High-enthalpy effects on turbulent coherent structures over a curved compression corner

References

• Candler GV. Rate effects in hypersonic flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2019;51:379–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright R, Zoby E. Flight boundary layer transition measurement on a slender cone at Mach 20. AIAA 1977-719, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Martin MP, Candler GV. DNS of a Mach 4 Boundary Layer with Chemical Reactions. AIAA 2000-0399.
   Google Scholar
• Duan L, Martin MP. Assessment of turbulence–chemistry interaction in hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. AIAA J. 2011;49(1):172–184.
   Google Scholar
• Duan L, Martin MP. An effective procedure for testing the validity of DNS of wall-bounded turbulence including finite-rate reactions. AIAA J. 2009;47(1):244–251.
   Google Scholar
• Sciacovelli L, Passiatore D, Cinnella P, et al. Assessment of a high-order shock-capturing central-difference scheme for hypersonic turbulent flow simulations. Comput Fluids. 2021;230(11):105134.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Liu J, Luo S, et al. Thermochemical non-equilibrium effects on hypersonic shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction. Acta Astronaut. 2022;192:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Yuan X, Sun D, et al. DNS of high-temperature turbulent boundary layer with chemical nonequilibrium (in Chinese). Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin. 2021;43(1):124877.
   Google Scholar
• Liu P, Sun D, Li C, et al. Statistical properties of high-temperature turbulent boundary layer including chemical nonequilibrium (in Chinese). Acta Aerodyn Sin. 2022;40(4):124–131.
   Google Scholar
• She ZS, Leveque E. Universal scaling laws in fully developed turbulence. Phys Rev Lett. 1994;72(3):336–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Mo F, Gao Z, et al. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent and high-temperature gas effect coupled flow (in Chinese). Acta Aerodyn Sin. 2020;38(6):1111–1119.
   Google Scholar
• Kim P. Non-equilibrium effects on hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. PhD. Thesis, Los Angeles: University of California, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Urzay J, Renzo MD. Engineering aspects of hypersoinic turbulent flows at suborbital enthalpies. Annual Research Briefs, Center of turbulence Research, Stanford University. 2021: 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Di Renzo M, Urzay J. Direct numerical simulation of a hypersonic transitional boundary layer at suborbital enthalpies. J Fluid Mech. 2021;912:A29. DOI:10.1017/jfm.2020.1144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpiani PS. Numerical strategy to perform direct numerical simulations of hypersonic shock/boundary-layer interaction in chemical nonequilibrium. Shock Waves. 2021;31:361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Yuan X, Liang F, et al. Quadrant decomposition analysis of fluctuations in high-temperature turbulent boundary layer with chemical non-equilibrium (in Chinese). Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin. 2021;42(S1):726338.
   Google Scholar
• Renard N, Deck S. A theoretical decomposition of mean skin friction generation into physical phenomena across the boundary layer. J Fluid Mech. 2016;790:339–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw P. The effect of mean compression or dilatation on the turbulence structure of supersonic boundary layer. J Fluid Mech. 1974;63:449–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spina EF, Smits AJ. The physics of supersonic turbulent boundary layers. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 1994;26:287–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong FL, Li X, Duan Y, et al. Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent boundary layer subjected to a curved compression ramp. Phys Fluids. 2017;29:125101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M, Sandham ND, Hu Z. Turbulence structures and statistics of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer subjected to concave surface curvature. J Fluid Mech. 2019;865:60–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon S, McBride BJ. Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications. NASA RP, 1994: p. 1311.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta RN, Yos JM, Thompson RA, et al. A review of reaction rates and thermodynamic and transport properties for 11-species air model for chemical and thermal non-equilibrium calculations to 30000 K. NASA RP, 1990: p. 1232.
   Google Scholar
• Sun D, Guo Q, Li C, et al. Assessment of optimized symmetric fourth-order weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme in direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulence. Comput Fluids. 2020;197:104383-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Guo Q, Li C, et al. Direct numerical simulation of effects of a micro-ramp on a hypersonic shock wave/boundary layer interaction. Phys Fluids. 2019;31(12):12601-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu PX, Guo QL, Sun D, et al. Wall effect on the flow structure of three-dimensional rotating detonation wave. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2020;45:29546–29559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H X, Zhang L P, Zhang S H, et al. Some recent progress of high-order methods on structured and unstructured grids in CARDC. Comput Fluids. 2017;154:371–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Chen J, Yuan X, et al. Improved weighted NND scheme for shock-capturing. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1786:012043.
   Google Scholar
• Guo Q, Sun D, Li C, et al. A New discontinuity indicator for hybrid WENO schemes. J Sci Comput. 2020;83(28). DOI:10.1007/s10915-020-01217-w
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gottlieb S, Shu C-W. Total variation diminishing runge-Kutta schemes. Math Comput. 1998;67(221):73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler MC, Gonzalez DR, Stack CM, et al. Synthetic generation of equilibrium boundary layer turbulence from modeled statistics. Comput Fluids. 2018;165:127–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan L, Beekman I, Martin MP. Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Part 3. Effect of mach number. J Fluid Mech. 2011;672:245–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan L, Martin MP. Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. Part 4. Effect of high enthalpy. J Fluid Mech. 2011;684:25–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirozzoli S, Grasso F, Gatski TB. Direct numerical simulation and analysis of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer at M = 2.25. Phys Fluids. 2004;16(3):530–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer J. Some statistical properties of the pressure field radiated by a turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids. 1964;7(8):1191–1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar