On turbulent flow and aerodynamic noise of generic side-view mirror with cell-centred finite difference method

References

• Ask J, Davidson L. 2005. The near field acoustics of a generic side mirror based on an incompressible approach. Chalmers Univ. Research Report 2005:5.
   Google Scholar
• Höld R, Brenneis A, Eberle A, et al. Numerical simulation of aeroacoustic sound generated by generic bodies placed on a plate. I – prediction of aeroacoustic sources. In: 5th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit. 1999. p. 1896.
   Google Scholar
• Siegert R, Schwarz V, Reichenberger J. Numerical simulation of aeroacoustic sound generated by generic bodies placed on a plate. II – prediction of radiated sound pressure. In: 5th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit. 1999. p. 1895.
   Google Scholar
• Ask J, Davidson L. The sub-critical flow past a generic side mirror and its impact on sound generation and propagation. In: 12th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (27th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). 2006. p. 2558.
   Google Scholar
• Ask J, Davidson L. A numerical investigation of the flow past a generic side mirror and its impact on sound generation. J Fluids Eng. 2009;131(6):061102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okutsu Y, Hamamoto N, Yanagimoto K, et al. Verification of automobile aerodynamic noise transmitted through side window glass. J Environ Engin. 2013;8(1):41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Caro S, Cotoni V, Shorter P, et al. Turbulent surface pressure field in low speed flow. In: Flinovia-flow induced noise and vibration issues and aspects. Springer; 2015. p. 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Yao H-D, Davidson L. Generation of interior cavity noise due to window vibration excited by turbulent flows past a generic side-view mirror. Phys Fluids. 2018 Mar;30(3):036104.
   Google Scholar
• Yao H-D, Davidson L. Vibro-acoustics response of a simplified glass window excited by the turbulent wake of a quarter-spherocylinder body. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 May;145(5):3163–3176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capizzano F, Alterio L, Russo S, et al. A hybrid rans-les cartesian method based on a skew-symmetric convective operator. J Comput Phys. 2019;390:359–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Diasinos S, Thornber B. A fast transient solver for low-mach number aerodynamics and aeroacoustics. Comput Fluids. 2021;214:104748.
   Google Scholar
• Chode K, Viswanathan H, Chow K. Noise emitted from a generic side-view mirror with different aspect ratios and inclinations. Physics of Fluids. 2021;33(8):084105.
   Google Scholar
• Nagata T, Nonomura T, Takahashi S, et al. Direct numerical simulation of subsonic, transonic and supersonic flow over an isolated sphere up to a reynolds number of 1000. J Fluid Mech. 2020;904:A36..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Li X, Lin D. Numerical simulation of the 30p30n high-lift aerofoil noise with spectral difference method. AIAA J. 2020;58(6):2517–2532.
   Google Scholar
• Hoarau J-C, Cinnella P, Gloerfelt X. Large eddy simulation of turbomachinery flows using a high-order implicit residual smoothing scheme. Comput Fluids. 2020;198:104395.
   Google Scholar
• Li W, Guo Y, Liu W. On the mechanism of acoustic resonances from a leading-edge slat. Aero Sci Technol. 2021;113:106711.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Ding C, Liang C. High-order implicit large-eddy simulation of flow over a marine propeller. Comput Fluids. 2021;224:104967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer A, Abe Y, Vermeire B, et al. High-order accurate direct numerical simulation of flow over a mtu-t161 low pressure turbine blade. Comput Fluids. 2021;226:104989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Liao F, Cai J, et al. Investigation on rod-airfoil noise with high-order cell-centered finite difference method and acoustic analogy. Aeros Sci Technol. 2020;102:105851.
   Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Liao F, Cai J. Compact schemes for multiscale flows with cell-centered finite difference method. J Sci Comput. 2020;85(1):1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Liao F, Cai J. Numerical simulation of 30p30n multi-element airfoil using delayed detached-eddy simulation. In: AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum. 2020. p. 2556.
   Google Scholar
• Deck S, Renard N. Towards an enhanced protection of attached boundary layers in hybrid RANS/LES methods. J Comput Phys. 2020;400:108970.
   Google Scholar
• Deck S. Recent improvements in the zonal detached eddy simulation (zdes) formulation. Theor Comput Fluid Dyn. 2012;26(6):523–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shima E, Kitamura K. Parameter-free simple low-dissipation AUSM-family scheme for all speeds. AIAA J. 2011;49(8):1693–1709.
   Google Scholar
• Liao F, Ye Z, Zhang L. Extending geometric conservation law to cell-centered finite difference methods on stationary grids. J Comput Phys. 2015;284:419–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao F, He G. High-order adapter schemes for cell-centered finite difference method. J Comput Phys. 2020;403:109090.
   Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Liao F, Cai J. Convergence acceleration for subiterative DDADI/D3ADI using multiblock implicit boundary condition. J Comput Phys. 2021;429:110009.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Moin P, Moser R. Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech. 1987 Apr;177:133–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Hussain F. Propagation velocity of perturbations in turbulent channel flow. Phys Fluids A Fluid Dyn. 1993;5(3):695–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rung T, Eschricht D, Yan J, et al. Sound radiation of the vortex flow past a generic side mirror. In: 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference & Exhibit. 2002. p. 2549.
   Google Scholar