;2(4):142–151.
   Google Scholar
• Chung TH, Ajlan M, Lee LL, et al. Generalized multiparameter correlation for nonpolar and polar fluid transport properties. Ind Engin Chem Res. 1988;27(4):671–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland W. LII. The viscosity of gases and molecular force. Lond Edinburgh Dublin Philos Mag J Sci. 1893;36(223):507–531.
   Google Scholar
• Martin JJ, Kapoor RM, De Nevers N. An improved equation of state for gases. AIChE J. 1959;5(2):159–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardone A, Argrow BM. Nonclassical gasdynamic region of selected fluorocarbons. Phys Fluids. 2005;17(11):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönfeld T, Rudgyard M. Steady and unsteady flow simulations using the hybrid flow solver AVBP. AIAA J. 1999 nov;37(11):1378–1385.
   Google Scholar
• Colin O, Rudgyard M. Development of high-order Taylor–Galerkin schemes for LES. J Comput Phys. 2000 Aug;162(2):338–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staffelbach G, Gicquel L, Boudier G, et al. Large Eddy simulation of self excited azimuthal modes in annular combustors. Proc Combustion Inst. 2009;32(2):2909–2916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gicquel LLYM, Staffelbach GG, Poinsot TT. Large Eddy simulations of gaseous flames in gas turbine combustion chambers. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2012 Dec;38(6):783–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giauque A, Selle L, Gicquel L, et al. System identification of a large-scale swirled partially premixed combustor using LES and measurements. J Turbulence. 2005 Jan;6(21):N21.
   Google Scholar
• Singh A, Chatterjee A. Numerical prediction of supersonic jet screech frequency. Shock Waves. 2007 nov;17(4):263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook AW, Cabot WH. A high-wavenumber viscosity for high-resolution numerical methods. J Comput Phys. 2004 apr;195(2):594–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moin P, Mahesh K. Direct numerical simulation: a tool in turbulence research. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 1998;30(1):539–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundgren TS. Linearly forced isotropic turbulence. Ann Res Briefs. 2003;1(2):461–473.
   Google Scholar
• Rosales C, Meneveau C. Linear forcing in numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence: Physical space Implementations and convergence properties. Phys Fluids. 2005;17(9):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen MR, Livescu D. Forcing for statistically stationary compressible isotropic turbulence. Physics of Fluids. 2010;22(11):116101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kritsuk AG, Norman ML, Padoan P, et al. The statistics of supersonic isothermal turbulence. Astrophys J. 2007;665(1):416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samtaney R, Pullin DI, Kosović B, et al. Direct numerical simulation of decaying compressible turbulence and shocklet statistics. Phys Fluids. 2001;13(5):1415–1430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluie H. Scale locality and the inertial range in compressible turbulence. Bull Amer Phys Soc. 2012;57(17).
   Google Scholar
• Aluie H, Li S, Li H. The conservative cascade of kinetic energy in compressible turbulence. Astrophys J Lett. 2012;751(2):L29 (6pp).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluie H, Li S, Li H. Scale decomposition in compressible turbulence. Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena. 2013;247(1):54–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poinsot TJ, Lele SK. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J Comput Phys. 1992;101(1):104–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar