Assessment of turbulence models for single phase CFD computations of a liquid-liquid hydrocyclone using OpenFOAM

References

• Scwerzler GI. Recycling of glaze waste through hydrocyclone separation. Powder Technol. 2005 Oct;160:135–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga ER, Huziwara WK, Martignoni WP, et al. Improving hydrocyclone geometry for oil/water separation. Braz J Pet Gas. 2015;9:115–123.
   Google Scholar
• Saidi M, Maddahian R, Farhahie B, et al. Modeling of flow field and separation efficiency of a deoiling hydrocyclone using large eddy simulation. Int J Mineral Process. 2012;112-113:84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto RCV, Medronho RA, Castilho LR. Separation of CHO cells using hydrocyclones. Cytotechnology. 2008;56:57–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsayed A, Medronho RA, Wagner R, et al. Use of hydrocyclones for mammalian cell retention – i. Separation efficiency and cell viability. Eng Life Sci (Print). 2006;6:347–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castilho LR, Medronho RA. A simple procedure for design and performance prediction of Bradley and Rietema hydrocyclones. Miner Eng. 2000;13:183–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho MAZ, Medronho RA. A model for performance prediction of hydrocyclones. Chem Eng J. 2001;84:7–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack MD, Prasad RO, Bakker A, et al. Advances in cyclones modelling using unstructured grids. Chem Eng Res Des. 2000;78(8):1098–1104.
   Google Scholar
• Delgadillo JA, Rajamani RK. A comparative study of three turbulence-closure models for the hydrocyclone problem. Int J Mineral Process. 2005;77:217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsayed K. Design of a novel gas cyclone vortex finder using adjoint method. Sep Purif Technol. 2015;142:274–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang K, Lee GG, Huh KY. Evaluation of the turbulence models for gas flow and particle transport in urans and les of a cyclone separator. Comput Fluids. 2018;172:274–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui B, Wei D, Gao S, et al. Numerical and experimental studies of flow field in hydrocyclone with air core. Trans Nonferrous Met Sec China. 2014;24:2642–2649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davailles A, Climent E, Bourgeouis F. Fundamental understanding of swirling flow pattern in hydrocyclones. Sep Purif Technol. 2012;92:152–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakamalla TR, Kumbhar KS, Gujjula R, et al. Computational and experimental study of the effect of inclination on hydrocyclone perfomance. Sep Purif Technol. 2014;138:104–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokni I, Dhaouadi H, Bournot P, et al. Numerical investigation of the effect of the cylindrical height on separation perfomances of uniflow hydrocyclone. Chem Eng Sci. 2015;122:500–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu-ling G, De-zhou W, Weng-gang L, et al. CFD numerical simulation of flow velocity characteristics of hydrocyclone. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China. 2011;21(12):2783–2799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raziyeh S, Ataalah SG. CFD simulation of an industrial hydrocyclone with eulerian-eulerian approach: a case study. Int J Mining Sci Technol. 2014;24:643–648.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens DW, Mohanarangan K. Turbulence model analysis of flow inside a hydrocyclone. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries; Melbourne, Australia. Elsevier; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens DW, Sideroff C, Jemcov A. Simulation and validation of turbulent gas flow in a cyclone using caelus. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries; Melbourne, Australia. CSIRO; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Alahmadi YH, Nowakowski AF. Modified shear stress transport model with curvature correction for the prediction of swirling flow in a cyclone separator. Chem Eng Sci. 2016;147:150–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnov PE, Menter FR. Sensization of the SST turbulence model to rotation and curvature by applying the spalart-shur correct term. ASME J Turbomach. 2009;131:041010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga EB. Desenvolvimenro de Um Hidrociclone para a Separação de Óleo Presente em Águas Oleosas. D.Sc. thesis, Tecnologia de Processos Químicos e Bioquímicos/School of Chemistry/Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Menter FR, Kuntz M, Langtry R. Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. In Tummers M, Hanjalic K, Nagano Y, editors. Turbulent, heat and mass tranfer 4. Antalya (Turkey): Begell House, Inc.; 2003. p. 625–632.
   Google Scholar
• Launder BE, Spalding DB. The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 1974;3:269–289.
   Google Scholar
• Spalart PR, Shur M. On the sensization of turbulence models to rotation and curvature. Aerospace Sci Technol. 1997;5:297–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakhot V, Thangam S, Gatski TB, et al. Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique. ICASE; 1991 Jul.
