Effects of CFJ flow control on aerodynamic performance of symmetric NACA airfoils

References

• Zhao L, Yang S. Influence of thickness variation on the flapping performance of symmetric NACA airfoils in plunging motion. Math Probl Eng. 2010;2010:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh S-C, Kang S-H. Effects of a blade profile, the Reynolds number, and the solidity on the performance of a straight bladed vertical axis wind turbine. J Mech Sci Technol. 2013;27(11):3299–3307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li W, Liu H. Numerical simulation of the effect of relative thickness on aerodynamic performance improvement of asymmetrical blunt trailing-edge modification. Renew Energy. 2015;80:489–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soğukpinar H. Numerical simulation oF 4-digit inclined NACA 00XX airfoil to find optimum angle of attack for airplane wing. Uludağ Univ J Fac Eng. 2017;22(1):169.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen C-C, Le T-H-H, Tran P-T. A numerical study of thickness effect of the symmetric NACA 4-digit airfoils on self starting capability of a 1 kW H-type vertical axis wind turbine. Int J Mech Eng Appl. 2015;3:7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Danao LA, Qin N, Howell R. A numerical study of blade thickness and camber effects on vertical axis wind turbines. Proc Inst Mech Eng A: J Power Energy. 2012;226(7):867–881.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong H, Lee S, Kwon S-D. Blockage corrections for wind tunnel tests conducted on a Darrieus wind turbine. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2018;179:229–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W-C, Chong WT, Chao T-H. Performance analysis of a cross-axis wind turbine from wind tunnel experiments. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2018;174:312–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohman TC, Martinelli L, Smits AJ. The effects of inflow conditions on vertical axis wind turbine wake structure and performance. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2018;183:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Hao W, Li C, et al. Numerical study of effect of solidity on vertical axis wind turbine with Gurney flap. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2019;186:17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen J, Ahmed NA. Enhancing vertical axis wind turbine by dynamic stall control using synthetic jets. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2013;114:12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aramendia I, Fernandez-Gamiz U, Ramos-Hernanz JA, et al. Flow control devices for wind turbines Energy Harvesting and Energy Efficiency. 2017;37:629–655.
   Google Scholar
• Bouzaher MT, Hadid M. Active control of the vertical axis wind turbine by the association of flapping wings to their blades. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;52:714–722.
   Google Scholar
• Belamadi R, Djemili A, Ilinca A, et al. Aerodynamic performance analysis of slotted airfoils for application to wind turbine blades. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn. 2016;151:79–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salimipour E, Yazdani S. Improvement of aerodynamic performance of an offshore wind turbine blade by moving surface mechanism. Ocean Eng. 2020;195, 106710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshnevis A, Yazdani S, Salimipour E. Analysis of co-flow jet effects on airfoil at moderate Reynolds numbers. J Theor Appl Mech. 2020;58(3):685–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zha G, Paxton C. A novel airfoil circulation augment flow control method using co-flow jet. In: 2nd AIAA Flow Control Conference, Portland, OR, United States, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Zha G, Gao W, Paxton CD. Jet effects on coflow jet airfoil performance. AIAA J. 2007;45(6):1222–1231.
   Google Scholar
• Zha G, Paxton C, Conley CA, et al. Effect of injection slot size on the performance of coflow jet airfoil. J Aircr. 2006;43(4):987–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells A, Conely C, Carroll B, et al. Velocity field for an airfoil with co-flow jet flow control. In: 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Abinav R, Nair NR, Sravan P, et al. CFD analysis of co flow jet airfoil. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016;9(45): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Xu K, Yang Y, et al. Aircraft control surfaces using co-flow jet active flow control airfoil. In: 2018 Applied Aerodynamics Conference Atlanta, Georgia, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chng TL, Rachman A, Tsai HM, et al. Flow control of an airfoil via injection and suction. J Aircr. 2009;46(1):291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre A, Zha G-C. Co-flow jet airfoil trade study part I: energy consumption and aerodynamic efficiency. In: 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre A, Zha G-C. Co-flow jet airfoil trade study part II: moment and drag. In: 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference; 2014 Jun 16–20; Atlanta, GA; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dano B, Kirk D, Zha G. Experimental investigation of jet mixing mechanism of co-flow jet airfoil, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Xu H-Y, Xing S-L, Ye Z-Y. Numerical study of the S809 airfoil aerodynamic performance using a co-flow jet active control concept. J Renew Sustain Energy. 2015;7(2):023131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddanathi SL. Application of co-flow jet concept to aircraft lift increase. Int J Adv Mech Automob Eng. 2016;3(1): 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mirhosseini M, Khoshnevis AB. Effect of adverse pressure gradient on a fluctuating velocity over the co-flow jet airfoil. Int J Mech Mechatron Eng. 2016;10: 118–122.
   Google Scholar
• Amzad Hossain Md, Nizam Uddin Md, Rasedul Islam Md, et al. Enhancement of aerodynamic properties of an airfoil by co flow jet (CFJ) flow. Am J Eng Res. 2015;4(1): 103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre A, Dano B, Bartow WB, et al. Performance and energy expenditure of co-flow jet airfoil with variation of Mach number. J Aircr. Nov-Dec 2016;53(6):1757–1767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Zha G. Simulation of 3D co-flow jet airfoil with embedded micro-compressor actuator. In: 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Kissimmee, Florida, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zha G. Improved delayed detached eddy simulation of super-lift coefficient of subsonic co-flow jet flow control airfoil. In: 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Kissimmee, Florida, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zha G. Numerical simulation of super-lift coefficient of co-flow jet flow control wing. In: 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Kissimmee, Florida, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Xu K, Yang Y, et al. Aircraft control surfaces using co-flow jet active flow control airfoil. In: Applied Aerodynamics Conference; 2018 Jun 25–29; Atlanta, Georgia; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ethiraj S. Aerodynamic performance analysis of a co-flow jet aerfoil using CFD. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2017;4(7): 987–993.
   Google Scholar
• Satyajit D, Rathakrishnan E. Experimental study of supersonic co-flowing jet. Proc Inst Mech. Eng. G: J Aerosp Eng. 2018: DOI:10.1177/0954410017749866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salimipour E, Salimipour A. Power minimization and vortex shedding elimination of a circular cylinder by moving surface mechanism. Ocean Eng. 2019;189, 106408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan RG, Lestari AD. RK-SIMPLER: explicit time-accurate algorithm for incompressible flows. AIAA J. 2016;54(2):616–624.
   Google Scholar
• Salimipour E. A modification of the k-kL-ω turbulence model for simulation of short and long separation bubbles. Comput Fluids. 2019;181:67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziadé P, Feero MA, Lavoie P, et al. Shear layer development, separation, and stability over a Low-Reynolds number airfoil. J Fluids Eng. 2018;140(7):071201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinoie K, Okuno M, Sunada Y. Airfoil stall suppression by use of a bubble burst control plate. AIAA J. 2009;47(2):322–330.
   Google Scholar