   Google Scholar
• Shih T, Liou WW, Shabbir A, et al. A new k-ε eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows. Comput Fluids. 1995a;24:227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox DC. Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models. AIAA J. 1988;26.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Shih TH. Computation of confined coflow jets with three turbulence models. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 1994;19:939–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien FS, Chen WL, Leschziner MA. Low-Reynolds-number eddy-viscosity modelling based on non-linear stress-strain/vorticity relations. In Rodi B, editor. Engineering turbulence modelling and measurements 3. Heraklion-Crete (Greece): Elsevier; 1996. p. 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Klein TS, Craft TJ, Iacovides H. The development and application of two-time-scale turbulence models for non-equilibrium flows. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2018;71:334–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson MM, Launder BE. Ground effects on pressure fluctuation in the atmospheric boundary layer. J Fluid Mech. 1978;86:491–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launder BE, Reece GJ, Rodi W. Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. J Fluid Mech. 1975;68:537–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirker S, Goniva C, Kloss C, et al. Application of a hybrid lattice Boltzmann-finite volume turbulence model to cyclone short-cut flow. Powder Technol. 2013;235:572–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope SB. Turbulent-viscosity models. Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 358–386.
   Google Scholar
• Shih T, Zhu J, Lumley JL. A new Reynolds stress algebraic equation model. Comp Methods Appl Mech Engrg. 1995b;125:287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter FR. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 1994;32.
   Google Scholar
• Hanjalic K, Launder BE, Schiestel R. Multiple-time scale concept in turbulent transport modelling. 1980. p. 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Craft TJ, Launder BE, Suga K. Development and application of a cubic eddy-viscosity model of turbulence. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 1996;17:108–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradnia P. CFD of air flow in hydro power generators. Licenciate of engineering thesis, Thesis for the Degree of Licentiate of Engineering/Department of Applied Mechanics/Chalmers University of Technology, Gteborg; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Liu F. A thorough description of how wall functions are implemented in OpenFOAM. In: Nilsson H, editor. Proceedings of CFD with OpenSource Software; 2016. Available from: http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/∼hani/kurser/OS_CFD/#YEAR_2016
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox DC. Turbulence modeling for CFD. La Cañada: DCW Industries, Inc.; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, et al. Procedure of estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng. 2008;130:4. doi:10.1115/1.2960953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe H, Kawamura H, Matsuo Y. Surface heat-flux fluctuation in a turbulent channel flow up to Reτ=1020 with Pr=0.025 and 0.71. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2004;25:404–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida YP. Simulação fluidodinâmica de uma válvula ciclônica [dissertation]. Programa de Engenharia Mecânica, COPPE, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Monson DJ, Seegmiller HL, Mcconnaughey PK. Comparison of experiment with calculations using curvature-corrected zero and two equation turbulence models for a two-dimensional U-duct. Proceedings of the AIAA 21st Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference, Seattle, WA; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Passalacqua A, Fox RO. Implementation of an iterative solution procedure for multi-fluid gas–particle flow models on unstructured grids. Powder Technol. 2011;213:174–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svarovsky L. Solid-Liquid separation. 4th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Marins LPM, Duarte DG, Loureiro JBR, et al. LDV and PIV characterization of the flow in a hydrocyclone without an air-core. J Pet Sci Eng. 2010;70:168–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saqr KM, Kassem HI, Aly HS, et al. Computational study of decaying annular vortex flow using the Rϵ/k−ϵ turbulence model. Appl Math Model. 2012;36:4652–4664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brar LS, Sharma RP, Elsayed K. The effect of the cyclone length on the performance of Stairmand high-efficiency cyclone. Powder Technol. 2015;286:668–677. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2015.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko J, Zahrai S, Macchion O, et al. Numerical modeling of highly swirling flows in a through-flow cylindrical hydrocyclone. AIChE J. 2006;52(10):3334–3344. doi:10.1002/aic.10955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong S, Jiang Y, Jin R, et al. Numerical study of vortex eccentricity in a gas cyclone. Appl Math Model. 2020;80:683–701. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2019.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildeh HK, Mohammadian A, Nistor I, et al. Numerical modeling of turbulent buoyant wall jets in stationary ambient water. J Hydraul Eng. 2014a;140(6).
   Google Scholar
• Gildeh HK, Mohammadian A, Nistor I, et al. Numerical modeling of 30∘ and 45∘ inclined dense turbulent jets in stationary ambient. J Environ Fluid Mech. 2014b;15(3):537–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildeh HK, Mohammadian A, Nistor I, et al. CFD modelling and analysis of the behavior of 30∘ and 45∘ inclined dense jets – new numerical insights. J Appl Water Eng Res. 2015;4(2):112–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter F, Esch T. Elements of industrial heat transfer predictions. Proceedings of COBEM 2001, Invited Lectures; Uberlândia, MG, Brazil. ABCM; 2001. p. 117–127.
   Google Scholar
• Daly BJ, Harlow FH. Transport equations in turbulence. Phys Fluids. 1970;13:2634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar